War Powers in the U.S. Constitution
The framers of the U.S. Constitution divided war powers between Congress and the president. Congress has the power to declare war and to create and fund the military. The president, as commander in chief, has the power to command and control U.S. military forces.
In 1950, President Harry Truman deployed U.S. troops in South Korea as part of a United Nations military force. President Truman referred to the Korean War as a "police action" meant to uphold the rule of law. He never asked Congress for a declaration of war and one was never delivered. Later, as a result of the Vietnam War, Congress passed legislation requiring the president to withdraw troops from combat within 60 days if Congress has not declared war or approved the use of force.
Nevertheless, while Congress and the president continue to argue over war powers, the division of these powers in the U.S. Constitution remains unchanged.
Which statement provides the main idea of the passage?
- A. The founders understood the importance of dividing war powers in the U.S. Constitution.
- B. President Truman used presidential war powers to send troops to South Korea.
- C. Congress restricted presidential war powers as a result of the Vietnam War.
- D. A conflict over presidential war powers exists in the U.S. government.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Option D effectively captures the overarching theme of the passage by highlighting the ongoing conflict regarding presidential war powers within the U.S. government. This statement reflects the central issue discussed throughout the text. Option A, while relevant, focuses solely on the founders' intentions rather than the current implications of war powers. Option B is too specific, addressing a single historical instance rather than the broader concept of power dynamics. Option C, although it mentions a relevant event, limits the discussion to the Vietnam War and does not encompass the ongoing nature of the conflict over these powers.
Option D effectively captures the overarching theme of the passage by highlighting the ongoing conflict regarding presidential war powers within the U.S. government. This statement reflects the central issue discussed throughout the text. Option A, while relevant, focuses solely on the founders' intentions rather than the current implications of war powers. Option B is too specific, addressing a single historical instance rather than the broader concept of power dynamics. Option C, although it mentions a relevant event, limits the discussion to the Vietnam War and does not encompass the ongoing nature of the conflict over these powers.
Other Related Questions
How does the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling differ from Justice Murphy's dissent?
- A. Only Justice Murphy's dissent acknowledged the dangers to the United States of having citizens from foreign lands.
- B. Only the Court's ruling acknowledged that the actions of fearful U.S. authorities can endanger the civil rights of citizens.
- C. Only the Court's ruling contended that Korematsu was ordered held in an internment camp because he was disloyal to the United States during time of war.
- D. Only Justice Murphy's dissent contended that U.S. internment camps were a clear-cut example of racial prejudice.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Justice Murphy's dissent emphasized that the internment camps represented blatant racial prejudice, highlighting the unjust targeting of Japanese Americans based solely on their ethnicity. This perspective contrasts sharply with the majority opinion, which focused on national security concerns without addressing the racial implications. Option A is incorrect as both perspectives recognize the potential dangers of foreign nationals, albeit in different contexts. Option B misrepresents the majority's stance, which did not explicitly acknowledge civil rights violations. Option C inaccurately simplifies the Court's ruling, which did not solely attribute internment to disloyalty.
Justice Murphy's dissent emphasized that the internment camps represented blatant racial prejudice, highlighting the unjust targeting of Japanese Americans based solely on their ethnicity. This perspective contrasts sharply with the majority opinion, which focused on national security concerns without addressing the racial implications. Option A is incorrect as both perspectives recognize the potential dangers of foreign nationals, albeit in different contexts. Option B misrepresents the majority's stance, which did not explicitly acknowledge civil rights violations. Option C inaccurately simplifies the Court's ruling, which did not solely attribute internment to disloyalty.
How did the position expressed by President Johnson differ from the position expressed by Senator Russell?
- A. Only Senator Russell said that state governments were sufficiently protecting the rights of citizens.
- B. Only Senator Russell supported the federal government's intervention.
- C. Only President Johnson supported the state governments' rights to manage their own affairs.
- D. Only President Johnson believed that the federal government was authorized to intervene.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
President Johnson emphasized the need for federal intervention to protect citizens' rights, believing that state governments were often inadequate. In contrast, Senator Russell argued that state governments were effectively safeguarding those rights, reflecting a stance of local governance. Option B is incorrect because Senator Russell did not support federal intervention. Option C misrepresents Johnson’s position; he favored federal oversight rather than state autonomy. Option D inaccurately attributes the belief in federal authority solely to Johnson, as Russell did not share this view. Thus, the distinction lies in Russell's confidence in state governments versus Johnson's call for federal action.
President Johnson emphasized the need for federal intervention to protect citizens' rights, believing that state governments were often inadequate. In contrast, Senator Russell argued that state governments were effectively safeguarding those rights, reflecting a stance of local governance. Option B is incorrect because Senator Russell did not support federal intervention. Option C misrepresents Johnson’s position; he favored federal oversight rather than state autonomy. Option D inaccurately attributes the belief in federal authority solely to Johnson, as Russell did not share this view. Thus, the distinction lies in Russell's confidence in state governments versus Johnson's call for federal action.
Which quotation from the excerpt reveals the author's bias about the relationship between the rule of the majority and the rights of the minority?
- A. "The wishes of the smaller group will override the wishes of the larger group and this will create resentment."
- B. "Requiring a unanimous vote or more than a majority vote is meant to provide a safeguard against oppression."
- C. "In these circumstances, expect constant scheming, trickery, and tiresome delays, resulting in disgraceful deals that violate the public good."
- D. "In times of national emergency, the goodness, badness, weakness, and strength of the government is supremely important."
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Option C highlights the author's bias by suggesting that the majority's decisions can lead to unethical behavior that undermines public welfare. This reveals a concern for minority rights, indicating that the author believes majority rule may result in negative consequences for those not in power. Option A misrepresents the author's view, as it suggests that the smaller group's wishes will always be overridden, which does not directly reflect bias against majority rule. Option B focuses on safeguards against oppression, which does not convey bias but rather a protective measure. Option D addresses the government's performance during emergencies but fails to connect to the relationship between majority rule and minority rights, missing the core issue of bias.
Option C highlights the author's bias by suggesting that the majority's decisions can lead to unethical behavior that undermines public welfare. This reveals a concern for minority rights, indicating that the author believes majority rule may result in negative consequences for those not in power. Option A misrepresents the author's view, as it suggests that the smaller group's wishes will always be overridden, which does not directly reflect bias against majority rule. Option B focuses on safeguards against oppression, which does not convey bias but rather a protective measure. Option D addresses the government's performance during emergencies but fails to connect to the relationship between majority rule and minority rights, missing the core issue of bias.
Which prediction is supported by both graphs?
- A. The average wage for farm workers will decrease..
- B. The average cost for agricultural produce will decrease.
- C. The operating cost of running a farm will increase.
- D. The number of people required for producing food will increase.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Option C is supported by both graphs, indicating an upward trend in operational costs due to factors like inflation and increased resource prices. This aligns with economic patterns observed in the agricultural sector. Option A is incorrect as both graphs do not show a decline in farm worker wages; rather, they suggest stability or growth. Option B is misleading; the graphs do not reflect a decrease in agricultural produce costs, which often correlate with rising operational expenses. Option D is also unsupported, as the data does not indicate an increase in labor requirements, but rather highlights efficiency improvements in farming practices.
Option C is supported by both graphs, indicating an upward trend in operational costs due to factors like inflation and increased resource prices. This aligns with economic patterns observed in the agricultural sector. Option A is incorrect as both graphs do not show a decline in farm worker wages; rather, they suggest stability or growth. Option B is misleading; the graphs do not reflect a decrease in agricultural produce costs, which often correlate with rising operational expenses. Option D is also unsupported, as the data does not indicate an increase in labor requirements, but rather highlights efficiency improvements in farming practices.