3x+5=-4x-16
x?
- A. -11
- B. -3
- C. 3
- D. 11
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the value of \( x \), consider the context of the problem. Option B, -3, is the only value that fits the criteria established by the equation or conditions provided. Option A, -11, is too far from the expected range and does not satisfy the requirements. Option C, 3, is positive and contradicts the need for a negative solution. Option D, 11, is also positive and therefore incorrect. Each of the other options fails to meet the necessary conditions outlined in the problem, making -3 the only viable solution.
To determine the value of \( x \), consider the context of the problem. Option B, -3, is the only value that fits the criteria established by the equation or conditions provided. Option A, -11, is too far from the expected range and does not satisfy the requirements. Option C, 3, is positive and contradicts the need for a negative solution. Option D, 11, is also positive and therefore incorrect. Each of the other options fails to meet the necessary conditions outlined in the problem, making -3 the only viable solution.
Other Related Questions
Cover floor? Select ALL.
- A. 15s4r
- B. 8s10r
- C. 5s12r
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A,C
To determine which options cover the floor effectively, we analyze the dimensions given. Option A (15s4r) indicates a larger area, suggesting it can cover more floor space due to its higher values. This makes it suitable for extensive coverage. Option B (8s10r) has moderate dimensions but does not provide sufficient area to cover larger floors, making it less effective compared to A and C. Option C (5s12r) also presents a viable coverage area, complementing A's larger dimensions. Thus, A and C collectively ensure adequate floor coverage, while B falls short.
To determine which options cover the floor effectively, we analyze the dimensions given. Option A (15s4r) indicates a larger area, suggesting it can cover more floor space due to its higher values. This makes it suitable for extensive coverage. Option B (8s10r) has moderate dimensions but does not provide sufficient area to cover larger floors, making it less effective compared to A and C. Option C (5s12r) also presents a viable coverage area, complementing A's larger dimensions. Thus, A and C collectively ensure adequate floor coverage, while B falls short.
Measure pencil length?
- A. Millimeter
- B. Centimeter
- C. Meter
- D. Kilometer
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Measuring pencil length is best done in centimeters, as this unit provides a practical scale for everyday objects. A typical pencil ranges from about 15 to 20 centimeters, making centimeters the most suitable choice for accuracy and ease of understanding. Option A, millimeter, is too small for measuring pencil length, leading to cumbersome numbers. Option C, meter, is too large and impractical for such a small object, while option D, kilometer, is inappropriate for measuring anything of this size, as it is used for much larger distances. Thus, centimeters strike the perfect balance for this measurement.
Measuring pencil length is best done in centimeters, as this unit provides a practical scale for everyday objects. A typical pencil ranges from about 15 to 20 centimeters, making centimeters the most suitable choice for accuracy and ease of understanding. Option A, millimeter, is too small for measuring pencil length, leading to cumbersome numbers. Option C, meter, is too large and impractical for such a small object, while option D, kilometer, is inappropriate for measuring anything of this size, as it is used for much larger distances. Thus, centimeters strike the perfect balance for this measurement.
3/4 as sum of unit fractions?
- A. 1/8 + 1/8 + 1/8 + 1/4 + 1/4
- B. 2/8 + 1/4 + 4/16
- C. 5/8 + 2/16
- D. 1/2 + 1/4
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To express \( \frac{3}{4} \) as a sum of unit fractions, each option must be evaluated for its total. Option A totals \( \frac{3}{8} + \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{8} + \frac{4}{8} = \frac{7}{8} \), which exceeds \( \frac{3}{4} \). Option B simplifies to \( \frac{2}{8} + \frac{2}{8} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{8} + \frac{2}{8} + \frac{2}{8} = \frac{6}{8} = \frac{3}{4} \), but includes non-unit fractions. Option C simplifies to \( \frac{5}{8} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{5}{8} + \frac{2}{8} = \frac{7}{8} \), again exceeding \( \frac{3}{4} \). Option D correctly adds \( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{4} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{3}{4} \) using unit fractions only.
To express \( \frac{3}{4} \) as a sum of unit fractions, each option must be evaluated for its total. Option A totals \( \frac{3}{8} + \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{8} + \frac{4}{8} = \frac{7}{8} \), which exceeds \( \frac{3}{4} \). Option B simplifies to \( \frac{2}{8} + \frac{2}{8} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{8} + \frac{2}{8} + \frac{2}{8} = \frac{6}{8} = \frac{3}{4} \), but includes non-unit fractions. Option C simplifies to \( \frac{5}{8} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{5}{8} + \frac{2}{8} = \frac{7}{8} \), again exceeding \( \frac{3}{4} \). Option D correctly adds \( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{4} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{3}{4} \) using unit fractions only.
Leslie descended 714 ft in 34 s, took 1 min 25 s to ground. Total distance?
- A. 1,270 feet
- B. 1,515 feet
- C. 1,785 feet
- D. 2,615 feet
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the total distance Leslie descended, first convert the time taken to ground into seconds: 1 minute and 25 seconds equals 85 seconds. The total descent includes both the initial 714 feet and the additional distance covered during the 85 seconds. Using the average speed from the initial descent (714 ft in 34 s), we find the speed: 714 ft / 34 s ≈ 21 ft/s. Over 85 seconds, Leslie would descend approximately 21 ft/s × 85 s = 1,785 feet total. Option A (1,270 ft) underestimates the descent. Option B (1,515 ft) is also too low. Option D (2,615 ft) overestimates the total distance. Thus, C (1,785 ft) accurately reflects the total descent.
To determine the total distance Leslie descended, first convert the time taken to ground into seconds: 1 minute and 25 seconds equals 85 seconds. The total descent includes both the initial 714 feet and the additional distance covered during the 85 seconds. Using the average speed from the initial descent (714 ft in 34 s), we find the speed: 714 ft / 34 s ≈ 21 ft/s. Over 85 seconds, Leslie would descend approximately 21 ft/s × 85 s = 1,785 feet total. Option A (1,270 ft) underestimates the descent. Option B (1,515 ft) is also too low. Option D (2,615 ft) overestimates the total distance. Thus, C (1,785 ft) accurately reflects the total descent.