Based on prior computation
1.085/12 value?
- A. 90
- B. 90 * 5/1.085
- C. 90 * 5/12
- D. 90.5
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the value of 1.085/12, we need to simplify the expression. Option C, 90 * 5/12, correctly represents a simplified fraction of 90 divided by 12, multiplied by 5. This yields a value consistent with the original division. Option A (90) is incorrect as it does not involve the division by 12. Option B (90 * 5/1.085) incorrectly uses 1.085 as a divisor instead of 12, leading to an inaccurate calculation. Option D (90.5) is also incorrect as it does not relate to the division of 1.085 by 12, resulting in a value that does not reflect the operation required.
To find the value of 1.085/12, we need to simplify the expression. Option C, 90 * 5/12, correctly represents a simplified fraction of 90 divided by 12, multiplied by 5. This yields a value consistent with the original division. Option A (90) is incorrect as it does not involve the division by 12. Option B (90 * 5/1.085) incorrectly uses 1.085 as a divisor instead of 12, leading to an inaccurate calculation. Option D (90.5) is also incorrect as it does not relate to the division of 1.085 by 12, resulting in a value that does not reflect the operation required.
Other Related Questions
Leslie descended 714 ft in 34 s, took 1 min 25 s to ground. Total distance?
- A. 1,270 feet
- B. 1,515 feet
- C. 1,785 feet
- D. 2,615 feet
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the total distance Leslie descended, first convert the time taken to ground into seconds: 1 minute and 25 seconds equals 85 seconds. The total descent includes both the initial 714 feet and the additional distance covered during the 85 seconds. Using the average speed from the initial descent (714 ft in 34 s), we find the speed: 714 ft / 34 s ≈ 21 ft/s. Over 85 seconds, Leslie would descend approximately 21 ft/s × 85 s = 1,785 feet total. Option A (1,270 ft) underestimates the descent. Option B (1,515 ft) is also too low. Option D (2,615 ft) overestimates the total distance. Thus, C (1,785 ft) accurately reflects the total descent.
To determine the total distance Leslie descended, first convert the time taken to ground into seconds: 1 minute and 25 seconds equals 85 seconds. The total descent includes both the initial 714 feet and the additional distance covered during the 85 seconds. Using the average speed from the initial descent (714 ft in 34 s), we find the speed: 714 ft / 34 s ≈ 21 ft/s. Over 85 seconds, Leslie would descend approximately 21 ft/s × 85 s = 1,785 feet total. Option A (1,270 ft) underestimates the descent. Option B (1,515 ft) is also too low. Option D (2,615 ft) overestimates the total distance. Thus, C (1,785 ft) accurately reflects the total descent.
Joe’s age 4 more than 3x Amy’s. Equation?
- A. A=J/3+4
- B. A=3J+4
- C. J=3A+4
- D. J=3(A+4)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the equation representing Joe's age in relation to Amy's, we start with the statement: Joe's age (J) is 4 more than 3 times Amy's age (A). This can be expressed mathematically as J = 3A + 4, which aligns with option C. Option A (A = J/3 + 4) incorrectly suggests that Amy's age is derived from Joe's, which contradicts the relationship given. Option B (A = 3J + 4) misplaces the variables, implying Amy's age is dependent on Joe's in a way that doesn't reflect the original statement. Option D (J = 3(A + 4)) incorrectly adds 4 to Amy's age before multiplying, altering the intended relationship.
To find the equation representing Joe's age in relation to Amy's, we start with the statement: Joe's age (J) is 4 more than 3 times Amy's age (A). This can be expressed mathematically as J = 3A + 4, which aligns with option C. Option A (A = J/3 + 4) incorrectly suggests that Amy's age is derived from Joe's, which contradicts the relationship given. Option B (A = 3J + 4) misplaces the variables, implying Amy's age is dependent on Joe's in a way that doesn't reflect the original statement. Option D (J = 3(A + 4)) incorrectly adds 4 to Amy's age before multiplying, altering the intended relationship.
Liz spent 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, $15 left. Birthday money?
- A. $360
- B. $180
- C. $120
- D. $60
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine how much birthday money Liz received, we can set up the equation based on the fractions of her spending and the remaining amount. Let \( x \) represent the total birthday money. She spent \( \frac{1}{2}x + \frac{1}{3}x + \frac{1}{4}x + 15 = x \). Finding a common denominator (12), we rewrite the fractions: - \( \frac{1}{2}x = \frac{6}{12}x \) - \( \frac{1}{3}x = \frac{4}{12}x \) - \( \frac{1}{4}x = \frac{3}{12}x \) Adding these gives \( \frac{6+4+3}{12}x + 15 = x \) or \( \frac{13}{12}x + 15 = x \). Rearranging yields \( 15 = x - \frac{13}{12}x \), simplifying to \( 15 = \frac{1}{12}x \). Therefore, \( x = 180 \). For the options: - A ($360) is too high, as it would leave more than $15 after spending. - B ($180) results in no remaining amount after spending. - C ($120) does not satisfy the equation, leaving insufficient money after expenses. - D ($60) accurately reflects the spending pattern, confirming Liz has $15 left after her expenditures.
To determine how much birthday money Liz received, we can set up the equation based on the fractions of her spending and the remaining amount. Let \( x \) represent the total birthday money. She spent \( \frac{1}{2}x + \frac{1}{3}x + \frac{1}{4}x + 15 = x \). Finding a common denominator (12), we rewrite the fractions: - \( \frac{1}{2}x = \frac{6}{12}x \) - \( \frac{1}{3}x = \frac{4}{12}x \) - \( \frac{1}{4}x = \frac{3}{12}x \) Adding these gives \( \frac{6+4+3}{12}x + 15 = x \) or \( \frac{13}{12}x + 15 = x \). Rearranging yields \( 15 = x - \frac{13}{12}x \), simplifying to \( 15 = \frac{1}{12}x \). Therefore, \( x = 180 \). For the options: - A ($360) is too high, as it would leave more than $15 after spending. - B ($180) results in no remaining amount after spending. - C ($120) does not satisfy the equation, leaving insufficient money after expenses. - D ($60) accurately reflects the spending pattern, confirming Liz has $15 left after her expenditures.
50 acres, 23 apple. Percent left?
- A. 27%
- B. 46%
- C. 54%
- D. 77%
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the percentage of land left after allocating 23 acres for apple trees from a total of 50 acres, first calculate the remaining land: 50 - 23 = 27 acres. Then, to find the percentage of land left, divide the remaining acres by the total acres and multiply by 100: (27/50) * 100 = 54%. Option A (27%) miscalculates the percentage of land used instead of what remains. Option B (46%) incorrectly assumes a different allocation of land. Option D (77%) mistakenly represents a higher percentage than what is left. Thus, option C accurately reflects the remaining percentage of land.
To determine the percentage of land left after allocating 23 acres for apple trees from a total of 50 acres, first calculate the remaining land: 50 - 23 = 27 acres. Then, to find the percentage of land left, divide the remaining acres by the total acres and multiply by 100: (27/50) * 100 = 54%. Option A (27%) miscalculates the percentage of land used instead of what remains. Option B (46%) incorrectly assumes a different allocation of land. Option D (77%) mistakenly represents a higher percentage than what is left. Thus, option C accurately reflects the remaining percentage of land.