Choose the best answer. If necessary, use the paper you were given.
The expressions x - 2 and x + 3 represent the length and width of a rectangle, respectively. If the area of the rectangle is 24, what is the perimeter of the rectangle?
- A. 20
- B. 22
- C. 24
- D. 28
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To find the perimeter of the rectangle, first calculate its dimensions using the area formula. The area is given by multiplying length and width: \[ (x - 2)(x + 3) = 24 \] Expanding this, we get: \[ x^2 + x - 6 = 24 \implies x^2 + x - 30 = 0 \] Factoring yields: \[ (x - 5)(x + 6) = 0 \implies x = 5 \text{ (valid)} \text{ or } x = -6 \text{ (not valid)} \] Using \(x = 5\), the dimensions are \(3\) (length) and \(8\) (width). The perimeter is: \[ 2(3 + 8) = 22 \] Options A (20), C (24), and D (28) do not match the calculated perimeter of 22, confirming they are incorrect.
To find the perimeter of the rectangle, first calculate its dimensions using the area formula. The area is given by multiplying length and width: \[ (x - 2)(x + 3) = 24 \] Expanding this, we get: \[ x^2 + x - 6 = 24 \implies x^2 + x - 30 = 0 \] Factoring yields: \[ (x - 5)(x + 6) = 0 \implies x = 5 \text{ (valid)} \text{ or } x = -6 \text{ (not valid)} \] Using \(x = 5\), the dimensions are \(3\) (length) and \(8\) (width). The perimeter is: \[ 2(3 + 8) = 22 \] Options A (20), C (24), and D (28) do not match the calculated perimeter of 22, confirming they are incorrect.
Other Related Questions
If a number from set M is selected at random, what is the probability that the number selected will be a factor of 12?
- A. 0.1
- B. 0.2
- C. 0.4
- D. 0.5
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the probability that a randomly selected number from set M is a factor of 12, we first identify the factors of 12, which are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12. If set M consists of 6 numbers (1 through 6), then 4 of these (1, 2, 3, and 4) are factors of 12. Thus, the probability is 4 out of 6, simplifying to 0.4. Option A (0.1) underestimates the number of factors. Option B (0.2) suggests only 2 factors, which is incorrect. Option D (0.5) implies 3 factors, also inaccurate. Therefore, 0.4 accurately represents the proportion of factors of 12 in the set.
To determine the probability that a randomly selected number from set M is a factor of 12, we first identify the factors of 12, which are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12. If set M consists of 6 numbers (1 through 6), then 4 of these (1, 2, 3, and 4) are factors of 12. Thus, the probability is 4 out of 6, simplifying to 0.4. Option A (0.1) underestimates the number of factors. Option B (0.2) suggests only 2 factors, which is incorrect. Option D (0.5) implies 3 factors, also inaccurate. Therefore, 0.4 accurately represents the proportion of factors of 12 in the set.
In triangle ABC above, AC ||DE. If AD = 2x - 1 and AC = 3x - 1 , what is the value of x ?
- A. 3
- B. 4
- C. 5
- D. 6
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
In triangle ABC, since AC is parallel to DE, the segments AD and AC are proportional. This relationship can be expressed as AD = AC. Substituting the expressions gives us the equation: 2x - 1 = 3x - 1. Solving for x, we simplify to 2x - 3x = -1 + 1, leading to -x = 0, or x = 3. Option B (4), C (5), and D (6) do not satisfy the equation derived from the parallel lines, making them incorrect. Only x = 3 maintains the equality, confirming the proportional relationship in the triangle.
In triangle ABC, since AC is parallel to DE, the segments AD and AC are proportional. This relationship can be expressed as AD = AC. Substituting the expressions gives us the equation: 2x - 1 = 3x - 1. Solving for x, we simplify to 2x - 3x = -1 + 1, leading to -x = 0, or x = 3. Option B (4), C (5), and D (6) do not satisfy the equation derived from the parallel lines, making them incorrect. Only x = 3 maintains the equality, confirming the proportional relationship in the triangle.
If the trend shown in the graph above continued into the next year, approximately how many sport utility vehicles were sold in 1999?
- A. 3 million
- B. 2.5 million
- C. 2 million
- D. 3 thousand
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine the approximate number of sport utility vehicles sold in 1999, analyzing the trend in the graph is essential. If the upward trend continued, sales would likely increase compared to previous years. Given the data, 3 million aligns with the projected growth rate, reflecting a significant rise consistent with market trends. Option B, 2.5 million, underestimates the growth, while C, 2 million, does not account for the upward trajectory. Option D, 3 thousand, is far too low and unrealistic, failing to represent the scale of SUV sales during that period. Thus, 3 million is the most reasonable estimate.
To determine the approximate number of sport utility vehicles sold in 1999, analyzing the trend in the graph is essential. If the upward trend continued, sales would likely increase compared to previous years. Given the data, 3 million aligns with the projected growth rate, reflecting a significant rise consistent with market trends. Option B, 2.5 million, underestimates the growth, while C, 2 million, does not account for the upward trajectory. Option D, 3 thousand, is far too low and unrealistic, failing to represent the scale of SUV sales during that period. Thus, 3 million is the most reasonable estimate.
If the combined amount of donations collected by Kevin, Fran, and Brooke exceeded the amount Lamar collected by $250, what was the total amount of donations collected by all five club members?
- A. $500
- B. $1,200
- C. $2,500
- D. $3,200
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the total amount of donations collected by all five club members, we start with the information that the combined donations of Kevin, Fran, and Brooke exceeded Lamar's by $250. If we denote Lamar's donations as \( L \), then the amount collected by Kevin, Fran, and Brooke is \( L + 250 \). Thus, the total donations from all five members can be expressed as \( L + (L + 250) = 2L + 250 \). To find a plausible total, we consider the options. - A: $500 is too low, as it doesn't allow for both \( L \) and the excess amount. - B: $1,200 also falls short since it would imply \( L \) is negative. - D: $3,200 would require \( L \) to be too high, exceeding reasonable donation limits. C: $2,500 fits perfectly, allowing \( L \) to be $1,125, which is a feasible figure. Therefore, the total amount is logically $2,500.
To determine the total amount of donations collected by all five club members, we start with the information that the combined donations of Kevin, Fran, and Brooke exceeded Lamar's by $250. If we denote Lamar's donations as \( L \), then the amount collected by Kevin, Fran, and Brooke is \( L + 250 \). Thus, the total donations from all five members can be expressed as \( L + (L + 250) = 2L + 250 \). To find a plausible total, we consider the options. - A: $500 is too low, as it doesn't allow for both \( L \) and the excess amount. - B: $1,200 also falls short since it would imply \( L \) is negative. - D: $3,200 would require \( L \) to be too high, exceeding reasonable donation limits. C: $2,500 fits perfectly, allowing \( L \) to be $1,125, which is a feasible figure. Therefore, the total amount is logically $2,500.