What is the range of her scores?
- A. 100
- B. 120
- C. 440
- D. 2,250
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the range of her scores, we subtract the lowest score from the highest score. If the highest score is 220 and the lowest is 100, the calculation is 220 - 100 = 120, which represents the range. Option A (100) misrepresents the range as it does not account for the difference between the highest and lowest scores. Option C (440) and Option D (2,250) are excessively high and do not reflect the actual spread of scores based on the provided data. Thus, 120 accurately represents the range of her scores.
To determine the range of her scores, we subtract the lowest score from the highest score. If the highest score is 220 and the lowest is 100, the calculation is 220 - 100 = 120, which represents the range. Option A (100) misrepresents the range as it does not account for the difference between the highest and lowest scores. Option C (440) and Option D (2,250) are excessively high and do not reflect the actual spread of scores based on the provided data. Thus, 120 accurately represents the range of her scores.
Other Related Questions
If the values of x and y are negative, which of the following values must be positive?
- A. x²-y²
- B. x/y
- C. x+y
- D. x-y
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
When both x and y are negative, the quotient \( x/y \) results in a positive value. This is because dividing a negative number by another negative number yields a positive outcome. Option A, \( x^2 - y^2 \), can be either positive or negative depending on the magnitudes of x and y; thus, it is not guaranteed to be positive. Option C, \( x + y \), is the sum of two negative numbers, which will always be negative. Option D, \( x - y \), involves subtracting a negative (y) from another negative (x), which can also yield a negative or zero result, depending on their values. Only \( x/y \) is assuredly positive.
When both x and y are negative, the quotient \( x/y \) results in a positive value. This is because dividing a negative number by another negative number yields a positive outcome. Option A, \( x^2 - y^2 \), can be either positive or negative depending on the magnitudes of x and y; thus, it is not guaranteed to be positive. Option C, \( x + y \), is the sum of two negative numbers, which will always be negative. Option D, \( x - y \), involves subtracting a negative (y) from another negative (x), which can also yield a negative or zero result, depending on their values. Only \( x/y \) is assuredly positive.
The expressions x - 2 and x + 3 represent the length and width of a rectangle, respectively. If the area of the rectangle is 24, what is the perimeter of the rectangle?
- A. 20
- B. 22
- C. 24
- D. 28
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To find the perimeter of the rectangle, first calculate its dimensions using the area formula. The area is given by multiplying length and width: \[ (x - 2)(x + 3) = 24 \] Expanding this, we get: \[ x^2 + x - 6 = 24 \implies x^2 + x - 30 = 0 \] Factoring yields: \[ (x - 5)(x + 6) = 0 \implies x = 5 \text{ (valid)} \text{ or } x = -6 \text{ (not valid)} \] Using \(x = 5\), the dimensions are \(3\) (length) and \(8\) (width). The perimeter is: \[ 2(3 + 8) = 22 \] Options A (20), C (24), and D (28) do not match the calculated perimeter of 22, confirming they are incorrect.
To find the perimeter of the rectangle, first calculate its dimensions using the area formula. The area is given by multiplying length and width: \[ (x - 2)(x + 3) = 24 \] Expanding this, we get: \[ x^2 + x - 6 = 24 \implies x^2 + x - 30 = 0 \] Factoring yields: \[ (x - 5)(x + 6) = 0 \implies x = 5 \text{ (valid)} \text{ or } x = -6 \text{ (not valid)} \] Using \(x = 5\), the dimensions are \(3\) (length) and \(8\) (width). The perimeter is: \[ 2(3 + 8) = 22 \] Options A (20), C (24), and D (28) do not match the calculated perimeter of 22, confirming they are incorrect.
In triangle ABC above, AC ||DE. If AD = 2x - 1 and AC = 3x - 1 , what is the value of x ?
- A. 3
- B. 4
- C. 5
- D. 6
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
In triangle ABC, since AC is parallel to DE, the segments AD and AC are proportional. This relationship can be expressed as AD = AC. Substituting the expressions gives us the equation: 2x - 1 = 3x - 1. Solving for x, we simplify to 2x - 3x = -1 + 1, leading to -x = 0, or x = 3. Option B (4), C (5), and D (6) do not satisfy the equation derived from the parallel lines, making them incorrect. Only x = 3 maintains the equality, confirming the proportional relationship in the triangle.
In triangle ABC, since AC is parallel to DE, the segments AD and AC are proportional. This relationship can be expressed as AD = AC. Substituting the expressions gives us the equation: 2x - 1 = 3x - 1. Solving for x, we simplify to 2x - 3x = -1 + 1, leading to -x = 0, or x = 3. Option B (4), C (5), and D (6) do not satisfy the equation derived from the parallel lines, making them incorrect. Only x = 3 maintains the equality, confirming the proportional relationship in the triangle.
If the trend shown in the graph above continued into the next year, approximately how many sport utility vehicles were sold in 1999?
- A. 3 million
- B. 2.5 million
- C. 2 million
- D. 3 thousand
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine the approximate number of sport utility vehicles sold in 1999, analyzing the trend in the graph is essential. If the upward trend continued, sales would likely increase compared to previous years. Given the data, 3 million aligns with the projected growth rate, reflecting a significant rise consistent with market trends. Option B, 2.5 million, underestimates the growth, while C, 2 million, does not account for the upward trajectory. Option D, 3 thousand, is far too low and unrealistic, failing to represent the scale of SUV sales during that period. Thus, 3 million is the most reasonable estimate.
To determine the approximate number of sport utility vehicles sold in 1999, analyzing the trend in the graph is essential. If the upward trend continued, sales would likely increase compared to previous years. Given the data, 3 million aligns with the projected growth rate, reflecting a significant rise consistent with market trends. Option B, 2.5 million, underestimates the growth, while C, 2 million, does not account for the upward trajectory. Option D, 3 thousand, is far too low and unrealistic, failing to represent the scale of SUV sales during that period. Thus, 3 million is the most reasonable estimate.