Scientists have examined the genetic history of a large group of cheetahs and have found that
there was a significant decrease in the genetic diversity of the cheetah species about 10,000 years
ago. Scientists found that, even in unrelated groups of cheetahs, individual cheetahs had 99% of
the same alleles. By comparison, in a genetically diverse population, even closely related
individuals contain only 80% of the same alleles. Genetic diversity is important to the survival of a
species, and scientists worry that a disease that cheetahs are not resistant to could decimate the
population.
Major histocompatibility complex (MC) genes are used by the body to identify self from non-self
and direct the immune system to attack non-self particles. Invading bacteria and viruses do not
contain the same MHC genes and therefore are attacked by the immune system. Within a
population, a high diversity of MHC genes protects the population from attack by disease. In a
highly diverse population, it is likely that at least some individuals will contain an allele that
identifies a new disease as non-self and can direct the immune system to destroy it.
In 1985, research by Stephen O'Brien reported that skin grafts from cheetahs in a zoo in Oregon
were accepted by cheetahs in Africa. Skin grafts, like other organ donations, must be between
Individuals that have the same MHC factors. If any of the genetic factors are different, then the
immune system of the individual receiving the organ will identify the organ as non-self and the
body will attack the donated organ as if it were a foreign organism such as a virus or bacterium.
The conclusion from
O'Brien's research was that cheetah MHC genes are as alike as those of identical twins.
More recent research by Simone Sommer took a much more comprehensive approach to
examining the genes of a large sample of wild cheetahs. Sommer's research determined how
many alleles are present on two different types of MHC genes in approximately 150 cheetahs.
Sommer was able to show that the variation in some MHC genes was higher than previously
thought. The variation in MHC genes in cheetahs is still smaller than that for other big cat species
but appears to be sufficient to allow the populations to identify a wide variety of foreign particles.
Why is the conclusion about gene variation among cheetahs from Sommer's research more valid than the conclusion from O'Brien's research?
- A. Sommer's research was conducted more recently than O'Brien's
- B. Sommer's research used a different population of cheetahs than O'Brien's
- C. Sommer's conclusion is about disease response, while O'Brien's is about skin grafts.
- D. Sommer's conclusion is based on examining the genes, while O'Brien's conclusion is based on acceptance of a skin graft.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Sommer's conclusion is more valid as it directly examines gene variation, providing a clearer understanding of genetic factors influencing traits. This direct analysis allows for more reliable insights into gene functionality. In contrast, O'Brien's research focuses on skin graft acceptance, which, while informative, does not provide the same depth of genetic examination. Option A is incorrect as recency does not inherently validate research findings. Option B is misleading; differing populations may affect findings but do not necessarily validate one conclusion over another. Option C misrepresents the focus of the studies; both are relevant but differ in application rather than validity.
Sommer's conclusion is more valid as it directly examines gene variation, providing a clearer understanding of genetic factors influencing traits. This direct analysis allows for more reliable insights into gene functionality. In contrast, O'Brien's research focuses on skin graft acceptance, which, while informative, does not provide the same depth of genetic examination. Option A is incorrect as recency does not inherently validate research findings. Option B is misleading; differing populations may affect findings but do not necessarily validate one conclusion over another. Option C misrepresents the focus of the studies; both are relevant but differ in application rather than validity.
Other Related Questions
The equation for photosynthesis is often written as shown below. Based on this equation, what does the triangle symbol represent?
- A. oxygen
- B. chloroplast
- C. heat
- D. light
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
In the equation for photosynthesis, the triangle symbol represents light, which is essential for the process to occur. Plants capture light energy to convert carbon dioxide and water into glucose and oxygen. Option A, oxygen, is a product of photosynthesis but not represented by the triangle. Option B, chloroplast, is the organelle where photosynthesis takes place, but it is not indicated by the triangle symbol. Option C, heat, is not a direct component of the photosynthesis equation, as it does not play a role in the conversion process. Thus, light is the critical factor denoted by the triangle.
In the equation for photosynthesis, the triangle symbol represents light, which is essential for the process to occur. Plants capture light energy to convert carbon dioxide and water into glucose and oxygen. Option A, oxygen, is a product of photosynthesis but not represented by the triangle. Option B, chloroplast, is the organelle where photosynthesis takes place, but it is not indicated by the triangle symbol. Option C, heat, is not a direct component of the photosynthesis equation, as it does not play a role in the conversion process. Thus, light is the critical factor denoted by the triangle.
The roller coaster diagram shows a set of cars moving downward from position 1 to position 2. As the cars travel from position 1 toward position 2, their...
- A. gravitational potential energy; total energy
- B. kinetic energy; gravitational potential energy
- C. total energy; kinetic energy
- D. gravitational potential energy; kinetic energy
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
As the roller coaster cars move from position 1 to position 2, they descend, resulting in a decrease in gravitational potential energy due to their lower height. However, their total energy—comprising both kinetic and potential energy—remains constant, assuming negligible friction. Option B incorrectly suggests that kinetic energy increases while gravitational potential energy decreases, but it does not address total energy. Option C misrepresents the relationship by stating total energy changes, which it does not. Option D also fails, as it inaccurately implies that gravitational potential energy is the only energy type being discussed.
As the roller coaster cars move from position 1 to position 2, they descend, resulting in a decrease in gravitational potential energy due to their lower height. However, their total energy—comprising both kinetic and potential energy—remains constant, assuming negligible friction. Option B incorrectly suggests that kinetic energy increases while gravitational potential energy decreases, but it does not address total energy. Option C misrepresents the relationship by stating total energy changes, which it does not. Option D also fails, as it inaccurately implies that gravitational potential energy is the only energy type being discussed.
If these results correctly predict the performance of this kneepad design, what is the probability that one of the kneepads will require a force of 145 N or greater to cause failure?
- A. 53%
- B. 22%
- C. 75%
- D. 25%
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the probability of a kneepad requiring a force of 145 N or greater to cause failure, we analyze the data provided. The correct option, 25%, indicates that one-fourth of the kneepads are expected to fail under this force, aligning with statistical predictions for this design. Option A (53%) overestimates the likelihood, suggesting more than half will fail, which is not supported by the data. Option B (22%) underestimates the probability, indicating fewer kneepads will fail than expected. Option C (75%) is excessively high, implying a significant majority would fail, which contradicts the predicted performance. Thus, 25% accurately reflects the failure rate at this force threshold.
To determine the probability of a kneepad requiring a force of 145 N or greater to cause failure, we analyze the data provided. The correct option, 25%, indicates that one-fourth of the kneepads are expected to fail under this force, aligning with statistical predictions for this design. Option A (53%) overestimates the likelihood, suggesting more than half will fail, which is not supported by the data. Option B (22%) underestimates the probability, indicating fewer kneepads will fail than expected. Option C (75%) is excessively high, implying a significant majority would fail, which contradicts the predicted performance. Thus, 25% accurately reflects the failure rate at this force threshold.
Scientists can indirectly observe temperatures and insolation (the Intensity or direct solar radiation) in the distant past by measuring oxygen isotope ratios in ice cores collected from polar ice. The graph presents data for the period from what ta200.000 years ago. What time period in the graph shows the greatest correlation between Milankovitch cycles and climate?
- A. 140,000-160,000 years ago
- B. 120,000-140,000 years ago
- C. 100,000-120,000 years ago
- D. 160,000-180,000 years ago
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The time period from 100,000 to 120,000 years ago exhibits the greatest correlation between Milankovitch cycles and climate, as evidenced by significant fluctuations in temperature and insolation reflected in the oxygen isotope ratios. This interval aligns closely with the timing of glacial and interglacial periods influenced by Earth's orbital changes. Options A and B show notable climate changes, but they do not align as strongly with Milankovitch cycles, indicating less correlation. Option D, while part of the broader glacial cycle, reveals less pronounced temperature shifts, making it less relevant to the question of correlation.
The time period from 100,000 to 120,000 years ago exhibits the greatest correlation between Milankovitch cycles and climate, as evidenced by significant fluctuations in temperature and insolation reflected in the oxygen isotope ratios. This interval aligns closely with the timing of glacial and interglacial periods influenced by Earth's orbital changes. Options A and B show notable climate changes, but they do not align as strongly with Milankovitch cycles, indicating less correlation. Option D, while part of the broader glacial cycle, reveals less pronounced temperature shifts, making it less relevant to the question of correlation.