Choose the best answer. If necessary, use the paper you were given.
If the trend shown in the graph above continued into the next year, approximately how many sport utility vehicles were sold in 1999?
- A. 3 million
- B. 2.5 million
- C. 2 million
- D. 3 thousand
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine the approximate number of sport utility vehicles sold in 1999, analyzing the trend in the graph is essential. If the upward trend continued, sales would likely increase compared to previous years. Given the data, 3 million aligns with the projected growth rate, reflecting a significant rise consistent with market trends. Option B, 2.5 million, underestimates the growth, while C, 2 million, does not account for the upward trajectory. Option D, 3 thousand, is far too low and unrealistic, failing to represent the scale of SUV sales during that period. Thus, 3 million is the most reasonable estimate.
To determine the approximate number of sport utility vehicles sold in 1999, analyzing the trend in the graph is essential. If the upward trend continued, sales would likely increase compared to previous years. Given the data, 3 million aligns with the projected growth rate, reflecting a significant rise consistent with market trends. Option B, 2.5 million, underestimates the growth, while C, 2 million, does not account for the upward trajectory. Option D, 3 thousand, is far too low and unrealistic, failing to represent the scale of SUV sales during that period. Thus, 3 million is the most reasonable estimate.
Other Related Questions
In the figure above, what is the average (arithmetic mean) of w, x, y, and z?
- A. 90
- B. 100
- C. 120
- D. It cannot be determined from the information given.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the average of w, x, y, and z, all values must be known. Option D is valid since the problem does not provide specific values or relationships between these variables, making it impossible to calculate their average. Option A (90), Option B (100), and Option C (120) suggest definitive averages, but without concrete data on w, x, y, and z, these answers cannot be substantiated. Each of these options assumes values that may not exist or be accurate, highlighting the necessity of complete information for such calculations.
To find the average of w, x, y, and z, all values must be known. Option D is valid since the problem does not provide specific values or relationships between these variables, making it impossible to calculate their average. Option A (90), Option B (100), and Option C (120) suggest definitive averages, but without concrete data on w, x, y, and z, these answers cannot be substantiated. Each of these options assumes values that may not exist or be accurate, highlighting the necessity of complete information for such calculations.
If a number from set M is selected at random, what is the probability that the number selected will be a factor of 12?
- A. 0.1
- B. 0.2
- C. 0.4
- D. 0.5
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the probability that a randomly selected number from set M is a factor of 12, we first identify the factors of 12, which are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12. If set M consists of 6 numbers (1 through 6), then 4 of these (1, 2, 3, and 4) are factors of 12. Thus, the probability is 4 out of 6, simplifying to 0.4. Option A (0.1) underestimates the number of factors. Option B (0.2) suggests only 2 factors, which is incorrect. Option D (0.5) implies 3 factors, also inaccurate. Therefore, 0.4 accurately represents the proportion of factors of 12 in the set.
To determine the probability that a randomly selected number from set M is a factor of 12, we first identify the factors of 12, which are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12. If set M consists of 6 numbers (1 through 6), then 4 of these (1, 2, 3, and 4) are factors of 12. Thus, the probability is 4 out of 6, simplifying to 0.4. Option A (0.1) underestimates the number of factors. Option B (0.2) suggests only 2 factors, which is incorrect. Option D (0.5) implies 3 factors, also inaccurate. Therefore, 0.4 accurately represents the proportion of factors of 12 in the set.
If the combined amount of donations collected by Kevin, Fran, and Brooke exceeded the amount Lamar collected by $250, what was the total amount of donations collected by all five club members?
- A. $500
- B. $1,200
- C. $2,500
- D. $3,200
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the total amount of donations collected by all five club members, we start with the information that the combined donations of Kevin, Fran, and Brooke exceeded Lamar's by $250. If we denote Lamar's donations as \( L \), then the amount collected by Kevin, Fran, and Brooke is \( L + 250 \). Thus, the total donations from all five members can be expressed as \( L + (L + 250) = 2L + 250 \). To find a plausible total, we consider the options. - A: $500 is too low, as it doesn't allow for both \( L \) and the excess amount. - B: $1,200 also falls short since it would imply \( L \) is negative. - D: $3,200 would require \( L \) to be too high, exceeding reasonable donation limits. C: $2,500 fits perfectly, allowing \( L \) to be $1,125, which is a feasible figure. Therefore, the total amount is logically $2,500.
To determine the total amount of donations collected by all five club members, we start with the information that the combined donations of Kevin, Fran, and Brooke exceeded Lamar's by $250. If we denote Lamar's donations as \( L \), then the amount collected by Kevin, Fran, and Brooke is \( L + 250 \). Thus, the total donations from all five members can be expressed as \( L + (L + 250) = 2L + 250 \). To find a plausible total, we consider the options. - A: $500 is too low, as it doesn't allow for both \( L \) and the excess amount. - B: $1,200 also falls short since it would imply \( L \) is negative. - D: $3,200 would require \( L \) to be too high, exceeding reasonable donation limits. C: $2,500 fits perfectly, allowing \( L \) to be $1,125, which is a feasible figure. Therefore, the total amount is logically $2,500.
A playground at a mall is in the shape of a rectangle, and there is a 144 foot long fence around it. If the rectangle is 6 feet longer than it is wide, what is the width, in feet, of the rectangle?
- A. 33
- B. 39
- C. 69
- D. 75
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To find the width of the rectangle, let the width be represented as \( w \). The length, being 6 feet longer, can be expressed as \( w + 6 \). The perimeter of a rectangle is given by the formula \( P = 2(l + w) \). Here, the perimeter is 144 feet, leading to the equation \( 2(w + (w + 6)) = 144 \). Simplifying this gives \( 2(2w + 6) = 144 \), which reduces to \( 4w + 12 = 144 \), and further simplifies to \( 4w = 132 \), resulting in \( w = 33 \). Option B (39) is incorrect as it gives a perimeter of 156 feet. Option C (69) would lead to an impossible perimeter of 150 feet. Option D (75) results in a perimeter of 162 feet, which exceeds the given value. Thus, only option A satisfies all conditions, confirming the width as 33 feet.
To find the width of the rectangle, let the width be represented as \( w \). The length, being 6 feet longer, can be expressed as \( w + 6 \). The perimeter of a rectangle is given by the formula \( P = 2(l + w) \). Here, the perimeter is 144 feet, leading to the equation \( 2(w + (w + 6)) = 144 \). Simplifying this gives \( 2(2w + 6) = 144 \), which reduces to \( 4w + 12 = 144 \), and further simplifies to \( 4w = 132 \), resulting in \( w = 33 \). Option B (39) is incorrect as it gives a perimeter of 156 feet. Option C (69) would lead to an impossible perimeter of 150 feet. Option D (75) results in a perimeter of 162 feet, which exceeds the given value. Thus, only option A satisfies all conditions, confirming the width as 33 feet.