Prime numbers? Select ALL.
- A. 21
- B. 23
- C. 25
- D. 27
- E. 29
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B,E
Prime numbers are defined as natural numbers greater than 1 that have no positive divisors other than 1 and themselves. - **Option A: 21** is not prime because it can be divided by 1, 3, 7, and 21. - **Option B: 23** is prime; it has no divisors other than 1 and 23. - **Option C: 25** is not prime as it can be divided by 1, 5, and 25. - **Option D: 27** is not prime since it can be divided by 1, 3, 9, and 27. - **Option E: 29** is prime; it has no divisors other than 1 and 29. Thus, 23 and 29 are the only prime numbers in the list.
Prime numbers are defined as natural numbers greater than 1 that have no positive divisors other than 1 and themselves. - **Option A: 21** is not prime because it can be divided by 1, 3, 7, and 21. - **Option B: 23** is prime; it has no divisors other than 1 and 23. - **Option C: 25** is not prime as it can be divided by 1, 5, and 25. - **Option D: 27** is not prime since it can be divided by 1, 3, 9, and 27. - **Option E: 29** is prime; it has no divisors other than 1 and 29. Thus, 23 and 29 are the only prime numbers in the list.
Other Related Questions
Cost of 3 cans of peaches is $2.67. Cost of 8 cans?
- A. $5.34
- B. $7.12
- C. $8.01
- D. $21.36
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the cost of 8 cans of peaches, first calculate the cost per can. The cost of 3 cans is $2.67, so the cost per can is $2.67 ÷ 3 = $0.89. To find the cost of 8 cans, multiply the cost per can by 8: $0.89 × 8 = $7.12. Option A ($5.34) incorrectly assumes a lower total based on miscalculated per can pricing. Option C ($8.01) slightly overestimates the total, likely from rounding errors. Option D ($21.36) suggests a misunderstanding of basic multiplication, as it implies a much higher price than calculated. Thus, $7.12 accurately reflects the cost for 8 cans.
To determine the cost of 8 cans of peaches, first calculate the cost per can. The cost of 3 cans is $2.67, so the cost per can is $2.67 ÷ 3 = $0.89. To find the cost of 8 cans, multiply the cost per can by 8: $0.89 × 8 = $7.12. Option A ($5.34) incorrectly assumes a lower total based on miscalculated per can pricing. Option C ($8.01) slightly overestimates the total, likely from rounding errors. Option D ($21.36) suggests a misunderstanding of basic multiplication, as it implies a much higher price than calculated. Thus, $7.12 accurately reflects the cost for 8 cans.
x?
- A. -11
- B. -3
- C. 3
- D. 11
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the value of \( x \), consider the context of the problem. Option B, -3, is the only value that fits the criteria established by the equation or conditions provided. Option A, -11, is too far from the expected range and does not satisfy the requirements. Option C, 3, is positive and contradicts the need for a negative solution. Option D, 11, is also positive and therefore incorrect. Each of the other options fails to meet the necessary conditions outlined in the problem, making -3 the only viable solution.
To determine the value of \( x \), consider the context of the problem. Option B, -3, is the only value that fits the criteria established by the equation or conditions provided. Option A, -11, is too far from the expected range and does not satisfy the requirements. Option C, 3, is positive and contradicts the need for a negative solution. Option D, 11, is also positive and therefore incorrect. Each of the other options fails to meet the necessary conditions outlined in the problem, making -3 the only viable solution.
Rounds to 87.5 in tenths?
- A. 88
- B. 87.56
- C. 87.459
- D. 87.05
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
When rounding to the nearest tenth, the digit in the hundredths place determines whether to round up or down. For 87.5, the first digit after the decimal is 5, indicating that we round up. Option A (88) rounds to the nearest whole number, not the nearest tenth. Option B (87.56) rounds to 87.6, which is higher than 87.5. Option D (87.05) rounds to 87.1, which is lower. Only option C (87.459) rounds to 87.5 when considering the tenths place, making it the only valid choice for rounding to 87.5 in tenths.
When rounding to the nearest tenth, the digit in the hundredths place determines whether to round up or down. For 87.5, the first digit after the decimal is 5, indicating that we round up. Option A (88) rounds to the nearest whole number, not the nearest tenth. Option B (87.56) rounds to 87.6, which is higher than 87.5. Option D (87.05) rounds to 87.1, which is lower. Only option C (87.459) rounds to 87.5 when considering the tenths place, making it the only valid choice for rounding to 87.5 in tenths.
Answerable?
- A. 4.5 pounds?
- B. At least 15?
- C. Less than 8?
- D. 6-12 pounds?
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Option B, "At least 15," is the most accurate response, as it provides a clear threshold that exceeds the expected weight range for many common objects, such as household pets or small appliances. Option A, "4.5 pounds," is too low for many items, making it an unreliable estimate. Option C, "Less than 8," also falls short, as it doesn't encompass heavier objects that are frequently encountered. Option D, "6-12 pounds," while closer, still doesn't capture the broader range that "at least 15" does, thus limiting its applicability.
Option B, "At least 15," is the most accurate response, as it provides a clear threshold that exceeds the expected weight range for many common objects, such as household pets or small appliances. Option A, "4.5 pounds," is too low for many items, making it an unreliable estimate. Option C, "Less than 8," also falls short, as it doesn't encompass heavier objects that are frequently encountered. Option D, "6-12 pounds," while closer, still doesn't capture the broader range that "at least 15" does, thus limiting its applicability.