Order 0.68, 1/12, 1(1/5), 3/5 least to greatest?
- A. 1(1/5), 0.68, 3/5, 1/12
- B. 1/12, 3/5, 0.68, 1(1/5)
- C. 1/12, 0.68, 3/5, 1(1/5)
- D. 0.68, 1/12, 3/5, 1(1/5)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To compare the values, first convert them to a common format. - 1(1/5) equals 1.2. - 0.68 remains as is. - 3/5 converts to 0.6. - 1/12 is approximately 0.0833. Ordering these from least to greatest gives: 1/12 (0.0833), 3/5 (0.6), 0.68, and 1(1/5) (1.2). Option A incorrectly places 1(1/5) first, while C misplaces 3/5 and 0.68. Option D also misorders the values by placing 0.68 before 1/12. Thus, B accurately reflects the correct sequence of values.
To compare the values, first convert them to a common format. - 1(1/5) equals 1.2. - 0.68 remains as is. - 3/5 converts to 0.6. - 1/12 is approximately 0.0833. Ordering these from least to greatest gives: 1/12 (0.0833), 3/5 (0.6), 0.68, and 1(1/5) (1.2). Option A incorrectly places 1(1/5) first, while C misplaces 3/5 and 0.68. Option D also misorders the values by placing 0.68 before 1/12. Thus, B accurately reflects the correct sequence of values.
Other Related Questions
178-degree angle?
- A. Acute
- B. Obtuse
- C. Right
- D. Straight
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
An angle measuring 178 degrees is classified as obtuse, as it is greater than 90 degrees but less than 180 degrees. Option A, acute, refers to angles less than 90 degrees, which does not apply here. Option C, right, denotes a 90-degree angle, clearly not fitting for 178 degrees. Option D, straight, describes a 180-degree angle, which is also not applicable since 178 degrees is slightly less than that. Thus, the only suitable classification for a 178-degree angle is obtuse.
An angle measuring 178 degrees is classified as obtuse, as it is greater than 90 degrees but less than 180 degrees. Option A, acute, refers to angles less than 90 degrees, which does not apply here. Option C, right, denotes a 90-degree angle, clearly not fitting for 178 degrees. Option D, straight, describes a 180-degree angle, which is also not applicable since 178 degrees is slightly less than that. Thus, the only suitable classification for a 178-degree angle is obtuse.
Answerable?
- A. 4.5 pounds?
- B. At least 15?
- C. Less than 8?
- D. 6-12 pounds?
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Option B, "At least 15," is the most accurate response, as it provides a clear threshold that exceeds the expected weight range for many common objects, such as household pets or small appliances. Option A, "4.5 pounds," is too low for many items, making it an unreliable estimate. Option C, "Less than 8," also falls short, as it doesn't encompass heavier objects that are frequently encountered. Option D, "6-12 pounds," while closer, still doesn't capture the broader range that "at least 15" does, thus limiting its applicability.
Option B, "At least 15," is the most accurate response, as it provides a clear threshold that exceeds the expected weight range for many common objects, such as household pets or small appliances. Option A, "4.5 pounds," is too low for many items, making it an unreliable estimate. Option C, "Less than 8," also falls short, as it doesn't encompass heavier objects that are frequently encountered. Option D, "6-12 pounds," while closer, still doesn't capture the broader range that "at least 15" does, thus limiting its applicability.
Which inequality?
- A. 2(x+1)<x
- B. x+2(x+1)>-1
- C. x<2x-1
- D. 2(x/2+1)<1
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Option C, \( x < 2x - 1 \), simplifies to \( x - 2x < -1 \), leading to \( -x < -1 \) or \( x > 1 \). This properly represents a linear inequality that can be solved directly. Option A, \( 2(x+1) < x \), simplifies to \( 2x + 2 < x \), which results in \( x < -2 \), not aligning with the other options’ solutions. Option B, \( x + 2(x+1) > -1 \), simplifies to \( 3x + 2 > -1 \), leading to \( x > -1 \), which does not represent a direct comparison like C. Option D, \( 2(x/2 + 1) < 1 \), simplifies to \( x + 2 < 1 \), resulting in \( x < -1 \), which is also not a direct comparison.
Option C, \( x < 2x - 1 \), simplifies to \( x - 2x < -1 \), leading to \( -x < -1 \) or \( x > 1 \). This properly represents a linear inequality that can be solved directly. Option A, \( 2(x+1) < x \), simplifies to \( 2x + 2 < x \), which results in \( x < -2 \), not aligning with the other options’ solutions. Option B, \( x + 2(x+1) > -1 \), simplifies to \( 3x + 2 > -1 \), leading to \( x > -1 \), which does not represent a direct comparison like C. Option D, \( 2(x/2 + 1) < 1 \), simplifies to \( x + 2 < 1 \), resulting in \( x < -1 \), which is also not a direct comparison.
Driveway for two cars, width?
- A. 0.7
- B. 7
- C. 70
- D. 700
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
A driveway for two cars typically requires a width of about 7 feet to accommodate standard vehicle sizes comfortably. Option A (0.7) is too narrow, as it would not allow even one car to fit. Option C (70) and Option D (700) are excessively wide for a residential driveway, making them impractical and unnecessary. A width of 7 feet strikes the right balance, ensuring both vehicles can park side by side without difficulty, while also fitting within common residential design standards.
A driveway for two cars typically requires a width of about 7 feet to accommodate standard vehicle sizes comfortably. Option A (0.7) is too narrow, as it would not allow even one car to fit. Option C (70) and Option D (700) are excessively wide for a residential driveway, making them impractical and unnecessary. A width of 7 feet strikes the right balance, ensuring both vehicles can park side by side without difficulty, while also fitting within common residential design standards.