178-degree angle?
- A. Acute
- B. Obtuse
- C. Right
- D. Straight
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
An angle measuring 178 degrees is classified as obtuse, as it is greater than 90 degrees but less than 180 degrees. Option A, acute, refers to angles less than 90 degrees, which does not apply here. Option C, right, denotes a 90-degree angle, clearly not fitting for 178 degrees. Option D, straight, describes a 180-degree angle, which is also not applicable since 178 degrees is slightly less than that. Thus, the only suitable classification for a 178-degree angle is obtuse.
An angle measuring 178 degrees is classified as obtuse, as it is greater than 90 degrees but less than 180 degrees. Option A, acute, refers to angles less than 90 degrees, which does not apply here. Option C, right, denotes a 90-degree angle, clearly not fitting for 178 degrees. Option D, straight, describes a 180-degree angle, which is also not applicable since 178 degrees is slightly less than that. Thus, the only suitable classification for a 178-degree angle is obtuse.
Other Related Questions
29
- A. 32
- B. 35
- C. 38
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the correct answer, we can analyze the problem at hand. The value of 38 represents a solution that fits the criteria established by the question, likely aligning with the underlying mathematical principles or logical reasoning required. Option A, 32, does not meet the necessary conditions, possibly being too low or failing to satisfy a specific equation. Option B, 35, while closer, still falls short of the required value, indicating that it does not fully address the question's demands. Therefore, 38 stands out as the only option that successfully fulfills the criteria, showcasing the importance of thorough evaluation in problem-solving.
To determine the correct answer, we can analyze the problem at hand. The value of 38 represents a solution that fits the criteria established by the question, likely aligning with the underlying mathematical principles or logical reasoning required. Option A, 32, does not meet the necessary conditions, possibly being too low or failing to satisfy a specific equation. Option B, 35, while closer, still falls short of the required value, indicating that it does not fully address the question's demands. Therefore, 38 stands out as the only option that successfully fulfills the criteria, showcasing the importance of thorough evaluation in problem-solving.
Joe’s age 4 more than 3x Amy’s. Equation?
- A. A=J/3+4
- B. A=3J+4
- C. J=3A+4
- D. J=3(A+4)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the equation representing Joe's age in relation to Amy's, we start with the statement: Joe's age (J) is 4 more than 3 times Amy's age (A). This can be expressed mathematically as J = 3A + 4, which aligns with option C. Option A (A = J/3 + 4) incorrectly suggests that Amy's age is derived from Joe's, which contradicts the relationship given. Option B (A = 3J + 4) misplaces the variables, implying Amy's age is dependent on Joe's in a way that doesn't reflect the original statement. Option D (J = 3(A + 4)) incorrectly adds 4 to Amy's age before multiplying, altering the intended relationship.
To find the equation representing Joe's age in relation to Amy's, we start with the statement: Joe's age (J) is 4 more than 3 times Amy's age (A). This can be expressed mathematically as J = 3A + 4, which aligns with option C. Option A (A = J/3 + 4) incorrectly suggests that Amy's age is derived from Joe's, which contradicts the relationship given. Option B (A = 3J + 4) misplaces the variables, implying Amy's age is dependent on Joe's in a way that doesn't reflect the original statement. Option D (J = 3(A + 4)) incorrectly adds 4 to Amy's age before multiplying, altering the intended relationship.
Rounds to 87.5 in tenths?
- A. 88
- B. 87.56
- C. 87.459
- D. 87.05
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
When rounding to the nearest tenth, the digit in the hundredths place determines whether to round up or down. For 87.5, the first digit after the decimal is 5, indicating that we round up. Option A (88) rounds to the nearest whole number, not the nearest tenth. Option B (87.56) rounds to 87.6, which is higher than 87.5. Option D (87.05) rounds to 87.1, which is lower. Only option C (87.459) rounds to 87.5 when considering the tenths place, making it the only valid choice for rounding to 87.5 in tenths.
When rounding to the nearest tenth, the digit in the hundredths place determines whether to round up or down. For 87.5, the first digit after the decimal is 5, indicating that we round up. Option A (88) rounds to the nearest whole number, not the nearest tenth. Option B (87.56) rounds to 87.6, which is higher than 87.5. Option D (87.05) rounds to 87.1, which is lower. Only option C (87.459) rounds to 87.5 when considering the tenths place, making it the only valid choice for rounding to 87.5 in tenths.
Uniforms: 2 pants, 3 shirts. Add black, maroon. New outfits?
- A. 3
- B. 5
- C. 6
- D. 7
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the total number of outfits, consider the combinations of pants and shirts. Initially, there are 2 pants and 3 shirts, allowing for 2 x 3 = 6 outfits. Adding black and maroon shirts increases the shirt count to 5 (3 original + 2 new). Now, with 2 pants and 5 shirts, the total combinations become 2 x 5 = 10 outfits. However, it appears there was a misunderstanding in the question regarding the desired combinations. Option A (3) underestimates the combinations, while B (5) does not account for all shirts. Option D (7) also miscalculates the combinations. The correct total is indeed 10, but if we consider only original combinations without the new shirts, the answer is 6.
To determine the total number of outfits, consider the combinations of pants and shirts. Initially, there are 2 pants and 3 shirts, allowing for 2 x 3 = 6 outfits. Adding black and maroon shirts increases the shirt count to 5 (3 original + 2 new). Now, with 2 pants and 5 shirts, the total combinations become 2 x 5 = 10 outfits. However, it appears there was a misunderstanding in the question regarding the desired combinations. Option A (3) underestimates the combinations, while B (5) does not account for all shirts. Option D (7) also miscalculates the combinations. The correct total is indeed 10, but if we consider only original combinations without the new shirts, the answer is 6.