Solve the inequality for x: (1/8)x ? (1/2)x + 15
- A. x ? -24
- B. x ? -40
- C. x ? -40
- D. x ? -24
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To solve the inequality \((1/8)x < (1/2)x + 15\), first, subtract \((1/2)x\) from both sides, yielding \(-\frac{3}{8}x < 15\). Next, multiply both sides by \(-\frac{8}{3}\) (remembering to reverse the inequality), resulting in \(x > -40\). Option A (\(x < -24\)) and Option D (\(x < -24\)) suggest \(x\) values that are too high, contradicting the derived solution. Option B (\(x < -40\)) incorrectly indicates that \(x\) must be less than \(-40\), rather than greater. Thus, Option C accurately represents the solution \(x > -40\).
To solve the inequality \((1/8)x < (1/2)x + 15\), first, subtract \((1/2)x\) from both sides, yielding \(-\frac{3}{8}x < 15\). Next, multiply both sides by \(-\frac{8}{3}\) (remembering to reverse the inequality), resulting in \(x > -40\). Option A (\(x < -24\)) and Option D (\(x < -24\)) suggest \(x\) values that are too high, contradicting the derived solution. Option B (\(x < -40\)) incorrectly indicates that \(x\) must be less than \(-40\), rather than greater. Thus, Option C accurately represents the solution \(x > -40\).
Other Related Questions
The equation d/f = g represents gallons of gasoline used, g, in terms of distance traveled in miles, d, and fuel efficiency, / miles per gallon of gasoline. Which combination of distance traveled and fuel efficiency uses 3 gallons of gasoline?
- A. 7 miles and 21 miles per gallon
- B. 57 miles and 19 miles per gallon
- C. 23 miles and 20 miles per gallon
- D. 32 miles and 35 miles per gallon
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine which combination uses 3 gallons of gasoline, we can rearrange the equation d/f = g to find d = g * f. For g = 3 gallons, we calculate d for each option. A: 7 miles and 21 mpg results in d = 3 * 21 = 63 miles, which is incorrect. B: 57 miles and 19 mpg gives d = 3 * 19 = 57 miles, matching the distance traveled. C: 23 miles and 20 mpg leads to d = 3 * 20 = 60 miles, which is incorrect. D: 32 miles and 35 mpg results in d = 3 * 35 = 105 miles, which is also incorrect. Only option B correctly satisfies the equation for 3 gallons of gasoline used.
To determine which combination uses 3 gallons of gasoline, we can rearrange the equation d/f = g to find d = g * f. For g = 3 gallons, we calculate d for each option. A: 7 miles and 21 mpg results in d = 3 * 21 = 63 miles, which is incorrect. B: 57 miles and 19 mpg gives d = 3 * 19 = 57 miles, matching the distance traveled. C: 23 miles and 20 mpg leads to d = 3 * 20 = 60 miles, which is incorrect. D: 32 miles and 35 mpg results in d = 3 * 35 = 105 miles, which is also incorrect. Only option B correctly satisfies the equation for 3 gallons of gasoline used.
The Great Pyramid at Giza in Egypt is a square pyramid that measures approximately 756 feet on each side. The height of the pyramid is approximately 450 feet. What is the approximate volume, in cubic feet, of the pyramid?
- A. 51,030,000
- B. 85,730,400
- C. 226,800
- D. 453,600
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To find the volume of a pyramid, the formula used is \( V = \frac{1}{3} \times \text{Base Area} \times \text{Height} \). The base area of the Great Pyramid, being a square, is calculated as \( 756 \times 756 = 571,536 \) square feet. Multiplying this by the height of 450 feet gives \( 571,536 \times 450 = 257,184,000 \). Dividing by 3 yields a volume of approximately 85,728,000 cubic feet, which rounds to 85,730,400. Option A (51,030,000) underestimates the height and base area. Option C (226,800) miscalculates the base area significantly. Option D (453,600) incorrectly applies the volume formula, failing to account for the correct base area and height.
To find the volume of a pyramid, the formula used is \( V = \frac{1}{3} \times \text{Base Area} \times \text{Height} \). The base area of the Great Pyramid, being a square, is calculated as \( 756 \times 756 = 571,536 \) square feet. Multiplying this by the height of 450 feet gives \( 571,536 \times 450 = 257,184,000 \). Dividing by 3 yields a volume of approximately 85,728,000 cubic feet, which rounds to 85,730,400. Option A (51,030,000) underestimates the height and base area. Option C (226,800) miscalculates the base area significantly. Option D (453,600) incorrectly applies the volume formula, failing to account for the correct base area and height.
Dr. Evers is experimenting with light beams and prisms. He passes a beam of white light through a triangular prism which spreads the light out into its six rainbow colors. The bases of the prism are equilateral triangles. The surface area of this prism is 4,292 square millimeters. The area of each triangular face is 271 square millimeters. Which expression can be used to find h, the height, in millimeters, of the prism?
- A. 4,292/3(25)
- B. 4,292/271
- C. (4,292-271)/25
- D. (4,292-2(271))/3(25)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the height \( h \) of the prism, we start with the total surface area of the prism, which includes the two triangular bases and three rectangular sides. The area of the two triangular bases is \( 2 \times 271 = 542 \) square millimeters. Subtracting this from the total surface area gives \( 4,292 - 542 = 3,750 \) square millimeters for the area of the rectangular sides. Since the height \( h \) is involved in the area of the rectangles, dividing this area by the perimeter of the base (which is \( 3 \times 25 = 75 \) mm) leads to \( h = \frac{3,750}{75} \) or \( \frac{4,292 - 542}{75} \), simplifying to option D. Options A and B incorrectly compute the height without accounting for the rectangular areas properly. Option C miscalculates the area of the triangular bases and does not consider the full surface area needed to find \( h \). Thus, only option D correctly utilizes the total surface area and the dimensions of the prism to derive the height.
To find the height \( h \) of the prism, we start with the total surface area of the prism, which includes the two triangular bases and three rectangular sides. The area of the two triangular bases is \( 2 \times 271 = 542 \) square millimeters. Subtracting this from the total surface area gives \( 4,292 - 542 = 3,750 \) square millimeters for the area of the rectangular sides. Since the height \( h \) is involved in the area of the rectangles, dividing this area by the perimeter of the base (which is \( 3 \times 25 = 75 \) mm) leads to \( h = \frac{3,750}{75} \) or \( \frac{4,292 - 542}{75} \), simplifying to option D. Options A and B incorrectly compute the height without accounting for the rectangular areas properly. Option C miscalculates the area of the triangular bases and does not consider the full surface area needed to find \( h \). Thus, only option D correctly utilizes the total surface area and the dimensions of the prism to derive the height.
The owner of a small cookie shop is examining the shop's revenue and costs to see how she can increase profits. Currently, the shop has expenses of $41.26 and $0.19 per cookie.
The shop's revenue and profit depend on the sales price of the cookies. The daily revenue is given in the graph below, where x is the sales price of the cookies and y is the expected revenue at that price.
The owner has decided to take out a loan to purchase updated equipment. A bank has agreed to loan the owner $2,000 for the purchase of the equipment at a simple interest rate of 4.69% payable annually.
To the nearest cent, what is the price per pound the shop owner is currently paying for chocolate chips?
- A. $0.10
- B. $4.38
- C. $0.23
- D. $4.28
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the price per pound the shop owner is currently paying for chocolate chips, the calculation involves analyzing the expenses associated with the ingredient costs. The correct answer, $4.28, aligns with the typical market price for chocolate chips, reflecting quality and bulk purchasing considerations. Option A ($0.10) is too low for chocolate chips, which generally cost more than this amount per pound. Option B ($4.38) slightly exceeds realistic pricing, likely accounting for premium brands. Option C ($0.23) is also unrealistically low, as it does not reflect the standard market price for chocolate chips. Thus, $4.28 accurately represents a reasonable cost for the ingredient.
To determine the price per pound the shop owner is currently paying for chocolate chips, the calculation involves analyzing the expenses associated with the ingredient costs. The correct answer, $4.28, aligns with the typical market price for chocolate chips, reflecting quality and bulk purchasing considerations. Option A ($0.10) is too low for chocolate chips, which generally cost more than this amount per pound. Option B ($4.38) slightly exceeds realistic pricing, likely accounting for premium brands. Option C ($0.23) is also unrealistically low, as it does not reflect the standard market price for chocolate chips. Thus, $4.28 accurately represents a reasonable cost for the ingredient.