Graph for data over time?
- A. Bar
- B. Line
- C. Stem-and-leaf
- D. Box-and-whisker
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
A line graph is ideal for displaying data over time as it effectively shows trends and changes by connecting data points with a continuous line, making it easy to visualize patterns. Option A, a bar graph, is better suited for comparing discrete categories rather than illustrating changes over time. Option C, a stem-and-leaf plot, is primarily used for displaying the distribution of numerical data and is not designed for time-series analysis. Option D, a box-and-whisker plot, summarizes data distribution and highlights outliers but does not convey trends over time effectively.
A line graph is ideal for displaying data over time as it effectively shows trends and changes by connecting data points with a continuous line, making it easy to visualize patterns. Option A, a bar graph, is better suited for comparing discrete categories rather than illustrating changes over time. Option C, a stem-and-leaf plot, is primarily used for displaying the distribution of numerical data and is not designed for time-series analysis. Option D, a box-and-whisker plot, summarizes data distribution and highlights outliers but does not convey trends over time effectively.
Other Related Questions
Leslie descended 714 ft in 34 s, took 1 min 25 s to ground. Total distance?
- A. 1,270 feet
- B. 1,515 feet
- C. 1,785 feet
- D. 2,615 feet
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the total distance Leslie descended, first convert the time taken to ground into seconds: 1 minute and 25 seconds equals 85 seconds. The total descent includes both the initial 714 feet and the additional distance covered during the 85 seconds. Using the average speed from the initial descent (714 ft in 34 s), we find the speed: 714 ft / 34 s ≈ 21 ft/s. Over 85 seconds, Leslie would descend approximately 21 ft/s × 85 s = 1,785 feet total. Option A (1,270 ft) underestimates the descent. Option B (1,515 ft) is also too low. Option D (2,615 ft) overestimates the total distance. Thus, C (1,785 ft) accurately reflects the total descent.
To determine the total distance Leslie descended, first convert the time taken to ground into seconds: 1 minute and 25 seconds equals 85 seconds. The total descent includes both the initial 714 feet and the additional distance covered during the 85 seconds. Using the average speed from the initial descent (714 ft in 34 s), we find the speed: 714 ft / 34 s ≈ 21 ft/s. Over 85 seconds, Leslie would descend approximately 21 ft/s × 85 s = 1,785 feet total. Option A (1,270 ft) underestimates the descent. Option B (1,515 ft) is also too low. Option D (2,615 ft) overestimates the total distance. Thus, C (1,785 ft) accurately reflects the total descent.
3(2x+5)+4x+7?
- A. 6x+12
- B. 10x+22
- C. 10x+12
- D. 25x+7
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To solve the expression 3(2x + 5) + 4x + 7, start by distributing the 3: 3 * 2x = 6x and 3 * 5 = 15, resulting in 6x + 15. Next, combine this with the other terms: 6x + 15 + 4x + 7. Combining like terms gives: (6x + 4x) + (15 + 7) = 10x + 22. Option A (6x + 12) incorrectly simplifies the expression. Option C (10x + 12) miscalculates the constant term, while Option D (25x + 7) adds the x terms incorrectly. Thus, option B accurately represents the simplified expression.
To solve the expression 3(2x + 5) + 4x + 7, start by distributing the 3: 3 * 2x = 6x and 3 * 5 = 15, resulting in 6x + 15. Next, combine this with the other terms: 6x + 15 + 4x + 7. Combining like terms gives: (6x + 4x) + (15 + 7) = 10x + 22. Option A (6x + 12) incorrectly simplifies the expression. Option C (10x + 12) miscalculates the constant term, while Option D (25x + 7) adds the x terms incorrectly. Thus, option B accurately represents the simplified expression.
1.085/12 value?
- A. 90
- B. 90 * 5/1.085
- C. 90 * 5/12
- D. 90.5
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the value of 1.085/12, we need to simplify the expression. Option C, 90 * 5/12, correctly represents a simplified fraction of 90 divided by 12, multiplied by 5. This yields a value consistent with the original division. Option A (90) is incorrect as it does not involve the division by 12. Option B (90 * 5/1.085) incorrectly uses 1.085 as a divisor instead of 12, leading to an inaccurate calculation. Option D (90.5) is also incorrect as it does not relate to the division of 1.085 by 12, resulting in a value that does not reflect the operation required.
To find the value of 1.085/12, we need to simplify the expression. Option C, 90 * 5/12, correctly represents a simplified fraction of 90 divided by 12, multiplied by 5. This yields a value consistent with the original division. Option A (90) is incorrect as it does not involve the division by 12. Option B (90 * 5/1.085) incorrectly uses 1.085 as a divisor instead of 12, leading to an inaccurate calculation. Option D (90.5) is also incorrect as it does not relate to the division of 1.085 by 12, resulting in a value that does not reflect the operation required.
3/4 as sum of unit fractions?
- A. 1/8 + 1/8 + 1/8 + 1/4 + 1/4
- B. 2/8 + 1/4 + 4/16
- C. 5/8 + 2/16
- D. 1/2 + 1/4
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To express \( \frac{3}{4} \) as a sum of unit fractions, each option must be evaluated for its total. Option A totals \( \frac{3}{8} + \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{8} + \frac{4}{8} = \frac{7}{8} \), which exceeds \( \frac{3}{4} \). Option B simplifies to \( \frac{2}{8} + \frac{2}{8} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{8} + \frac{2}{8} + \frac{2}{8} = \frac{6}{8} = \frac{3}{4} \), but includes non-unit fractions. Option C simplifies to \( \frac{5}{8} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{5}{8} + \frac{2}{8} = \frac{7}{8} \), again exceeding \( \frac{3}{4} \). Option D correctly adds \( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{4} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{3}{4} \) using unit fractions only.
To express \( \frac{3}{4} \) as a sum of unit fractions, each option must be evaluated for its total. Option A totals \( \frac{3}{8} + \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{8} + \frac{4}{8} = \frac{7}{8} \), which exceeds \( \frac{3}{4} \). Option B simplifies to \( \frac{2}{8} + \frac{2}{8} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{8} + \frac{2}{8} + \frac{2}{8} = \frac{6}{8} = \frac{3}{4} \), but includes non-unit fractions. Option C simplifies to \( \frac{5}{8} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{5}{8} + \frac{2}{8} = \frac{7}{8} \), again exceeding \( \frac{3}{4} \). Option D correctly adds \( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{4} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{3}{4} \) using unit fractions only.