Multiplying a certain nonzero number by 0.01 gives the same result as dividing the number by
- A. 100
- B. 10
- C. 1/10
- D. 1/100
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
When a nonzero number is multiplied by 0.01, it is equivalent to dividing that number by 100. This is because multiplying by 0.01 (or 1/100) reduces the value of the number to one-hundredth of its original amount. Option B (10) is incorrect as dividing by 10 would yield a larger result than multiplying by 0.01. Option C (1/10) is also wrong because dividing by 1/10 actually increases the number, contrary to the operation of multiplying by 0.01. Option D (1/100) might seem close, but it represents the multiplication factor rather than the division needed. Thus, dividing by 100 accurately reflects the operation of multiplying by 0.01.
When a nonzero number is multiplied by 0.01, it is equivalent to dividing that number by 100. This is because multiplying by 0.01 (or 1/100) reduces the value of the number to one-hundredth of its original amount. Option B (10) is incorrect as dividing by 10 would yield a larger result than multiplying by 0.01. Option C (1/10) is also wrong because dividing by 1/10 actually increases the number, contrary to the operation of multiplying by 0.01. Option D (1/100) might seem close, but it represents the multiplication factor rather than the division needed. Thus, dividing by 100 accurately reflects the operation of multiplying by 0.01.
Other Related Questions
1,500 ÷ (15 + 5) =
- A. 75
- B. 130
- C. 315
- D. 400
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To solve the expression 1,500 ÷ (15 + 5), first calculate the sum inside the parentheses: 15 + 5 equals 20. Next, divide 1,500 by 20. Performing the division, 1,500 ÷ 20 equals 75, making option A the correct choice. Option B (130) results from incorrect calculations, possibly misapplying the division. Option C (315) may stem from an error in interpreting the division or addition. Option D (400) could arise from mistakenly multiplying instead of dividing. Thus, only option A accurately reflects the correct computation.
To solve the expression 1,500 ÷ (15 + 5), first calculate the sum inside the parentheses: 15 + 5 equals 20. Next, divide 1,500 by 20. Performing the division, 1,500 ÷ 20 equals 75, making option A the correct choice. Option B (130) results from incorrect calculations, possibly misapplying the division. Option C (315) may stem from an error in interpreting the division or addition. Option D (400) could arise from mistakenly multiplying instead of dividing. Thus, only option A accurately reflects the correct computation.
2/3 (6 + 1/2) =
- A. 4,1/3
- B. 4,1/2
- C. 5,1/2
- D. 6,1/3
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To solve \( \frac{2}{3}(6 + \frac{1}{2}) \), start by simplifying the expression inside the parentheses. \( 6 + \frac{1}{2} \) equals \( 6.5 \) or \( \frac{13}{2} \). Next, multiply \( \frac{2}{3} \) by \( \frac{13}{2} \): \[ \frac{2}{3} \times \frac{13}{2} = \frac{2 \times 13}{3 \times 2} = \frac{13}{3} = 4 \frac{1}{3} \] Option A is accurate. Option B (4,1/2) incorrectly adds an extra half. Option C (5,1/2) miscalculates the multiplication and addition. Option D (6,1/3) mistakenly assumes a higher total before multiplication.
To solve \( \frac{2}{3}(6 + \frac{1}{2}) \), start by simplifying the expression inside the parentheses. \( 6 + \frac{1}{2} \) equals \( 6.5 \) or \( \frac{13}{2} \). Next, multiply \( \frac{2}{3} \) by \( \frac{13}{2} \): \[ \frac{2}{3} \times \frac{13}{2} = \frac{2 \times 13}{3 \times 2} = \frac{13}{3} = 4 \frac{1}{3} \] Option A is accurate. Option B (4,1/2) incorrectly adds an extra half. Option C (5,1/2) miscalculates the multiplication and addition. Option D (6,1/3) mistakenly assumes a higher total before multiplication.
The large square above has sides of length 1. It is divided into smaller squares by dividing each side into 10 equal parts. In the figure, 3 full rows and 4 smaller squares in the next row are shaded. What is the area of the shaded region?
- A. 0.34
- B. 0.37
- C. 0.43
- D. 0.7
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine the area of the shaded region, first note that the large square has a side length of 1, resulting in a total area of 1 square unit. Each side is divided into 10 equal parts, creating a grid of 100 smaller squares, each with an area of 0.01 (1/100). In the figure, 3 full rows of squares are shaded, which accounts for 30 squares (3 rows x 10 squares per row). Additionally, 4 squares are shaded in the fourth row, bringing the total shaded squares to 34. Thus, the area of the shaded region is 34 squares x 0.01 = 0.34. Option B (0.37) incorrectly suggests 37 squares shaded. Option C (0.43) implies 43 squares, which is not possible given the shading described. Option D (0.7) overestimates the shaded area, miscounting the total squares shaded.
To determine the area of the shaded region, first note that the large square has a side length of 1, resulting in a total area of 1 square unit. Each side is divided into 10 equal parts, creating a grid of 100 smaller squares, each with an area of 0.01 (1/100). In the figure, 3 full rows of squares are shaded, which accounts for 30 squares (3 rows x 10 squares per row). Additionally, 4 squares are shaded in the fourth row, bringing the total shaded squares to 34. Thus, the area of the shaded region is 34 squares x 0.01 = 0.34. Option B (0.37) incorrectly suggests 37 squares shaded. Option C (0.43) implies 43 squares, which is not possible given the shading described. Option D (0.7) overestimates the shaded area, miscounting the total squares shaded.
Linda has borrowed 8 more books than Susan from the school library. Richard has borrowed half as many books as Linda has. If Richard has borrowed 17 books from the library, how many books has Susan borrowed?
- A. 25
- B. 26
- C. 34
- D. 42
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine how many books Susan has borrowed, start with Richard's 17 books. Since Richard has borrowed half as many books as Linda, Linda must have borrowed 34 books (17 x 2). Given that Linda has borrowed 8 more books than Susan, we can set up the equation: Linda's books = Susan's books + 8. Therefore, if Linda has 34 books, we find Susan's total by subtracting 8: 34 - 8 = 26. Option A (25) is incorrect as it underestimates Susan's total. Option C (34) mistakenly suggests Susan borrowed the same amount as Linda. Option D (42) overestimates Susan's total by not accounting for the difference of 8 books. Thus, the only valid option is 26.
To determine how many books Susan has borrowed, start with Richard's 17 books. Since Richard has borrowed half as many books as Linda, Linda must have borrowed 34 books (17 x 2). Given that Linda has borrowed 8 more books than Susan, we can set up the equation: Linda's books = Susan's books + 8. Therefore, if Linda has 34 books, we find Susan's total by subtracting 8: 34 - 8 = 26. Option A (25) is incorrect as it underestimates Susan's total. Option C (34) mistakenly suggests Susan borrowed the same amount as Linda. Option D (42) overestimates Susan's total by not accounting for the difference of 8 books. Thus, the only valid option is 26.