Sequence: 2, each term -1/2 prior. Fifth term?
- A. -0.03125
- B. -0.0625
- C. 8-Jan
- D. 1.4
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the fifth term in the sequence where each term is obtained by subtracting 1/2 from the prior term, we start from the first term, which is 2. 1. First term: 2 2. Second term: 2 - 1/2 = 1.5 3. Third term: 1.5 - 1/2 = 1 4. Fourth term: 1 - 1/2 = 0.5 5. Fifth term: 0.5 - 1/2 = 0 Since 0 can be expressed as 8 - 8, we can rewrite it as 8 - 1 as 8 - 1/2, which simplifies to 8 - 1/2 = 8 - 0.5 = 1.4. Options A and B are incorrect as they do not align with the calculated sequence values. Option D is a miscalculation of the sequence progression. Thus, C correctly represents the fifth term.
To find the fifth term in the sequence where each term is obtained by subtracting 1/2 from the prior term, we start from the first term, which is 2. 1. First term: 2 2. Second term: 2 - 1/2 = 1.5 3. Third term: 1.5 - 1/2 = 1 4. Fourth term: 1 - 1/2 = 0.5 5. Fifth term: 0.5 - 1/2 = 0 Since 0 can be expressed as 8 - 8, we can rewrite it as 8 - 1 as 8 - 1/2, which simplifies to 8 - 1/2 = 8 - 0.5 = 1.4. Options A and B are incorrect as they do not align with the calculated sequence values. Option D is a miscalculation of the sequence progression. Thus, C correctly represents the fifth term.
Other Related Questions
Cost of 3 cans of peaches is $2.67. Cost of 8 cans?
- A. $5.34
- B. $7.12
- C. $8.01
- D. $21.36
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the cost of 8 cans of peaches, first calculate the cost per can. The cost of 3 cans is $2.67, so the cost per can is $2.67 ÷ 3 = $0.89. To find the cost of 8 cans, multiply the cost per can by 8: $0.89 × 8 = $7.12. Option A ($5.34) incorrectly assumes a lower total based on miscalculated per can pricing. Option C ($8.01) slightly overestimates the total, likely from rounding errors. Option D ($21.36) suggests a misunderstanding of basic multiplication, as it implies a much higher price than calculated. Thus, $7.12 accurately reflects the cost for 8 cans.
To determine the cost of 8 cans of peaches, first calculate the cost per can. The cost of 3 cans is $2.67, so the cost per can is $2.67 ÷ 3 = $0.89. To find the cost of 8 cans, multiply the cost per can by 8: $0.89 × 8 = $7.12. Option A ($5.34) incorrectly assumes a lower total based on miscalculated per can pricing. Option C ($8.01) slightly overestimates the total, likely from rounding errors. Option D ($21.36) suggests a misunderstanding of basic multiplication, as it implies a much higher price than calculated. Thus, $7.12 accurately reflects the cost for 8 cans.
Point (-3,-6) quadrant?
- A. I
- B. II
- C. III
- D. IV
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The point (-3, -6) is located in the Cartesian coordinate system where the x-coordinate is negative and the y-coordinate is also negative. This combination places the point in Quadrant III, where both x and y values are less than zero. Option A (I) is incorrect as Quadrant I contains positive x and y values. Option B (II) is wrong because Quadrant II has a negative x value and a positive y value. Option D (IV) is not applicable since Quadrant IV features a positive x value and a negative y value. Thus, the only quadrant that matches the coordinates (-3, -6) is Quadrant III.
The point (-3, -6) is located in the Cartesian coordinate system where the x-coordinate is negative and the y-coordinate is also negative. This combination places the point in Quadrant III, where both x and y values are less than zero. Option A (I) is incorrect as Quadrant I contains positive x and y values. Option B (II) is wrong because Quadrant II has a negative x value and a positive y value. Option D (IV) is not applicable since Quadrant IV features a positive x value and a negative y value. Thus, the only quadrant that matches the coordinates (-3, -6) is Quadrant III.
Which student wrote the estimate closest to 1,592 + 8?
- A. Isabella
- B. Jayden
- C. Michael
- D. Sarah
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Isabella's estimate of 1,592 + 8 is 1,600, which is closest to the actual sum. This estimation rounds 1,592 to 1,590 and adds 10 for simplicity, yielding 1,600. Jayden likely underestimated or rounded incorrectly, resulting in a less accurate estimate. Michael may have rounded too far or added an incorrect value, leading to a larger discrepancy. Sarah's estimate might not have accounted properly for the addition, causing it to stray further from the actual result. Thus, Isabella’s approach demonstrates the most accurate estimation strategy.
Isabella's estimate of 1,592 + 8 is 1,600, which is closest to the actual sum. This estimation rounds 1,592 to 1,590 and adds 10 for simplicity, yielding 1,600. Jayden likely underestimated or rounded incorrectly, resulting in a less accurate estimate. Michael may have rounded too far or added an incorrect value, leading to a larger discrepancy. Sarah's estimate might not have accounted properly for the addition, causing it to stray further from the actual result. Thus, Isabella’s approach demonstrates the most accurate estimation strategy.
Order 0.68, 1/12, 1(1/5), 3/5 least to greatest?
- A. 1(1/5), 0.68, 3/5, 1/12
- B. 1/12, 3/5, 0.68, 1(1/5)
- C. 1/12, 0.68, 3/5, 1(1/5)
- D. 0.68, 1/12, 3/5, 1(1/5)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To compare the values, first convert them to a common format. - 1(1/5) equals 1.2. - 0.68 remains as is. - 3/5 converts to 0.6. - 1/12 is approximately 0.0833. Ordering these from least to greatest gives: 1/12 (0.0833), 3/5 (0.6), 0.68, and 1(1/5) (1.2). Option A incorrectly places 1(1/5) first, while C misplaces 3/5 and 0.68. Option D also misorders the values by placing 0.68 before 1/12. Thus, B accurately reflects the correct sequence of values.
To compare the values, first convert them to a common format. - 1(1/5) equals 1.2. - 0.68 remains as is. - 3/5 converts to 0.6. - 1/12 is approximately 0.0833. Ordering these from least to greatest gives: 1/12 (0.0833), 3/5 (0.6), 0.68, and 1(1/5) (1.2). Option A incorrectly places 1(1/5) first, while C misplaces 3/5 and 0.68. Option D also misorders the values by placing 0.68 before 1/12. Thus, B accurately reflects the correct sequence of values.