Which of the following integers, when rounded to the nearest thousand, results in 2,000?
- A. 2,567
- B. 1,499
- C. 1,097
- D. 1,601
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: d
When rounding to the nearest thousand, we look at the hundreds digit. If it is 5 or higher, we round up; if it is 4 or lower, we round down. Option D (1,601) rounds to 2,000 because the hundreds digit (6) is greater than 5, leading to an increase in the thousands place. Option A (2,567) rounds to 3,000, as the hundreds digit (5) prompts rounding up. Option B (1,499) rounds to 1,000 since the hundreds digit (4) indicates rounding down. Option C (1,097) also rounds to 1,000 for the same reason as B. Thus, only D rounds to 2,000.
When rounding to the nearest thousand, we look at the hundreds digit. If it is 5 or higher, we round up; if it is 4 or lower, we round down. Option D (1,601) rounds to 2,000 because the hundreds digit (6) is greater than 5, leading to an increase in the thousands place. Option A (2,567) rounds to 3,000, as the hundreds digit (5) prompts rounding up. Option B (1,499) rounds to 1,000 since the hundreds digit (4) indicates rounding down. Option C (1,097) also rounds to 1,000 for the same reason as B. Thus, only D rounds to 2,000.
Other Related Questions
At the Crest Coffee Shop, the cost of a plain bagel was $0.75 last year. This year the cost of a plain bagel is $0.90. By what percent did the cost of a plain bagel increase from last year to this year?
- A. 10%
- B. 15%
- C. 17%
- D. 20%
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the percent increase in the cost of a plain bagel, the formula used is: \[ \text{Percent Increase} = \left( \frac{\text{New Price} - \text{Old Price}}{\text{Old Price}} \right) \times 100 \] Substituting the given values: \[ \text{Percent Increase} = \left( \frac{0.90 - 0.75}{0.75} \right) \times 100 = \left( \frac{0.15}{0.75} \right) \times 100 = 20\% \] Option A (10%) underestimates the increase, while B (15%) and C (17%) also fail to reflect the correct calculation. Therefore, the accurate calculation confirms a 20% increase in cost.
To determine the percent increase in the cost of a plain bagel, the formula used is: \[ \text{Percent Increase} = \left( \frac{\text{New Price} - \text{Old Price}}{\text{Old Price}} \right) \times 100 \] Substituting the given values: \[ \text{Percent Increase} = \left( \frac{0.90 - 0.75}{0.75} \right) \times 100 = \left( \frac{0.15}{0.75} \right) \times 100 = 20\% \] Option A (10%) underestimates the increase, while B (15%) and C (17%) also fail to reflect the correct calculation. Therefore, the accurate calculation confirms a 20% increase in cost.
Harriet took 48 minutes to ride her bike the distance from her house to the town library. If she rode at a constant rate, what fraction of the total distance did she ride in the first 12 minutes?
- A. 1/4
- B. 1/3
- C. 1/2
- D. 3/4
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine the fraction of the total distance Harriet rode in the first 12 minutes, we start by recognizing that she took 48 minutes for the entire trip. Riding at a constant rate means that her distance covered is proportional to the time spent riding. In 12 minutes, which is one-fourth of the total 48 minutes, she would have covered one-fourth of the total distance. Thus, the fraction of the total distance she rode in the first 12 minutes is 1/4. Options B (1/3), C (1/2), and D (3/4) misrepresent the proportion of time to total time. Each suggests a greater fraction than what corresponds to 12 minutes relative to 48 minutes, leading to incorrect conclusions about the distance covered.
To determine the fraction of the total distance Harriet rode in the first 12 minutes, we start by recognizing that she took 48 minutes for the entire trip. Riding at a constant rate means that her distance covered is proportional to the time spent riding. In 12 minutes, which is one-fourth of the total 48 minutes, she would have covered one-fourth of the total distance. Thus, the fraction of the total distance she rode in the first 12 minutes is 1/4. Options B (1/3), C (1/2), and D (3/4) misrepresent the proportion of time to total time. Each suggests a greater fraction than what corresponds to 12 minutes relative to 48 minutes, leading to incorrect conclusions about the distance covered.
Which of the four labeled points on the number line above has coordinate-?
- A. A
- B. B
- C. C
- D. D
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Point B is positioned at the coordinate -2 on the number line, making it the accurate choice. Point A is located at -1, which is not the specified coordinate. Point C is at 0, representing the origin, and thus does not match the target coordinate. Point D is found at 1, clearly outside the negative range required. Each of these points is distinctly marked, confirming that only Point B aligns with the coordinate of -2. This clarity in placement reinforces the understanding of negative values on a number line.
Point B is positioned at the coordinate -2 on the number line, making it the accurate choice. Point A is located at -1, which is not the specified coordinate. Point C is at 0, representing the origin, and thus does not match the target coordinate. Point D is found at 1, clearly outside the negative range required. Each of these points is distinctly marked, confirming that only Point B aligns with the coordinate of -2. This clarity in placement reinforces the understanding of negative values on a number line.
165 is what percent of 150?
- A. 95%
- B. 110%
- C. 111%
- D. 115%
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To find what percent 165 is of 150, divide 165 by 150 and then multiply by 100. This calculation yields 110%, indicating that 165 is 110% of 150. Option A (95%) is incorrect as it underestimates the relationship between the two numbers. Option C (111%) slightly overestimates the value, while Option D (115%) significantly exaggerates it. Each of these options fails to accurately represent the proportion of 165 to 150, reinforcing that 110% is the precise measure of this relationship.
To find what percent 165 is of 150, divide 165 by 150 and then multiply by 100. This calculation yields 110%, indicating that 165 is 110% of 150. Option A (95%) is incorrect as it underestimates the relationship between the two numbers. Option C (111%) slightly overestimates the value, while Option D (115%) significantly exaggerates it. Each of these options fails to accurately represent the proportion of 165 to 150, reinforcing that 110% is the precise measure of this relationship.