Compare 3 in 123,456 to others.
436,521 315,624 126,354 642,135
- A. 100x_____
- B. 10x_____
- C. 0.1x_____
- D. 0.01x_____
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B,A,C,D
To determine the appropriate multiplier for each number, we analyze their values: - **B: 10x_____** is valid as multiplying by 10 shifts the decimal point one place to the right, increasing the value significantly, making it suitable for larger numbers like 436,521 and 315,624. - **A: 100x_____** is also applicable, as multiplying by 100 shifts the decimal two places, further increasing the value. However, it is not the most fitting choice for the context of smaller increments. - **C: 0.1x_____** indicates a decrease in value, which applies to smaller numbers but is less relevant for the context of significant values like 126,354. - **D: 0.01x_____** further diminishes the number, making it the least appropriate option for the given values, as it reduces the numbers excessively. In conclusion, B is the best fit for maintaining relevance to the larger values, while A, C, and D serve progressively less appropriate roles.
To determine the appropriate multiplier for each number, we analyze their values: - **B: 10x_____** is valid as multiplying by 10 shifts the decimal point one place to the right, increasing the value significantly, making it suitable for larger numbers like 436,521 and 315,624. - **A: 100x_____** is also applicable, as multiplying by 100 shifts the decimal two places, further increasing the value. However, it is not the most fitting choice for the context of smaller increments. - **C: 0.1x_____** indicates a decrease in value, which applies to smaller numbers but is less relevant for the context of significant values like 126,354. - **D: 0.01x_____** further diminishes the number, making it the least appropriate option for the given values, as it reduces the numbers excessively. In conclusion, B is the best fit for maintaining relevance to the larger values, while A, C, and D serve progressively less appropriate roles.
Other Related Questions
Favorite food via survey numbers. Best measure?
- A. Mean
- B. Median
- C. Mode
- D. Mean+median
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
When analyzing survey data on favorite foods, the mode is the best measure since it identifies the most frequently chosen option, reflecting the popular preference among respondents. The mean can be skewed by outliers, making it less reliable in this context. The median, while useful for understanding the middle value, does not capture the most popular choice effectively. Combining mean and median (option D) does not address the core goal of identifying the favorite food, which is best represented by the mode. Thus, the mode provides a clear insight into the most favored food item.
When analyzing survey data on favorite foods, the mode is the best measure since it identifies the most frequently chosen option, reflecting the popular preference among respondents. The mean can be skewed by outliers, making it less reliable in this context. The median, while useful for understanding the middle value, does not capture the most popular choice effectively. Combining mean and median (option D) does not address the core goal of identifying the favorite food, which is best represented by the mode. Thus, the mode provides a clear insight into the most favored food item.
36 pencils in equal groups? Select THREE.
- A. 3
- B. 4
- C. 5
- D. 6
- E. 8
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A,B,D
To determine how many equal groups can be formed from 36 pencils, we need to identify the factors of 36. Option A (3) is valid because 36 ÷ 3 = 12, resulting in 12 pencils per group. Option B (4) is also correct since 36 ÷ 4 = 9, yielding 9 pencils per group. Option D (6) works as well, as 36 ÷ 6 = 6, giving 6 pencils per group. Options C (5) and E (8) are incorrect because 36 is not divisible by 5 (36 ÷ 5 = 7.2, which is not a whole number) and 8 (36 ÷ 8 = 4.5, also not a whole number). Thus, only 3, 4, and 6 are valid factors of 36.
To determine how many equal groups can be formed from 36 pencils, we need to identify the factors of 36. Option A (3) is valid because 36 ÷ 3 = 12, resulting in 12 pencils per group. Option B (4) is also correct since 36 ÷ 4 = 9, yielding 9 pencils per group. Option D (6) works as well, as 36 ÷ 6 = 6, giving 6 pencils per group. Options C (5) and E (8) are incorrect because 36 is not divisible by 5 (36 ÷ 5 = 7.2, which is not a whole number) and 8 (36 ÷ 8 = 4.5, also not a whole number). Thus, only 3, 4, and 6 are valid factors of 36.
178-degree angle?
- A. Acute
- B. Obtuse
- C. Right
- D. Straight
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
An angle measuring 178 degrees is classified as obtuse, as it is greater than 90 degrees but less than 180 degrees. Option A, acute, refers to angles less than 90 degrees, which does not apply here. Option C, right, denotes a 90-degree angle, clearly not fitting for 178 degrees. Option D, straight, describes a 180-degree angle, which is also not applicable since 178 degrees is slightly less than that. Thus, the only suitable classification for a 178-degree angle is obtuse.
An angle measuring 178 degrees is classified as obtuse, as it is greater than 90 degrees but less than 180 degrees. Option A, acute, refers to angles less than 90 degrees, which does not apply here. Option C, right, denotes a 90-degree angle, clearly not fitting for 178 degrees. Option D, straight, describes a 180-degree angle, which is also not applicable since 178 degrees is slightly less than that. Thus, the only suitable classification for a 178-degree angle is obtuse.
Equivalent to 2(4f+2g)? Select ALL.
- A. 4*(2f+g)
- B. 4(2f+2g)
- C. 2f(4+2g)
- D. 16f+4g
- E. 8f+2g
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A,F
To determine which expressions are equivalent to \( 2(4f + 2g) \), we first simplify it: \[ 2(4f + 2g) = 8f + 4g \] Now, let's analyze each option: **A: \( 4(2f + g) \)** This expands to \( 8f + 4g \), matching our simplified expression. **B: \( 4(2f + 2g) \)** This simplifies to \( 8f + 8g \), which does not match \( 8f + 4g \). **C: \( 2f(4 + 2g) \)** This expands to \( 8f + 4fg \), introducing an extra term \( 4fg \) that makes it unequal. **D: \( 16f + 4g \)** This expression has \( 16f \), which is double the \( 8f \) we expect, thus it is not equivalent. **E: \( 8f + 2g \)** Here, while \( 8f \) matches, \( 2g \) does not equal \( 4g \), making it non-equivalent. **F: \( 8f + 4g \)** This matches our simplified expression exactly, confirming its equivalence. In summary, options A and F correctly represent the original expression, while B, C, D, and E do not.
To determine which expressions are equivalent to \( 2(4f + 2g) \), we first simplify it: \[ 2(4f + 2g) = 8f + 4g \] Now, let's analyze each option: **A: \( 4(2f + g) \)** This expands to \( 8f + 4g \), matching our simplified expression. **B: \( 4(2f + 2g) \)** This simplifies to \( 8f + 8g \), which does not match \( 8f + 4g \). **C: \( 2f(4 + 2g) \)** This expands to \( 8f + 4fg \), introducing an extra term \( 4fg \) that makes it unequal. **D: \( 16f + 4g \)** This expression has \( 16f \), which is double the \( 8f \) we expect, thus it is not equivalent. **E: \( 8f + 2g \)** Here, while \( 8f \) matches, \( 2g \) does not equal \( 4g \), making it non-equivalent. **F: \( 8f + 4g \)** This matches our simplified expression exactly, confirming its equivalence. In summary, options A and F correctly represent the original expression, while B, C, D, and E do not.