In 1908, a huge explosion known as the Tunguska Event flattened trees for miles across a remote area of Russia. Scientists now think an asteroid or a comet entered Earth's atmosphere, causing the explosion. Ice core samples from an ice sheet in Greenland reveal signs of this enormous explosion: deposits of ammonia equal to 5 micrograms per square meter. But how exactly did these telltale molecules form?
• Hypothesis 1: The Tunguska explosion started forest fires, known to produce ammonia. Data indicates that such fires would have deposited an amount of ammonia over the Northern Hemisphere equaling 0.1 micrograms per square meter.
• Hypothesis 2: Up to 1% of the object's mass might have been ammonia, and this ammonia might have spread over the Northern Hemisphere. Approximately 0.00005 micrograms of ammonia per square meter are predicted by this hypothesis.
• Hypothesis 3: Since many compounds form in the presence of high heat, the ammonia could
have been produced as the falling object heated the atmosphere. However, heat alone is not
sufficient to cause the formation of ammonia.
• Hypothesis 4: As it passed through the atmosphere, the object pushed air in front of it at high pressure. Nitrogen and hydrogen combine to form ammonia under similar pressure. Considering the amount of hydrogen expected in a comet and the available nitrogen in Earth's atmosphere, approximately 5 micrograms of ammonia per square meter would have been deposited under this hypothesis.
Which statement describes a weakness of the investigation in the passage?
- A. None of the hypotheses are directly related to the ice core data.
- B. The Greenland ice sheet is far away from the site of the explosion in Russia.
- C. Several of the hypotheses rely on unproven processes or estimated values.
- D. A few micrograms of ammonia is insufficient evidence for a conclusion.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Option C highlights a significant weakness, as relying on unproven processes or estimated values can lead to unreliable conclusions, undermining the investigation's credibility. Option A is incorrect because hypotheses can be related to data in broader contexts, even if not directly. Option B misrepresents the geographical relevance; distance alone does not invalidate the connection between the ice core data and the explosion. Option D, while suggesting a concern about evidence quantity, does not address the fundamental issue of reliance on unproven processes that can skew the investigation's outcomes.
Option C highlights a significant weakness, as relying on unproven processes or estimated values can lead to unreliable conclusions, undermining the investigation's credibility. Option A is incorrect because hypotheses can be related to data in broader contexts, even if not directly. Option B misrepresents the geographical relevance; distance alone does not invalidate the connection between the ice core data and the explosion. Option D, while suggesting a concern about evidence quantity, does not address the fundamental issue of reliance on unproven processes that can skew the investigation's outcomes.
Other Related Questions
Which statement correctly summarizes this information?
- A. Hemochromatosis is a dominant genetic disease caused by a single mutation.
- B. Hemochromatosis is a recessive genetic disease, but is caused by a lack of iron.
- C. Hemochromatosis is a recessive genetic disease, but the expression differs in individuals.
- D. Hemochromatosis is a dominant genetic disease that can be caused by several different alleles.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Hemochromatosis is indeed a recessive genetic disorder, meaning that two copies of the mutated gene are typically required for the disease to manifest. Option A incorrectly categorizes it as a dominant disease, which does not align with its genetic inheritance pattern. Option B misstates the condition, as hemochromatosis is characterized by iron overload, not a deficiency. Option D also misrepresents the disease; while there are different alleles involved, hemochromatosis is primarily recessive, not dominant, making option C the most accurate summary of the information.
Hemochromatosis is indeed a recessive genetic disorder, meaning that two copies of the mutated gene are typically required for the disease to manifest. Option A incorrectly categorizes it as a dominant disease, which does not align with its genetic inheritance pattern. Option B misstates the condition, as hemochromatosis is characterized by iron overload, not a deficiency. Option D also misrepresents the disease; while there are different alleles involved, hemochromatosis is primarily recessive, not dominant, making option C the most accurate summary of the information.
Placing solid ammonium nitrate, NH4NO3, in a container of water causes an endothermic reaction. The result is ammonium hydroxide, NH4OH, and nitric acid, HNO3. Which diagram shows the correct equation for the reaction?
- A. NH4OH + HNO3 → NH4NO3 + H2O + energy
- B. NH4NO3 + H2O + energy → NH4OH + HNO3
- C. NH4NO3 + H2O → NH4OH + HNO3 + energy
- D. NH4OH + HNO3 + energy → NH4NO3 + H2O
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
The reaction between solid ammonium nitrate and water is endothermic, meaning it absorbs energy. Thus, the equation must reflect the consumption of energy during the process. Option B correctly shows that ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) and water react to form ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) and nitric acid (HNO3), while requiring energy input. Option A incorrectly suggests energy is released, which contradicts the endothermic nature of the reaction. Option C implies that energy is produced, which is also incorrect. Option D similarly misrepresents the reaction by suggesting energy is released, aligning with an exothermic process rather than the observed endothermic reaction.
The reaction between solid ammonium nitrate and water is endothermic, meaning it absorbs energy. Thus, the equation must reflect the consumption of energy during the process. Option B correctly shows that ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) and water react to form ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) and nitric acid (HNO3), while requiring energy input. Option A incorrectly suggests energy is released, which contradicts the endothermic nature of the reaction. Option C implies that energy is produced, which is also incorrect. Option D similarly misrepresents the reaction by suggesting energy is released, aligning with an exothermic process rather than the observed endothermic reaction.
Why is the conclusion about gene variation among cheetahs from Sommer's research more valid than the conclusion from O'Brien's research?
- A. Sommer's research was conducted more recently than O'Brien's
- B. Sommer's research used a different population of cheetahs than O'Brien's
- C. Sommer's conclusion is about disease response, while O'Brien's is about skin grafts.
- D. Sommer's conclusion is based on examining the genes, while O'Brien's conclusion is based on acceptance of a skin graft.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Sommer's conclusion is more valid as it directly examines gene variation, providing a clearer understanding of genetic factors influencing traits. This direct analysis allows for more reliable insights into gene functionality. In contrast, O'Brien's research focuses on skin graft acceptance, which, while informative, does not provide the same depth of genetic examination. Option A is incorrect as recency does not inherently validate research findings. Option B is misleading; differing populations may affect findings but do not necessarily validate one conclusion over another. Option C misrepresents the focus of the studies; both are relevant but differ in application rather than validity.
Sommer's conclusion is more valid as it directly examines gene variation, providing a clearer understanding of genetic factors influencing traits. This direct analysis allows for more reliable insights into gene functionality. In contrast, O'Brien's research focuses on skin graft acceptance, which, while informative, does not provide the same depth of genetic examination. Option A is incorrect as recency does not inherently validate research findings. Option B is misleading; differing populations may affect findings but do not necessarily validate one conclusion over another. Option C misrepresents the focus of the studies; both are relevant but differ in application rather than validity.
Which statement describes one feature of the Rutherford-Bohr atom model that the Thomson model does not share?
- A. The Rutherford-Bohr model identifies different elements by the numbers of particles present.
- B. The Rutherford-Bohr model maintains the observed neutral charge of atoms.
- C. The Rutherford-Bohr model correctly describes the types of particles in the atom.
- D. The Rutherford-Bohr model restricts the positive charge of the atom to the nucleus.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The Rutherford-Bohr model uniquely restricts the atom's positive charge to the nucleus, a significant advancement over the Thomson model, which depicts a diffuse positive charge throughout the atom. Option A is incorrect as both models can identify elements based on particle numbers, but the Rutherford-Bohr model adds more detail about electron arrangements. Option B is misleading; both models account for atomic neutrality, but the Rutherford-Bohr model provides a clearer structure. Option C is also inaccurate; while the Rutherford-Bohr model describes particles more accurately, it does not fundamentally change the types of particles present compared to Thomson's model.
The Rutherford-Bohr model uniquely restricts the atom's positive charge to the nucleus, a significant advancement over the Thomson model, which depicts a diffuse positive charge throughout the atom. Option A is incorrect as both models can identify elements based on particle numbers, but the Rutherford-Bohr model adds more detail about electron arrangements. Option B is misleading; both models account for atomic neutrality, but the Rutherford-Bohr model provides a clearer structure. Option C is also inaccurate; while the Rutherford-Bohr model describes particles more accurately, it does not fundamentally change the types of particles present compared to Thomson's model.