This passage uses information published in zutz ty die National Archives.
In 2012 workers at the National Archives preparing an exhibition of the records of immigrants discovered a 1951 document concerning teenaged Holocaust survivor Michael Pupa. Michael, whose parents died in the Holocaust, was one of many war orphans who came to the United States following World War II. Because of relief efforts made by the United Nations (UN) after the war, Pupa became a U.S. citizen in 1957.
These relief efforts were the result of the humanitarian crisis the United States and its allies faced after World War II. Millions of persons who had been forced to leave their homes needed to be resettled. The United States heavily supported and funded the creation of the International Refugee Organization (IRO) in 1946 by the United Nations, which was founded a year earlier.
Michael Pupa arrived in the United States in May of 1951. After living for six months in a United Nations home for refugee children, he moved to Cleveland, Ohio, where he was raised by a foster family and began his life as an American.
Which event occurred first?
- A. Michael moved to Ohio.
- B. Michael attained U.S. citizenship.
- C. The IRO was created.
- D. The UN was established.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the sequence of events, it’s essential to consider historical timelines. The United Nations (UN) was established in 1945, laying the groundwork for international cooperation. The International Refugee Organization (IRO) was created shortly after, in 1946, to address post-war refugee issues. Michael attaining U.S. citizenship likely occurred after these events, as it typically follows immigration processes. Lastly, Michael moving to Ohio would depend on his citizenship status and individual circumstances, making it the most recent event in this context.
To determine the sequence of events, it’s essential to consider historical timelines. The United Nations (UN) was established in 1945, laying the groundwork for international cooperation. The International Refugee Organization (IRO) was created shortly after, in 1946, to address post-war refugee issues. Michael attaining U.S. citizenship likely occurred after these events, as it typically follows immigration processes. Lastly, Michael moving to Ohio would depend on his citizenship status and individual circumstances, making it the most recent event in this context.
Other Related Questions
Which statement is correct about the change in racial and ethnic populations between 2000 and 2010?
- A. The Black or African American population had the greatest percentage of growth.
- B. The Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander population grew by a greater proportion than the Asian population.
- C. The White population experienced the slowest growth of all groups.
- D. The American Indian and Alaska Native population experienced almost no change.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Option B accurately reflects demographic trends, as the Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander population indeed saw a higher percentage increase compared to the Asian population during this period. Option A is incorrect; while the Black or African American population grew, it was not the greatest percentage increase among all racial groups. Option C misrepresents the data; although the White population's growth was slower compared to previous decades, it was not the slowest overall. Option D is misleading as well; the American Indian and Alaska Native population did experience some growth, albeit modest, rather than remaining unchanged.
Option B accurately reflects demographic trends, as the Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander population indeed saw a higher percentage increase compared to the Asian population during this period. Option A is incorrect; while the Black or African American population grew, it was not the greatest percentage increase among all racial groups. Option C misrepresents the data; although the White population's growth was slower compared to previous decades, it was not the slowest overall. Option D is misleading as well; the American Indian and Alaska Native population did experience some growth, albeit modest, rather than remaining unchanged.
This flow chart traces development of democratic government in England. Which event completes this sequence?
- A. The English Bill of Rights gave the king power to appoint most members of Parliament.
- B. The Magna Carta forced the nobles to give up their feudal lands.
- C. The English Bill of Rights guaranteed suffrage to most male citizens.
- D. The Magna Carta forced the king to share his political power.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The correct choice, D, highlights the Magna Carta's pivotal role in limiting the king's absolute power and initiating the concept of shared governance. This foundational document established that the monarch must consult nobles before making decisions, laying the groundwork for parliamentary democracy. Option A is incorrect as the English Bill of Rights actually limited the king's power over Parliament, not enhanced it. Option B misrepresents the Magna Carta's purpose; it did not force nobles to relinquish their lands, but rather addressed their grievances against the king. Option C is also inaccurate, as the English Bill of Rights did not guarantee suffrage but focused on limiting royal authority and protecting certain rights.
The correct choice, D, highlights the Magna Carta's pivotal role in limiting the king's absolute power and initiating the concept of shared governance. This foundational document established that the monarch must consult nobles before making decisions, laying the groundwork for parliamentary democracy. Option A is incorrect as the English Bill of Rights actually limited the king's power over Parliament, not enhanced it. Option B misrepresents the Magna Carta's purpose; it did not force nobles to relinquish their lands, but rather addressed their grievances against the king. Option C is also inaccurate, as the English Bill of Rights did not guarantee suffrage but focused on limiting royal authority and protecting certain rights.
Based on the information in this passage, which feature of ancient Roman government most influenced the Founders in framing the U.S. Constitution?
- A. A popularly elected representative vetoed legislation.
- B. Magistrates proposed laws.
- C. A system of checks and balances limited power.
- D. Senators elected the consuls.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The feature that most influenced the Founders in framing the U.S. Constitution is the system of checks and balances, which limited the power of government branches to prevent tyranny. This principle is evident in the U.S. system, where each branch can check the others, ensuring a balance of power. Option A is incorrect because while representatives play a role in legislation, the emphasis on a veto by a popularly elected official is not a defining characteristic of Roman governance. Option B, proposing laws by magistrates, describes a function of government but does not reflect the broader concept of power limitation. Option D incorrectly focuses on the election of consuls, which is less relevant to the Founders' emphasis on checks and balances.
The feature that most influenced the Founders in framing the U.S. Constitution is the system of checks and balances, which limited the power of government branches to prevent tyranny. This principle is evident in the U.S. system, where each branch can check the others, ensuring a balance of power. Option A is incorrect because while representatives play a role in legislation, the emphasis on a veto by a popularly elected official is not a defining characteristic of Roman governance. Option B, proposing laws by magistrates, describes a function of government but does not reflect the broader concept of power limitation. Option D incorrectly focuses on the election of consuls, which is less relevant to the Founders' emphasis on checks and balances.
According to this information, which philosopher would most likely support the presidential power to appoint federal judges with the consent of the U.S. Senate?
- A. Thomas Hobbes
- B. Baron de Montesquieu
- C. Jean-Jacques Rousseau
- D. John Locke
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Baron de Montesquieu advocated for the separation of powers within government, emphasizing the need for checks and balances to prevent tyranny. His support for a collaborative process in appointing judges aligns with the presidential power requiring Senate consent, ensuring that no single branch holds excessive authority. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, favored a strong central authority and would likely support concentrated power without the need for Senate approval. Jean-Jacques Rousseau emphasized the general will and popular sovereignty, which does not directly address the judicial appointment process. John Locke valued consent and governance but did not specifically advocate for the Senate's role in judicial appointments.
Baron de Montesquieu advocated for the separation of powers within government, emphasizing the need for checks and balances to prevent tyranny. His support for a collaborative process in appointing judges aligns with the presidential power requiring Senate consent, ensuring that no single branch holds excessive authority. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, favored a strong central authority and would likely support concentrated power without the need for Senate approval. Jean-Jacques Rousseau emphasized the general will and popular sovereignty, which does not directly address the judicial appointment process. John Locke valued consent and governance but did not specifically advocate for the Senate's role in judicial appointments.