The blog entry and speech excerpt below discuss the U.S. Supreme Court case of Tinker v. Des Moines (1969).
Blog
In the Tinker v. Des Moines case, the Court ruled that students lawfully exercised their rights when they wore black armbands in school as a protest against the Vietnam War. The ruling stated that school officials were wrong to suspend students from school for their act of protest. Students are not required to give up their rights when they enter a public school, especially freedom of speech, which is the foundation of democracy. These students modeled good citizenship by their actions. In contrast, school representatives placing restrictions on liberty provided a bad example to the future leaders of our country.
Speech
I believe the U.S. Supreme Court ruled correctly in Tinker v. Des Moines. Democracy requires individual expression, debate, and public protest. Still, freedom of speech is not the only issue to be considered when protests occur in public schools. School officials have a responsibility to provide a safe environment that is not disruptive to learning. Individual expression should not interfere with a school's mission to teach.
Which basic assumption is only behind the speech?
- A. Freedom of speech must be protected in schools.
- B. Citizens can express their views through symbols.
- C. Citizens should be able to express their views on issues.
- D. Freedom of speech has some restrictions
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The assumption that freedom of speech has some restrictions is solely focused on the speech itself, acknowledging that while individuals have the right to express themselves, this right is not absolute. Option A discusses the protection of speech specifically in schools, which implies a context rather than the nature of speech itself. Option B refers to expression through symbols, indicating non-verbal communication, thus not limited to speech. Option C emphasizes the ability to express views on issues broadly, again not confined to speech alone. Each of these options extends beyond the core principle of speech restrictions.
The assumption that freedom of speech has some restrictions is solely focused on the speech itself, acknowledging that while individuals have the right to express themselves, this right is not absolute. Option A discusses the protection of speech specifically in schools, which implies a context rather than the nature of speech itself. Option B refers to expression through symbols, indicating non-verbal communication, thus not limited to speech. Option C emphasizes the ability to express views on issues broadly, again not confined to speech alone. Each of these options extends beyond the core principle of speech restrictions.
Other Related Questions
Which statement from the excerpts provides evidence for the Inference that minority rights were not protected by the U.S. government as originally founded?
- A. "To the contrary, the government they devised was defective from the start, requiring several amendments, a civil war, and momentous social transformation to attain the system of constitutional government, and its respect for the individual freedoms and human rights, we hold as fundamental today."
- B. "In a very real sense, it was then, in 1787, that the Revolution truly began."
- C. "I do not believe that the meaning of the Constitution was forever 'fixed' at the Philadelphia Convention."
- D. "For it was with the writing of our Constitution, setting down the architecture of democratic government, that the noble sentiments and brave rhetoric of 1776 took on substance......"
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Option A highlights the inherent flaws in the original government structure, indicating that it required significant amendments and a civil war to address fundamental issues, including the protection of minority rights. This suggests that, from its inception, the government did not adequately safeguard these rights. Options B, C, and D, while relevant to the historical context, do not specifically address the inadequacies of minority rights protection. B focuses on the ongoing nature of the Revolution, C discusses the evolving interpretation of the Constitution, and D emphasizes the establishment of democratic principles without mentioning the lack of protections for minority rights.
Option A highlights the inherent flaws in the original government structure, indicating that it required significant amendments and a civil war to address fundamental issues, including the protection of minority rights. This suggests that, from its inception, the government did not adequately safeguard these rights. Options B, C, and D, while relevant to the historical context, do not specifically address the inadequacies of minority rights protection. B focuses on the ongoing nature of the Revolution, C discusses the evolving interpretation of the Constitution, and D emphasizes the establishment of democratic principles without mentioning the lack of protections for minority rights.
The United States fought in World War II from 1941 to 1945. Which statement explains the peak annual inflation rate during the 1940s?
- A. Consumer demand increased due to the end of rationing.
- B. Manufacturing decreased because of less demand for weapons.
- C. Government spending increased due to national defense.
- D. Wages decreased because of competition for scarce jobs.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The peak annual inflation rate during the 1940s can be attributed to increased government spending due to national defense efforts. This surge in spending stimulated the economy and raised prices as the demand for goods and services outpaced supply. Option A is incorrect; while consumer demand did rise post-rationing, it was not the primary driver of inflation during the war years. Option B is also wrong, as manufacturing actually increased during the war to meet military needs. Option D misrepresents the labor market; wages generally rose due to high demand for workers, not decreased. Thus, government spending for defense was the key factor in driving inflation during this period.
The peak annual inflation rate during the 1940s can be attributed to increased government spending due to national defense efforts. This surge in spending stimulated the economy and raised prices as the demand for goods and services outpaced supply. Option A is incorrect; while consumer demand did rise post-rationing, it was not the primary driver of inflation during the war years. Option B is also wrong, as manufacturing actually increased during the war to meet military needs. Option D misrepresents the labor market; wages generally rose due to high demand for workers, not decreased. Thus, government spending for defense was the key factor in driving inflation during this period.
According to this information, which philosopher would most likely support the presidential power to appoint federal judges with the consent of the U.S. Senate?
- A. Thomas Hobbes
- B. Baron de Montesquieu
- C. Jean-Jacques Rousseau
- D. John Locke
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Baron de Montesquieu advocated for the separation of powers within government, emphasizing the need for checks and balances to prevent tyranny. His support for a collaborative process in appointing judges aligns with the presidential power requiring Senate consent, ensuring that no single branch holds excessive authority. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, favored a strong central authority and would likely support concentrated power without the need for Senate approval. Jean-Jacques Rousseau emphasized the general will and popular sovereignty, which does not directly address the judicial appointment process. John Locke valued consent and governance but did not specifically advocate for the Senate's role in judicial appointments.
Baron de Montesquieu advocated for the separation of powers within government, emphasizing the need for checks and balances to prevent tyranny. His support for a collaborative process in appointing judges aligns with the presidential power requiring Senate consent, ensuring that no single branch holds excessive authority. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, favored a strong central authority and would likely support concentrated power without the need for Senate approval. Jean-Jacques Rousseau emphasized the general will and popular sovereignty, which does not directly address the judicial appointment process. John Locke valued consent and governance but did not specifically advocate for the Senate's role in judicial appointments.
Which statement from Common Sense provides evidence that the author Thomas Paine supported American independence?
- A. "Absolute governments have this advantage with them, that they are simple..."
- B. "I challenge the warmest advocate for reconciliation, to [show], a single advantage that this continent can reap, by being connected with Great Britain."
- C. "The prejudice of Englishmen, in [favor] of their own government arises as much or more from national pride than reason."
- D. "Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil."
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Option B provides clear evidence of Thomas Paine's support for American independence by challenging the benefits of remaining connected to Great Britain. By asking advocates for reconciliation to demonstrate any advantages, Paine emphasizes the futility of such ties and advocates for autonomy. Option A discusses the simplicity of absolute governments, which does not directly address the question of American independence. Option C critiques English national pride but lacks a direct link to the argument for independence. Option D presents a philosophical view on government but does not specifically advocate for breaking away from British rule.
Option B provides clear evidence of Thomas Paine's support for American independence by challenging the benefits of remaining connected to Great Britain. By asking advocates for reconciliation to demonstrate any advantages, Paine emphasizes the futility of such ties and advocates for autonomy. Option A discusses the simplicity of absolute governments, which does not directly address the question of American independence. Option C critiques English national pride but lacks a direct link to the argument for independence. Option D presents a philosophical view on government but does not specifically advocate for breaking away from British rule.