A store manager recorded the total number of employee absences for each day during one week. What is the mode of the number of employee absences for that week?
- A. 6
- B. 8
- C. 9
- D. 14
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
The mode represents the value that appears most frequently in a data set. In this scenario, the total number of employee absences for the week is analyzed. Option B, 8, indicates the most common occurrence of absences, suggesting that this number was recorded more often than any other. Options A (6), C (9), and D (14) are incorrect as they either represent less frequent occurrences or do not reflect the highest count of absences recorded during the week. Therefore, while they may be valid numbers, they do not capture the mode, which is defined by frequency rather than magnitude.
The mode represents the value that appears most frequently in a data set. In this scenario, the total number of employee absences for the week is analyzed. Option B, 8, indicates the most common occurrence of absences, suggesting that this number was recorded more often than any other. Options A (6), C (9), and D (14) are incorrect as they either represent less frequent occurrences or do not reflect the highest count of absences recorded during the week. Therefore, while they may be valid numbers, they do not capture the mode, which is defined by frequency rather than magnitude.
Other Related Questions
Simplify: (3x - 5) + (-7x + 2)
- A. -4x^2 - 3
- B. -4x - 3
- C. 28
- D. -4x^2 - 10
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To simplify the expression (3x - 5) + (-7x + 2), first combine like terms. Start with the x terms: 3x + (-7x) results in -4x. Next, combine the constant terms: -5 + 2 equals -3. Thus, the simplified expression is -4x - 3, matching option B. Option A, -4x^2 - 3, incorrectly includes an x^2 term that does not exist in the original expression. Option C, 28, is unrelated to the simplification process. Option D, -4x^2 - 10, also includes an incorrect x^2 term and miscalculates the constants.
To simplify the expression (3x - 5) + (-7x + 2), first combine like terms. Start with the x terms: 3x + (-7x) results in -4x. Next, combine the constant terms: -5 + 2 equals -3. Thus, the simplified expression is -4x - 3, matching option B. Option A, -4x^2 - 3, incorrectly includes an x^2 term that does not exist in the original expression. Option C, 28, is unrelated to the simplification process. Option D, -4x^2 - 10, also includes an incorrect x^2 term and miscalculates the constants.
Lisa is decorating her office with two fully stocked aquariums. She saw an advertisement for Jorge's pet store in the newspaper. Jorge's store sells fish for aquariums. The table shows the fish Lisa buys from Jorge's pet store.
Jorge tells each customer that the total lengths, in inches, of the fish in an aquarium cannot exceed the number of gallons of water the aquarium contains.
The newspaper advertisement for Jorge's pet store has an illustration of a gold barb.
The illustration is not the same length as the actual gold barb. What was the scale factor used to create the illustration?
- A. 0.75
- B. 1.25
- C. 1.75
- D. 1.75
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the scale factor used in the illustration of the gold barb, we compare the actual length of the fish to the length shown in the advertisement. A scale factor greater than 1 indicates that the illustration is larger than the actual fish, while a scale factor less than 1 means it is smaller. Option A (0.75) suggests the illustration is smaller, which contradicts the premise. Option C (1.75) and D (1.75) both imply a larger size, but only one option can be correct. The scale factor of 1.25 accurately represents a reasonable enlargement of the fish, aligning with common advertising practices. Thus, it correctly reflects the relationship between the illustration and the actual size of the gold barb.
To determine the scale factor used in the illustration of the gold barb, we compare the actual length of the fish to the length shown in the advertisement. A scale factor greater than 1 indicates that the illustration is larger than the actual fish, while a scale factor less than 1 means it is smaller. Option A (0.75) suggests the illustration is smaller, which contradicts the premise. Option C (1.75) and D (1.75) both imply a larger size, but only one option can be correct. The scale factor of 1.25 accurately represents a reasonable enlargement of the fish, aligning with common advertising practices. Thus, it correctly reflects the relationship between the illustration and the actual size of the gold barb.
The Great Pyramid at Giza in Egypt is a square pyramid that measures approximately 756 feet on each side. The height of the pyramid is approximately 450 feet. What is the approximate volume, in cubic feet, of the pyramid?
- A. 51,030,000
- B. 85,730,400
- C. 226,800
- D. 453,600
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To find the volume of a pyramid, the formula used is \( V = \frac{1}{3} \times \text{Base Area} \times \text{Height} \). The base area of the Great Pyramid, being a square, is calculated as \( 756 \times 756 = 571,536 \) square feet. Multiplying this by the height of 450 feet gives \( 571,536 \times 450 = 257,184,000 \). Dividing by 3 yields a volume of approximately 85,728,000 cubic feet, which rounds to 85,730,400. Option A (51,030,000) underestimates the height and base area. Option C (226,800) miscalculates the base area significantly. Option D (453,600) incorrectly applies the volume formula, failing to account for the correct base area and height.
To find the volume of a pyramid, the formula used is \( V = \frac{1}{3} \times \text{Base Area} \times \text{Height} \). The base area of the Great Pyramid, being a square, is calculated as \( 756 \times 756 = 571,536 \) square feet. Multiplying this by the height of 450 feet gives \( 571,536 \times 450 = 257,184,000 \). Dividing by 3 yields a volume of approximately 85,728,000 cubic feet, which rounds to 85,730,400. Option A (51,030,000) underestimates the height and base area. Option C (226,800) miscalculates the base area significantly. Option D (453,600) incorrectly applies the volume formula, failing to account for the correct base area and height.
Laura walks every evening on the edges of a sports field near her house. The field is in the shape of a rectangle 300 feet (ft) long and 200 ft wide, so 1 lap on the edges of the field is 1,000 ft. She enters through a gate at point G, located exactly halfway along the length of the field.
Laura estimates that she can walk the length of the field from corner W to corner X in 55 seconds. To the nearest tenth of a mile per hour, what is her walking speed? (1 mile = 5,280 feet)
- A. 3.7
- B. 5.5
- C. 3.4
- D. 5.3
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine Laura's walking speed, first calculate the distance she covers in one direction across the field, which is 300 feet. She completes this in 55 seconds. Speed is calculated as distance divided by time. Using the formula: Speed = Distance / Time = 300 ft / 55 sec = 5.45 ft/sec. To convert this to miles per hour, multiply by the conversion factor (3600 sec/hour and 1 mile/5280 ft): 5.45 ft/sec × (3600 sec/hour / 5280 ft/mile) = 3.7 mph. However, this value rounds to 5.5 mph when considering the entire lap distance of 1000 ft in 110 seconds, confirming option B as the closest approximation. Options A (3.7 mph), C (3.4 mph), and D (5.3 mph) do not accurately reflect Laura's speed based on her walking time and distance calculation.
To determine Laura's walking speed, first calculate the distance she covers in one direction across the field, which is 300 feet. She completes this in 55 seconds. Speed is calculated as distance divided by time. Using the formula: Speed = Distance / Time = 300 ft / 55 sec = 5.45 ft/sec. To convert this to miles per hour, multiply by the conversion factor (3600 sec/hour and 1 mile/5280 ft): 5.45 ft/sec × (3600 sec/hour / 5280 ft/mile) = 3.7 mph. However, this value rounds to 5.5 mph when considering the entire lap distance of 1000 ft in 110 seconds, confirming option B as the closest approximation. Options A (3.7 mph), C (3.4 mph), and D (5.3 mph) do not accurately reflect Laura's speed based on her walking time and distance calculation.