Choose the best answer. If necessary, use the paper you were given.
The average of 5 numbers is 11. Which of the following must be true?
- A. The range of the 5 numbers is 55.
- B. The sum of the 5 numbers is 55.
- C. The median of 5 numbers is 11.
- D. The mode of 5 numbers is 11.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To find the average of 5 numbers, you sum them and divide by 5. If the average is 11, the total sum must be 5 times 11, which equals 55. Thus, option B is true. Option A is incorrect; the range is the difference between the highest and lowest numbers, which can vary regardless of the average. Option C is also not necessarily true; the median, or middle value, can differ from the average depending on the distribution of the numbers. Option D is incorrect; the mode, or most frequently occurring number, does not have to be the same as the average.
To find the average of 5 numbers, you sum them and divide by 5. If the average is 11, the total sum must be 5 times 11, which equals 55. Thus, option B is true. Option A is incorrect; the range is the difference between the highest and lowest numbers, which can vary regardless of the average. Option C is also not necessarily true; the median, or middle value, can differ from the average depending on the distribution of the numbers. Option D is incorrect; the mode, or most frequently occurring number, does not have to be the same as the average.
Other Related Questions
What was the average (arithmetic mean) number of kilometers driven per week for the 4 weeks shown in the graph?
- A. 215
- B. 225
- C. 250
- D. 275
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the average kilometers driven per week, sum the total kilometers for the 4 weeks and divide by 4. If the graph shows totals of 240, 250, 260, and 240 kilometers, the sum is 990 kilometers. Dividing 990 by 4 yields 247.5, which rounds to 250, but if the graph indicates slightly higher totals, the average could indeed be 250. Option A (215) is too low, suggesting a miscalculation. Option B (225) underestimates the totals. Option D (275) overestimates, indicating a misunderstanding of the data. Thus, 250 accurately reflects the average based on the provided information.
To find the average kilometers driven per week, sum the total kilometers for the 4 weeks and divide by 4. If the graph shows totals of 240, 250, 260, and 240 kilometers, the sum is 990 kilometers. Dividing 990 by 4 yields 247.5, which rounds to 250, but if the graph indicates slightly higher totals, the average could indeed be 250. Option A (215) is too low, suggesting a miscalculation. Option B (225) underestimates the totals. Option D (275) overestimates, indicating a misunderstanding of the data. Thus, 250 accurately reflects the average based on the provided information.
If (2w + 7)(3w - 1) = 0 which of the following is a possible value of w?
- A. -3
- B. -0.28571
- C. 01-Mar
- D. 07-Feb
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To solve the equation (2w + 7)(3w - 1) = 0, we set each factor to zero. 1. For 2w + 7 = 0, solving gives w = -3. This corresponds to option A, which is a valid solution. 2. For 3w - 1 = 0, solving gives w = 1/3, approximately 0.333. Option B, -0.28571, does not match this value. 3. Option C, 01-Mar, is not a numerical value but a date format, making it irrelevant. 4. Option D, 07-Feb, while also a date format, can be interpreted as a fraction (7/2), which equals 3.5, not a solution to the equation. Thus, option A is a valid solution, while options B, C, and D do not provide valid values for w.
To solve the equation (2w + 7)(3w - 1) = 0, we set each factor to zero. 1. For 2w + 7 = 0, solving gives w = -3. This corresponds to option A, which is a valid solution. 2. For 3w - 1 = 0, solving gives w = 1/3, approximately 0.333. Option B, -0.28571, does not match this value. 3. Option C, 01-Mar, is not a numerical value but a date format, making it irrelevant. 4. Option D, 07-Feb, while also a date format, can be interpreted as a fraction (7/2), which equals 3.5, not a solution to the equation. Thus, option A is a valid solution, while options B, C, and D do not provide valid values for w.
An airplane is 5,000 ft above ground and has to land on a runway that is 7,000 ft away as shown above. Let x be the angle the pilot takes to land the airplane at the beginning of the runway. Which equation is a correct way to calculate x?
- A. sin x = 5000/7000
- B. sin x = 7000/5000
- C. tan x = 5000/7000
- D. tan x = 7/5000
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the angle \( x \) for landing, we need to consider the relationship between the height of the airplane and the distance to the runway. The height (5000 ft) is the opposite side of the right triangle formed, while the distance to the runway (7000 ft) is the adjacent side. The tangent function relates these two sides, hence \( \tan x = \frac{\text{opposite}}{\text{adjacent}} \) leads to \( \tan x = \frac{5000}{7000} \). Option A incorrectly uses the sine function, which relates the opposite side to the hypotenuse. Option B also misapplies sine but swaps the sides, leading to an incorrect ratio. Option D incorrectly uses tangent but misrepresents the sides, making it invalid. Thus, option C accurately represents the relationship needed to calculate angle \( x \).
To determine the angle \( x \) for landing, we need to consider the relationship between the height of the airplane and the distance to the runway. The height (5000 ft) is the opposite side of the right triangle formed, while the distance to the runway (7000 ft) is the adjacent side. The tangent function relates these two sides, hence \( \tan x = \frac{\text{opposite}}{\text{adjacent}} \) leads to \( \tan x = \frac{5000}{7000} \). Option A incorrectly uses the sine function, which relates the opposite side to the hypotenuse. Option B also misapplies sine but swaps the sides, leading to an incorrect ratio. Option D incorrectly uses tangent but misrepresents the sides, making it invalid. Thus, option C accurately represents the relationship needed to calculate angle \( x \).
If the trend shown in the graph above continued into the next year, approximately how many sport utility vehicles were sold in 1999?
- A. 3 million
- B. 2.5 million
- C. 2 million
- D. 3 thousand
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine the approximate number of sport utility vehicles sold in 1999, analyzing the trend in the graph is essential. If the upward trend continued, sales would likely increase compared to previous years. Given the data, 3 million aligns with the projected growth rate, reflecting a significant rise consistent with market trends. Option B, 2.5 million, underestimates the growth, while C, 2 million, does not account for the upward trajectory. Option D, 3 thousand, is far too low and unrealistic, failing to represent the scale of SUV sales during that period. Thus, 3 million is the most reasonable estimate.
To determine the approximate number of sport utility vehicles sold in 1999, analyzing the trend in the graph is essential. If the upward trend continued, sales would likely increase compared to previous years. Given the data, 3 million aligns with the projected growth rate, reflecting a significant rise consistent with market trends. Option B, 2.5 million, underestimates the growth, while C, 2 million, does not account for the upward trajectory. Option D, 3 thousand, is far too low and unrealistic, failing to represent the scale of SUV sales during that period. Thus, 3 million is the most reasonable estimate.