Prime numbers? Select ALL.
- A. 21
- B. 23
- C. 25
- D. 27
- E. 29
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B,E
Prime numbers are defined as natural numbers greater than 1 that have no positive divisors other than 1 and themselves. - **Option A: 21** is not prime because it can be divided by 1, 3, 7, and 21. - **Option B: 23** is prime; it has no divisors other than 1 and 23. - **Option C: 25** is not prime as it can be divided by 1, 5, and 25. - **Option D: 27** is not prime since it can be divided by 1, 3, 9, and 27. - **Option E: 29** is prime; it has no divisors other than 1 and 29. Thus, 23 and 29 are the only prime numbers in the list.
Prime numbers are defined as natural numbers greater than 1 that have no positive divisors other than 1 and themselves. - **Option A: 21** is not prime because it can be divided by 1, 3, 7, and 21. - **Option B: 23** is prime; it has no divisors other than 1 and 23. - **Option C: 25** is not prime as it can be divided by 1, 5, and 25. - **Option D: 27** is not prime since it can be divided by 1, 3, 9, and 27. - **Option E: 29** is prime; it has no divisors other than 1 and 29. Thus, 23 and 29 are the only prime numbers in the list.
Other Related Questions
Cost of 3 cans of peaches is $2.67. Cost of 8 cans?
- A. $5.34
- B. $7.12
- C. $8.01
- D. $21.36
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the cost of 8 cans of peaches, first calculate the cost per can. The cost of 3 cans is $2.67, so the cost per can is $2.67 ÷ 3 = $0.89. To find the cost of 8 cans, multiply the cost per can by 8: $0.89 × 8 = $7.12. Option A ($5.34) incorrectly assumes a lower total based on miscalculated per can pricing. Option C ($8.01) slightly overestimates the total, likely from rounding errors. Option D ($21.36) suggests a misunderstanding of basic multiplication, as it implies a much higher price than calculated. Thus, $7.12 accurately reflects the cost for 8 cans.
To determine the cost of 8 cans of peaches, first calculate the cost per can. The cost of 3 cans is $2.67, so the cost per can is $2.67 ÷ 3 = $0.89. To find the cost of 8 cans, multiply the cost per can by 8: $0.89 × 8 = $7.12. Option A ($5.34) incorrectly assumes a lower total based on miscalculated per can pricing. Option C ($8.01) slightly overestimates the total, likely from rounding errors. Option D ($21.36) suggests a misunderstanding of basic multiplication, as it implies a much higher price than calculated. Thus, $7.12 accurately reflects the cost for 8 cans.
Caterpillar 1 ft in 7.5 min. 18 min?
- A. 2.4
- B. 8
- C. 11.5
- D. 25.5
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine how far the caterpillar travels in 18 minutes, first calculate its speed. It moves 1 foot in 7.5 minutes, which equates to \( \frac{1 \text{ ft}}{7.5 \text{ min}} \). In 18 minutes, the distance covered can be calculated using the formula: \[ \text{Distance} = \text{Speed} \times \text{Time} \] Converting 18 minutes into feet: \[ \text{Distance} = \left(\frac{1 \text{ ft}}{7.5 \text{ min}}\right) \times 18 \text{ min} = 2.4 \text{ ft} \] Option B (8) overestimates the distance, while C (11.5) and D (25.5) significantly exceed the calculated distance, demonstrating a misunderstanding of the speed-time relationship.
To determine how far the caterpillar travels in 18 minutes, first calculate its speed. It moves 1 foot in 7.5 minutes, which equates to \( \frac{1 \text{ ft}}{7.5 \text{ min}} \). In 18 minutes, the distance covered can be calculated using the formula: \[ \text{Distance} = \text{Speed} \times \text{Time} \] Converting 18 minutes into feet: \[ \text{Distance} = \left(\frac{1 \text{ ft}}{7.5 \text{ min}}\right) \times 18 \text{ min} = 2.4 \text{ ft} \] Option B (8) overestimates the distance, while C (11.5) and D (25.5) significantly exceed the calculated distance, demonstrating a misunderstanding of the speed-time relationship.
Driveway for two cars, width?
- A. 0.7
- B. 7
- C. 70
- D. 700
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
A driveway for two cars typically requires a width of about 7 feet to accommodate standard vehicle sizes comfortably. Option A (0.7) is too narrow, as it would not allow even one car to fit. Option C (70) and Option D (700) are excessively wide for a residential driveway, making them impractical and unnecessary. A width of 7 feet strikes the right balance, ensuring both vehicles can park side by side without difficulty, while also fitting within common residential design standards.
A driveway for two cars typically requires a width of about 7 feet to accommodate standard vehicle sizes comfortably. Option A (0.7) is too narrow, as it would not allow even one car to fit. Option C (70) and Option D (700) are excessively wide for a residential driveway, making them impractical and unnecessary. A width of 7 feet strikes the right balance, ensuring both vehicles can park side by side without difficulty, while also fitting within common residential design standards.
3/4 as sum of unit fractions?
- A. 1/8 + 1/8 + 1/8 + 1/4 + 1/4
- B. 2/8 + 1/4 + 4/16
- C. 5/8 + 2/16
- D. 1/2 + 1/4
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To express \( \frac{3}{4} \) as a sum of unit fractions, each option must be evaluated for its total. Option A totals \( \frac{3}{8} + \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{8} + \frac{4}{8} = \frac{7}{8} \), which exceeds \( \frac{3}{4} \). Option B simplifies to \( \frac{2}{8} + \frac{2}{8} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{8} + \frac{2}{8} + \frac{2}{8} = \frac{6}{8} = \frac{3}{4} \), but includes non-unit fractions. Option C simplifies to \( \frac{5}{8} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{5}{8} + \frac{2}{8} = \frac{7}{8} \), again exceeding \( \frac{3}{4} \). Option D correctly adds \( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{4} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{3}{4} \) using unit fractions only.
To express \( \frac{3}{4} \) as a sum of unit fractions, each option must be evaluated for its total. Option A totals \( \frac{3}{8} + \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{8} + \frac{4}{8} = \frac{7}{8} \), which exceeds \( \frac{3}{4} \). Option B simplifies to \( \frac{2}{8} + \frac{2}{8} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{8} + \frac{2}{8} + \frac{2}{8} = \frac{6}{8} = \frac{3}{4} \), but includes non-unit fractions. Option C simplifies to \( \frac{5}{8} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{5}{8} + \frac{2}{8} = \frac{7}{8} \), again exceeding \( \frac{3}{4} \). Option D correctly adds \( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{4} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{3}{4} \) using unit fractions only.