Square side 5(1/2)cm. Area?
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: 121/4
To find the area of a square, the formula used is side length squared. Here, the side length is 5(1/2) cm, which converts to 5.5 cm or 11/2 cm. Squaring this value gives (11/2)² = 121/4 cm², confirming the correct area. The other options are incorrect because: - If calculated as 5 cm, the area would be 25 cm², neglecting the fractional part. - If 5.5 cm is incorrectly squared as 30.25 cm², it miscalculates the area. - Any other value derived from misinterpretation of the side length will not yield the correct area.
To find the area of a square, the formula used is side length squared. Here, the side length is 5(1/2) cm, which converts to 5.5 cm or 11/2 cm. Squaring this value gives (11/2)² = 121/4 cm², confirming the correct area. The other options are incorrect because: - If calculated as 5 cm, the area would be 25 cm², neglecting the fractional part. - If 5.5 cm is incorrectly squared as 30.25 cm², it miscalculates the area. - Any other value derived from misinterpretation of the side length will not yield the correct area.
Other Related Questions
Joe’s age 4 more than 3x Amy’s. Equation?
- A. A=J/3+4
- B. A=3J+4
- C. J=3A+4
- D. J=3(A+4)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the equation representing Joe's age in relation to Amy's, we start with the statement: Joe's age (J) is 4 more than 3 times Amy's age (A). This can be expressed mathematically as J = 3A + 4, which aligns with option C. Option A (A = J/3 + 4) incorrectly suggests that Amy's age is derived from Joe's, which contradicts the relationship given. Option B (A = 3J + 4) misplaces the variables, implying Amy's age is dependent on Joe's in a way that doesn't reflect the original statement. Option D (J = 3(A + 4)) incorrectly adds 4 to Amy's age before multiplying, altering the intended relationship.
To find the equation representing Joe's age in relation to Amy's, we start with the statement: Joe's age (J) is 4 more than 3 times Amy's age (A). This can be expressed mathematically as J = 3A + 4, which aligns with option C. Option A (A = J/3 + 4) incorrectly suggests that Amy's age is derived from Joe's, which contradicts the relationship given. Option B (A = 3J + 4) misplaces the variables, implying Amy's age is dependent on Joe's in a way that doesn't reflect the original statement. Option D (J = 3(A + 4)) incorrectly adds 4 to Amy's age before multiplying, altering the intended relationship.
Eraser 20g in mg?
- A. 1.002
- B. 0.02
- C. 2,000
- D. 20
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To convert grams to milligrams, one must remember that 1 gram equals 1,000 milligrams. Therefore, 20 grams can be calculated as follows: 20 g x 1,000 mg/g = 20,000 mg. Option A (1.002 mg) is incorrect as it significantly underestimates the conversion. Option B (0.02 mg) is also wrong; it suggests a conversion error by not accounting for the unit scale correctly. Option C (2,000 mg) miscalculates the conversion by a factor of ten. Option D correctly represents 20 grams as 20,000 milligrams, aligning with the proper conversion calculation.
To convert grams to milligrams, one must remember that 1 gram equals 1,000 milligrams. Therefore, 20 grams can be calculated as follows: 20 g x 1,000 mg/g = 20,000 mg. Option A (1.002 mg) is incorrect as it significantly underestimates the conversion. Option B (0.02 mg) is also wrong; it suggests a conversion error by not accounting for the unit scale correctly. Option C (2,000 mg) miscalculates the conversion by a factor of ten. Option D correctly represents 20 grams as 20,000 milligrams, aligning with the proper conversion calculation.
P=2(L+W), P=48, W=L-4. Width?
- A. 10
- B. 12
- C. 20
- D. 24
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To find the width (W), start with the given perimeter formula \( P = 2(L + W) \). Substituting \( P = 48 \) gives \( 48 = 2(L + W) \), which simplifies to \( L + W = 24 \). Given \( W = L - 4 \), substitute this into the equation: \( L + (L - 4) = 24 \). This simplifies to \( 2L - 4 = 24 \), leading to \( 2L = 28 \) and \( L = 14 \). Thus, \( W = 14 - 4 = 10 \). Option B (12) does not satisfy the perimeter equation. Option C (20) and Option D (24) also do not fit the derived equations, confirming that W must be 10.
To find the width (W), start with the given perimeter formula \( P = 2(L + W) \). Substituting \( P = 48 \) gives \( 48 = 2(L + W) \), which simplifies to \( L + W = 24 \). Given \( W = L - 4 \), substitute this into the equation: \( L + (L - 4) = 24 \). This simplifies to \( 2L - 4 = 24 \), leading to \( 2L = 28 \) and \( L = 14 \). Thus, \( W = 14 - 4 = 10 \). Option B (12) does not satisfy the perimeter equation. Option C (20) and Option D (24) also do not fit the derived equations, confirming that W must be 10.
p=5n, questions n, points p. True?
- A. Points dependent
- B. Questions dependent
- C. 5 points dependent
- D. 1/5 question dependent
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
In the equation \( p = 5n \), points \( p \) are directly calculated based on the number of questions \( n \). This indicates that points are dependent on the number of questions asked, making option A accurate. Option B incorrectly suggests that questions are dependent on points, which is the reverse of the relationship defined. Option C is misleading as it implies a fixed point value per question without considering the variable nature of \( n \). Option D suggests an inverse relationship, indicating fewer questions yield more points, which contradicts the original equation. Thus, option A accurately reflects the dependency of points on the number of questions.
In the equation \( p = 5n \), points \( p \) are directly calculated based on the number of questions \( n \). This indicates that points are dependent on the number of questions asked, making option A accurate. Option B incorrectly suggests that questions are dependent on points, which is the reverse of the relationship defined. Option C is misleading as it implies a fixed point value per question without considering the variable nature of \( n \). Option D suggests an inverse relationship, indicating fewer questions yield more points, which contradicts the original equation. Thus, option A accurately reflects the dependency of points on the number of questions.