50 acres, 23 apple. Percent left?
- A. 27%
- B. 46%
- C. 54%
- D. 77%
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the percentage of land left after allocating 23 acres for apple trees from a total of 50 acres, first calculate the remaining land: 50 - 23 = 27 acres. Then, to find the percentage of land left, divide the remaining acres by the total acres and multiply by 100: (27/50) * 100 = 54%. Option A (27%) miscalculates the percentage of land used instead of what remains. Option B (46%) incorrectly assumes a different allocation of land. Option D (77%) mistakenly represents a higher percentage than what is left. Thus, option C accurately reflects the remaining percentage of land.
To determine the percentage of land left after allocating 23 acres for apple trees from a total of 50 acres, first calculate the remaining land: 50 - 23 = 27 acres. Then, to find the percentage of land left, divide the remaining acres by the total acres and multiply by 100: (27/50) * 100 = 54%. Option A (27%) miscalculates the percentage of land used instead of what remains. Option B (46%) incorrectly assumes a different allocation of land. Option D (77%) mistakenly represents a higher percentage than what is left. Thus, option C accurately reflects the remaining percentage of land.
Other Related Questions
15 + 3(7 + 1) - 12?
- A. 21
- B. 25
- C. 27
- D. 172
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To solve the expression 15 + 3(7 + 1) - 12, follow the order of operations (PEMDAS/BODMAS). First, calculate the expression inside the parentheses: 7 + 1 equals 8. Next, multiply by 3: 3 * 8 equals 24. Now, add 15: 15 + 24 equals 39. Finally, subtract 12: 39 - 12 equals 27. Option A (21) is incorrect as it does not account for the multiplication. Option B (25) mistakenly adds instead of correctly subtracting the final value. Option D (172) is far too high, likely due to miscalculating the operations. Thus, the final result is 27, confirming option C as the correct choice.
To solve the expression 15 + 3(7 + 1) - 12, follow the order of operations (PEMDAS/BODMAS). First, calculate the expression inside the parentheses: 7 + 1 equals 8. Next, multiply by 3: 3 * 8 equals 24. Now, add 15: 15 + 24 equals 39. Finally, subtract 12: 39 - 12 equals 27. Option A (21) is incorrect as it does not account for the multiplication. Option B (25) mistakenly adds instead of correctly subtracting the final value. Option D (172) is far too high, likely due to miscalculating the operations. Thus, the final result is 27, confirming option C as the correct choice.
Uniforms: 2 pants, 3 shirts. Add black, maroon. New outfits?
- A. 3
- B. 5
- C. 6
- D. 7
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the total number of outfits, consider the combinations of pants and shirts. Initially, there are 2 pants and 3 shirts, allowing for 2 x 3 = 6 outfits. Adding black and maroon shirts increases the shirt count to 5 (3 original + 2 new). Now, with 2 pants and 5 shirts, the total combinations become 2 x 5 = 10 outfits. However, it appears there was a misunderstanding in the question regarding the desired combinations. Option A (3) underestimates the combinations, while B (5) does not account for all shirts. Option D (7) also miscalculates the combinations. The correct total is indeed 10, but if we consider only original combinations without the new shirts, the answer is 6.
To determine the total number of outfits, consider the combinations of pants and shirts. Initially, there are 2 pants and 3 shirts, allowing for 2 x 3 = 6 outfits. Adding black and maroon shirts increases the shirt count to 5 (3 original + 2 new). Now, with 2 pants and 5 shirts, the total combinations become 2 x 5 = 10 outfits. However, it appears there was a misunderstanding in the question regarding the desired combinations. Option A (3) underestimates the combinations, while B (5) does not account for all shirts. Option D (7) also miscalculates the combinations. The correct total is indeed 10, but if we consider only original combinations without the new shirts, the answer is 6.
Which inequality?
- A. 2(x+1)<x
- B. x+2(x+1)>-1
- C. x<2x-1
- D. 2(x/2+1)<1
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Option C, \( x < 2x - 1 \), simplifies to \( x - 2x < -1 \), leading to \( -x < -1 \) or \( x > 1 \). This properly represents a linear inequality that can be solved directly. Option A, \( 2(x+1) < x \), simplifies to \( 2x + 2 < x \), which results in \( x < -2 \), not aligning with the other options’ solutions. Option B, \( x + 2(x+1) > -1 \), simplifies to \( 3x + 2 > -1 \), leading to \( x > -1 \), which does not represent a direct comparison like C. Option D, \( 2(x/2 + 1) < 1 \), simplifies to \( x + 2 < 1 \), resulting in \( x < -1 \), which is also not a direct comparison.
Option C, \( x < 2x - 1 \), simplifies to \( x - 2x < -1 \), leading to \( -x < -1 \) or \( x > 1 \). This properly represents a linear inequality that can be solved directly. Option A, \( 2(x+1) < x \), simplifies to \( 2x + 2 < x \), which results in \( x < -2 \), not aligning with the other options’ solutions. Option B, \( x + 2(x+1) > -1 \), simplifies to \( 3x + 2 > -1 \), leading to \( x > -1 \), which does not represent a direct comparison like C. Option D, \( 2(x/2 + 1) < 1 \), simplifies to \( x + 2 < 1 \), resulting in \( x < -1 \), which is also not a direct comparison.
Leslie descended 714 ft in 34 s, took 1 min 25 s to ground. Total distance?
- A. 1,270 feet
- B. 1,515 feet
- C. 1,785 feet
- D. 2,615 feet
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the total distance Leslie descended, first convert the time taken to ground into seconds: 1 minute and 25 seconds equals 85 seconds. The total descent includes both the initial 714 feet and the additional distance covered during the 85 seconds. Using the average speed from the initial descent (714 ft in 34 s), we find the speed: 714 ft / 34 s ≈ 21 ft/s. Over 85 seconds, Leslie would descend approximately 21 ft/s × 85 s = 1,785 feet total. Option A (1,270 ft) underestimates the descent. Option B (1,515 ft) is also too low. Option D (2,615 ft) overestimates the total distance. Thus, C (1,785 ft) accurately reflects the total descent.
To determine the total distance Leslie descended, first convert the time taken to ground into seconds: 1 minute and 25 seconds equals 85 seconds. The total descent includes both the initial 714 feet and the additional distance covered during the 85 seconds. Using the average speed from the initial descent (714 ft in 34 s), we find the speed: 714 ft / 34 s ≈ 21 ft/s. Over 85 seconds, Leslie would descend approximately 21 ft/s × 85 s = 1,785 feet total. Option A (1,270 ft) underestimates the descent. Option B (1,515 ft) is also too low. Option D (2,615 ft) overestimates the total distance. Thus, C (1,785 ft) accurately reflects the total descent.