Driveway for two cars, width?
- A. 0.7
- B. 7
- C. 70
- D. 700
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
A driveway for two cars typically requires a width of about 7 feet to accommodate standard vehicle sizes comfortably. Option A (0.7) is too narrow, as it would not allow even one car to fit. Option C (70) and Option D (700) are excessively wide for a residential driveway, making them impractical and unnecessary. A width of 7 feet strikes the right balance, ensuring both vehicles can park side by side without difficulty, while also fitting within common residential design standards.
A driveway for two cars typically requires a width of about 7 feet to accommodate standard vehicle sizes comfortably. Option A (0.7) is too narrow, as it would not allow even one car to fit. Option C (70) and Option D (700) are excessively wide for a residential driveway, making them impractical and unnecessary. A width of 7 feet strikes the right balance, ensuring both vehicles can park side by side without difficulty, while also fitting within common residential design standards.
Other Related Questions
Yellow binders?
- A. 20
- B. 40
- C. 200
- D. 400
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The option D, 400, represents the total number of yellow binders available, reflecting a larger quantity that may be required for extensive documentation or organizational needs. Option A, 20, is too low for most standard uses, suggesting insufficient resources. Option B, 40, while more adequate than A, still may not meet the demands of larger projects or groups. Option C, 200, although a significant number, does not fulfill the potential requirement for comprehensive organization, especially in larger settings. Thus, option D ensures ample supply for diverse needs.
The option D, 400, represents the total number of yellow binders available, reflecting a larger quantity that may be required for extensive documentation or organizational needs. Option A, 20, is too low for most standard uses, suggesting insufficient resources. Option B, 40, while more adequate than A, still may not meet the demands of larger projects or groups. Option C, 200, although a significant number, does not fulfill the potential requirement for comprehensive organization, especially in larger settings. Thus, option D ensures ample supply for diverse needs.
Order 0.68, 1/12, 1(1/5), 3/5 least to greatest?
- A. 1(1/5), 0.68, 3/5, 1/12
- B. 1/12, 3/5, 0.68, 1(1/5)
- C. 1/12, 0.68, 3/5, 1(1/5)
- D. 0.68, 1/12, 3/5, 1(1/5)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To compare the values, first convert them to a common format. - 1(1/5) equals 1.2. - 0.68 remains as is. - 3/5 converts to 0.6. - 1/12 is approximately 0.0833. Ordering these from least to greatest gives: 1/12 (0.0833), 3/5 (0.6), 0.68, and 1(1/5) (1.2). Option A incorrectly places 1(1/5) first, while C misplaces 3/5 and 0.68. Option D also misorders the values by placing 0.68 before 1/12. Thus, B accurately reflects the correct sequence of values.
To compare the values, first convert them to a common format. - 1(1/5) equals 1.2. - 0.68 remains as is. - 3/5 converts to 0.6. - 1/12 is approximately 0.0833. Ordering these from least to greatest gives: 1/12 (0.0833), 3/5 (0.6), 0.68, and 1(1/5) (1.2). Option A incorrectly places 1(1/5) first, while C misplaces 3/5 and 0.68. Option D also misorders the values by placing 0.68 before 1/12. Thus, B accurately reflects the correct sequence of values.
Caterpillar 1 ft in 7.5 min. 18 min?
- A. 2.4
- B. 8
- C. 11.5
- D. 25.5
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine how far the caterpillar travels in 18 minutes, first calculate its speed. It moves 1 foot in 7.5 minutes, which equates to \( \frac{1 \text{ ft}}{7.5 \text{ min}} \). In 18 minutes, the distance covered can be calculated using the formula: \[ \text{Distance} = \text{Speed} \times \text{Time} \] Converting 18 minutes into feet: \[ \text{Distance} = \left(\frac{1 \text{ ft}}{7.5 \text{ min}}\right) \times 18 \text{ min} = 2.4 \text{ ft} \] Option B (8) overestimates the distance, while C (11.5) and D (25.5) significantly exceed the calculated distance, demonstrating a misunderstanding of the speed-time relationship.
To determine how far the caterpillar travels in 18 minutes, first calculate its speed. It moves 1 foot in 7.5 minutes, which equates to \( \frac{1 \text{ ft}}{7.5 \text{ min}} \). In 18 minutes, the distance covered can be calculated using the formula: \[ \text{Distance} = \text{Speed} \times \text{Time} \] Converting 18 minutes into feet: \[ \text{Distance} = \left(\frac{1 \text{ ft}}{7.5 \text{ min}}\right) \times 18 \text{ min} = 2.4 \text{ ft} \] Option B (8) overestimates the distance, while C (11.5) and D (25.5) significantly exceed the calculated distance, demonstrating a misunderstanding of the speed-time relationship.
436,521 315,624 126,354 642,135
- A. 100x_____
- B. 10x_____
- C. 0.1x_____
- D. 0.01x_____
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B,A,C,D
To determine the appropriate multiplier for each number, we analyze their values: - **B: 10x_____** is valid as multiplying by 10 shifts the decimal point one place to the right, increasing the value significantly, making it suitable for larger numbers like 436,521 and 315,624. - **A: 100x_____** is also applicable, as multiplying by 100 shifts the decimal two places, further increasing the value. However, it is not the most fitting choice for the context of smaller increments. - **C: 0.1x_____** indicates a decrease in value, which applies to smaller numbers but is less relevant for the context of significant values like 126,354. - **D: 0.01x_____** further diminishes the number, making it the least appropriate option for the given values, as it reduces the numbers excessively. In conclusion, B is the best fit for maintaining relevance to the larger values, while A, C, and D serve progressively less appropriate roles.
To determine the appropriate multiplier for each number, we analyze their values: - **B: 10x_____** is valid as multiplying by 10 shifts the decimal point one place to the right, increasing the value significantly, making it suitable for larger numbers like 436,521 and 315,624. - **A: 100x_____** is also applicable, as multiplying by 100 shifts the decimal two places, further increasing the value. However, it is not the most fitting choice for the context of smaller increments. - **C: 0.1x_____** indicates a decrease in value, which applies to smaller numbers but is less relevant for the context of significant values like 126,354. - **D: 0.01x_____** further diminishes the number, making it the least appropriate option for the given values, as it reduces the numbers excessively. In conclusion, B is the best fit for maintaining relevance to the larger values, while A, C, and D serve progressively less appropriate roles.