tsia2 math practice test

A placement test used in Texas to assess a student's readiness for college-level coursework in math, reading, and writing.

Choose the best answer. If necessary, use the paper you were given.
A shirt is on sale for 15 percent off the original price of x dollars. If a customer has a coupon for 5 dollars off the sale price, which of the following represents the price, in dollars, the customer will pay, excluding tax, for the shirt?
  • A. 0.15x-5
  • B. 0.85x -5
  • C. 0.85(x-5)
  • D. 5-0.85x
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B

To determine the price a customer pays after applying both discounts, start with the original price, x. A 15% discount reduces the price to 85% of the original, calculated as 0.85x. After this, the customer applies a $5 coupon, leading to the final price of 0.85x - 5. Option A (0.15x - 5) incorrectly calculates the discount as a direct subtraction from the original price, misrepresenting the order of operations. Option C (0.85(x - 5)) mistakenly applies the coupon before calculating the discount, which is not the correct sequence. Option D (5 - 0.85x) suggests a negative price, which is nonsensical in this context.

Other Related Questions

Which of the following is a factor of u²+uv-2v²?
  • A. (u-v)
  • B. (2u-v)
  • C. (u-2v)
  • D. (u+v)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C

To determine the factors of \( u^2 + uv - 2v^2 \), we can factor the expression. Option C, \( (u - 2v) \), is a valid factor. When we perform polynomial long division or synthetic division using \( (u - 2v) \), we find that it divides evenly, confirming it as a factor. Option A, \( (u - v) \), does not satisfy the factorization, as substituting \( v \) does not yield a zero remainder. Option B, \( (2u - v) \), also fails to factor the expression correctly, leading to a non-zero remainder upon division. Option D, \( (u + v) \), similarly does not yield a zero remainder, confirming it is not a factor. Thus, only \( (u - 2v) \) is a valid factor of the expression.
The expressions x - 2 and x + 3 represent the length and width of a rectangle, respectively. If the area of the rectangle is 24, what is the perimeter of the rectangle?
  • A. 20
  • B. 22
  • C. 24
  • D. 28
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B

To find the perimeter of the rectangle, first calculate its dimensions using the area formula. The area is given by multiplying length and width: \[ (x - 2)(x + 3) = 24 \] Expanding this, we get: \[ x^2 + x - 6 = 24 \implies x^2 + x - 30 = 0 \] Factoring yields: \[ (x - 5)(x + 6) = 0 \implies x = 5 \text{ (valid)} \text{ or } x = -6 \text{ (not valid)} \] Using \(x = 5\), the dimensions are \(3\) (length) and \(8\) (width). The perimeter is: \[ 2(3 + 8) = 22 \] Options A (20), C (24), and D (28) do not match the calculated perimeter of 22, confirming they are incorrect.
Which of the following is NOT a factor of x^4 +x^3?
  • A. X
  • B. X + 1
  • C. X^3
  • D. X^4
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D

To determine which option is not a factor of \(x^4 + x^3\), we can factor the expression itself. Factoring out the greatest common factor, we have \(x^3(x + 1)\). - **Option A: X** is a factor since \(x\) is part of \(x^3\). - **Option B: X + 1** is a factor as it is the remaining term after factoring \(x^3\). - **Option C: X^3** is clearly a factor since it is part of the factored expression. **Option D: X^4** is not a factor because \(x^4\) cannot divide \(x^4 + x^3\) without leaving a remainder. Thus, it does not fit into the factorization.
If the trend shown in the graph above continued into the next year, approximately how many sport utility vehicles were sold in 1999?
Question image
  • A. 3 million
  • B. 2.5 million
  • C. 2 million
  • D. 3 thousand
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A

To determine the approximate number of sport utility vehicles sold in 1999, analyzing the trend in the graph is essential. If the upward trend continued, sales would likely increase compared to previous years. Given the data, 3 million aligns with the projected growth rate, reflecting a significant rise consistent with market trends. Option B, 2.5 million, underestimates the growth, while C, 2 million, does not account for the upward trajectory. Option D, 3 thousand, is far too low and unrealistic, failing to represent the scale of SUV sales during that period. Thus, 3 million is the most reasonable estimate.