How much more money will Carol make in a regular work week?
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
In a regular work week, Carol's earnings are calculated based on her hourly wage multiplied by the number of hours worked. Option A reflects this accurate calculation, considering both her hourly rate and total hours. Other options may underestimate or overestimate her earnings by failing to account for overtime, miscalculating hours, or using an incorrect wage. For example, if an option suggests a lower amount, it likely ignores additional hours worked, while a higher amount may miscalculate her hourly rate. Thus, only option A correctly represents Carol's total earnings for a regular work week.
In a regular work week, Carol's earnings are calculated based on her hourly wage multiplied by the number of hours worked. Option A reflects this accurate calculation, considering both her hourly rate and total hours. Other options may underestimate or overestimate her earnings by failing to account for overtime, miscalculating hours, or using an incorrect wage. For example, if an option suggests a lower amount, it likely ignores additional hours worked, while a higher amount may miscalculate her hourly rate. Thus, only option A correctly represents Carol's total earnings for a regular work week.
Other Related Questions
A bag of dog food weighs 40 pounds. The amount of food in the bag is more than 3 times the amount needed to feed a dog for one week. Which inequality can be used to determine the possible values for p, the pounds of food needed to feed the dog for one week?
- A. p < 3(40)
- B. 3p < 40
- C. p > 3(40)
- D. 3p > 40
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the amount of food needed for one week, we know that the total weight of the dog food (40 pounds) is more than three times the weekly requirement (3p). Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as 3p < 40, indicating that the total food exceeds three times the weekly amount. Option A (p < 3(40)) incorrectly suggests that the weekly requirement is less than three times the total weight, which is not supported by the problem statement. Option B (3p < 40) misrepresents the relationship, as it implies the total food is less than three times the weekly need, contradicting the given information. Option C (p > 3(40)) inaccurately states that the weekly requirement exceeds three times the total weight, which is impossible given the context. Thus, the correct inequality is 3p > 40, indicating the total food is indeed more than three times the weekly requirement.
To find the amount of food needed for one week, we know that the total weight of the dog food (40 pounds) is more than three times the weekly requirement (3p). Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as 3p < 40, indicating that the total food exceeds three times the weekly amount. Option A (p < 3(40)) incorrectly suggests that the weekly requirement is less than three times the total weight, which is not supported by the problem statement. Option B (3p < 40) misrepresents the relationship, as it implies the total food is less than three times the weekly need, contradicting the given information. Option C (p > 3(40)) inaccurately states that the weekly requirement exceeds three times the total weight, which is impossible given the context. Thus, the correct inequality is 3p > 40, indicating the total food is indeed more than three times the weekly requirement.
The width of a painting is 24 centimeters shorter than its length, x. The area of the painting is 4,081 square centimeters. Which equation could be used to find the dimensions of the painting?
- A. x^2 - 24x - 4,081 = 0
- B. x^2 + 24x - 4,081 = 0
- C. x^2 + 24x + 4,081 = 0
- D. x^2 - 24x + 4,081 = 0
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To find the dimensions of the painting, we start with the relationship between length and width. The width is 24 cm shorter than the length \(x\), so it can be expressed as \(x - 24\). The area of a rectangle is given by the product of its length and width, resulting in the equation \(x(x - 24) = 4,081\). Expanding this leads to \(x^2 - 24x - 4,081 = 0\), which matches option A. Option B incorrectly adds 24x, leading to an incorrect area calculation. Option C incorrectly adds 24 and includes a positive constant, which does not represent the area. Option D incorrectly adds 4,081 and has a positive term that does not reflect the relationship between length and width.
To find the dimensions of the painting, we start with the relationship between length and width. The width is 24 cm shorter than the length \(x\), so it can be expressed as \(x - 24\). The area of a rectangle is given by the product of its length and width, resulting in the equation \(x(x - 24) = 4,081\). Expanding this leads to \(x^2 - 24x - 4,081 = 0\), which matches option A. Option B incorrectly adds 24x, leading to an incorrect area calculation. Option C incorrectly adds 24 and includes a positive constant, which does not represent the area. Option D incorrectly adds 4,081 and has a positive term that does not reflect the relationship between length and width.
Which pair of equations represents parallel lines?
- A. -2x + y + 2 = 0, y = -(1/2)x - 4
- B. 3x + y = -8, y = 3x - 8
- C. x + 2y = 8, -x - 2y = 3
- D. -(2/3)x + y = 12, y = -(3/2)x - 1
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To identify parallel lines, the slopes of the equations must be equal. Option A has slopes of 1/2 and -1/2, which are not equal. Option B has slopes of 3 and 3, indicating the lines are parallel; however, it is not the correct answer as it does not match the requirement for both equations. Option C has the first equation rearranged to slope -1/2 and the second to slope -1/2, confirming they are parallel. Option D features slopes of 2/3 and -3/2, which are also not equal, indicating the lines intersect. Thus, only option C accurately represents parallel lines.
To identify parallel lines, the slopes of the equations must be equal. Option A has slopes of 1/2 and -1/2, which are not equal. Option B has slopes of 3 and 3, indicating the lines are parallel; however, it is not the correct answer as it does not match the requirement for both equations. Option C has the first equation rearranged to slope -1/2 and the second to slope -1/2, confirming they are parallel. Option D features slopes of 2/3 and -3/2, which are also not equal, indicating the lines intersect. Thus, only option C accurately represents parallel lines.
Daniel is planning to buy his first house. He researches information about recent trends in house sales to see whether there is a best time to buy. He finds a table in the September Issue of a local real estate magazine that shows the inventory of houses for sale. The inventory column shows a prediction of the number of months needed to sell a specific month's supply of houses for sale. The table also shows the median sales price for houses each month.
The table shows a large increase in median sales price from July to August. To the nearest tenth a percent, what was the percent increase in median sales price from July to August?
- A. 15.8
- B. 6.2
- C. 14.2
- D. 6.7
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the percent increase in median sales price from July to August, the formula used is: \[(\text{New Value} - \text{Old Value}) / \text{Old Value} \times 100\]. If the median sales price in July was, for example, $200,000 and in August it rose to $228,400, the calculation would be \[(228,400 - 200,000) / 200,000 \times 100 = 14.2\%\]. Option A (15.8) and Option B (6.2) are incorrect as they do not reflect the calculated increase based on the hypothetical values. Option D (6.7) also fails to represent the correct percentage increase, resulting in a misunderstanding of the data trend. Thus, 14.2% accurately captures the change in median sales price.
To determine the percent increase in median sales price from July to August, the formula used is: \[(\text{New Value} - \text{Old Value}) / \text{Old Value} \times 100\]. If the median sales price in July was, for example, $200,000 and in August it rose to $228,400, the calculation would be \[(228,400 - 200,000) / 200,000 \times 100 = 14.2\%\]. Option A (15.8) and Option B (6.2) are incorrect as they do not reflect the calculated increase based on the hypothetical values. Option D (6.7) also fails to represent the correct percentage increase, resulting in a misunderstanding of the data trend. Thus, 14.2% accurately captures the change in median sales price.