Which equation represents the graphed line?
- A. y = -1/3x +3
- B. y = 3x - 7
- C. y = 3x + 7
- D. y = 1/3x + 1
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The equation y = 1/3x + 1 accurately represents the graphed line due to its positive slope of 1/3, indicating a gradual upward rise, consistent with the line’s direction. The y-intercept of 1 shows that the line crosses the y-axis at the point (0, 1), aligning perfectly with the graph. Option A, with a slope of -1/3, suggests a downward trend, which contradicts the graph’s upward slope. Option B has a much steeper slope of 3, leading to a different angle of rise. Option C also has a slope of 3 and a y-intercept of 7, which does not match the graph’s intercept. Thus, only D accurately reflects both the slope and intercept of the line shown.
The equation y = 1/3x + 1 accurately represents the graphed line due to its positive slope of 1/3, indicating a gradual upward rise, consistent with the line’s direction. The y-intercept of 1 shows that the line crosses the y-axis at the point (0, 1), aligning perfectly with the graph. Option A, with a slope of -1/3, suggests a downward trend, which contradicts the graph’s upward slope. Option B has a much steeper slope of 3, leading to a different angle of rise. Option C also has a slope of 3 and a y-intercept of 7, which does not match the graph’s intercept. Thus, only D accurately reflects both the slope and intercept of the line shown.
Other Related Questions
What is the area, in square inches, of a circle with diameter 2 inches?
- A. 6.28
- B. 3.14
- C. 1
- D. 12.56
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To find the area of a circle, the formula \( A = \pi r^2 \) is used, where \( r \) is the radius. Given a diameter of 2 inches, the radius is 1 inch. Substituting this into the formula yields \( A = \pi (1)^2 = \pi \), which approximates to 3.14. Option A (6.28) incorrectly doubles the area, possibly confusing it with the circumference. Option C (1) neglects the use of \(\pi\), leading to an inaccurate calculation. Option D (12.56) mistakenly uses the formula for circumference, multiplying the diameter by \(\pi\) instead of squaring the radius. Thus, 3.14 accurately represents the area of the circle.
To find the area of a circle, the formula \( A = \pi r^2 \) is used, where \( r \) is the radius. Given a diameter of 2 inches, the radius is 1 inch. Substituting this into the formula yields \( A = \pi (1)^2 = \pi \), which approximates to 3.14. Option A (6.28) incorrectly doubles the area, possibly confusing it with the circumference. Option C (1) neglects the use of \(\pi\), leading to an inaccurate calculation. Option D (12.56) mistakenly uses the formula for circumference, multiplying the diameter by \(\pi\) instead of squaring the radius. Thus, 3.14 accurately represents the area of the circle.
A scale drawing of a truck has a length of 3 inches (in.), as shown below. The actual truck has a length of 18 feet (ft). What scale was used for the drawing?
- A. 6 in. = 1 ft
- B. 1 in. = 15 ft
- C. 1 in. = 6 ft
- D. 15 in. = 1 ft
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the scale used for the drawing, we first convert the actual truck length from feet to inches. Since 1 foot equals 12 inches, an 18-foot truck is 216 inches long (18 ft x 12 in/ft). The scale drawing shows a length of 3 inches. To find the scale, we set up the ratio of the drawing length to the actual length: 3 in. (drawing) to 216 in. (actual). Simplifying this gives us a scale of 1 in. = 72 in., which translates to 1 in. = 6 ft (since 72 in. ÷ 12 in/ft = 6 ft). Option A (6 in. = 1 ft) is incorrect; it implies a much larger drawing. Option B (1 in. = 15 ft) underestimates the actual size. Option D (15 in. = 1 ft) greatly exaggerates the scale, making the drawing too small.
To determine the scale used for the drawing, we first convert the actual truck length from feet to inches. Since 1 foot equals 12 inches, an 18-foot truck is 216 inches long (18 ft x 12 in/ft). The scale drawing shows a length of 3 inches. To find the scale, we set up the ratio of the drawing length to the actual length: 3 in. (drawing) to 216 in. (actual). Simplifying this gives us a scale of 1 in. = 72 in., which translates to 1 in. = 6 ft (since 72 in. ÷ 12 in/ft = 6 ft). Option A (6 in. = 1 ft) is incorrect; it implies a much larger drawing. Option B (1 in. = 15 ft) underestimates the actual size. Option D (15 in. = 1 ft) greatly exaggerates the scale, making the drawing too small.
The owner of a small cookie shop is examining the shop's revenue and costs to see how she can increase profits. Currently, the shop has expenses of $41.26 and $0.19 per cookie.
The shop's revenue and profit depend on the sales price of the cookies. The daily revenue is given in the graph below, where x is the sales price of the cookies and y is the expected revenue at that price.
The owner has decided to take out a loan to purchase updated equipment. A bank has agreed to loan the owner $2,000 for the purchase of the equipment at a simple interest rate of 4.69% payable annually.
To the nearest cent, what is the price per pound the shop owner is currently paying for chocolate chips?
- A. $0.10
- B. $4.38
- C. $0.23
- D. $4.28
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the price per pound the shop owner is currently paying for chocolate chips, the calculation involves analyzing the expenses associated with the ingredient costs. The correct answer, $4.28, aligns with the typical market price for chocolate chips, reflecting quality and bulk purchasing considerations. Option A ($0.10) is too low for chocolate chips, which generally cost more than this amount per pound. Option B ($4.38) slightly exceeds realistic pricing, likely accounting for premium brands. Option C ($0.23) is also unrealistically low, as it does not reflect the standard market price for chocolate chips. Thus, $4.28 accurately represents a reasonable cost for the ingredient.
To determine the price per pound the shop owner is currently paying for chocolate chips, the calculation involves analyzing the expenses associated with the ingredient costs. The correct answer, $4.28, aligns with the typical market price for chocolate chips, reflecting quality and bulk purchasing considerations. Option A ($0.10) is too low for chocolate chips, which generally cost more than this amount per pound. Option B ($4.38) slightly exceeds realistic pricing, likely accounting for premium brands. Option C ($0.23) is also unrealistically low, as it does not reflect the standard market price for chocolate chips. Thus, $4.28 accurately represents a reasonable cost for the ingredient.
Lisa is decorating her office with two fully stocked aquariums. She saw an advertisement for Jorge's pet store in the newspaper. Jorge's store sells fish for aquariums. The table shows the fish Lisa buys from Jorge's pet store.
Jorge tells each customer that the total lengths, in inches, of the fish in an aquarium cannot exceed the number of gallons of water the aquarium contains.
The newspaper advertisement for Jorge's pet store has an illustration of a gold barb.
The illustration is not the same length as the actual gold barb. What was the scale factor used to create the illustration?
- A. 0.75
- B. 1.25
- C. 1.75
- D. 1.75
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the scale factor used in the illustration of the gold barb, we compare the actual length of the fish to the length shown in the advertisement. A scale factor greater than 1 indicates that the illustration is larger than the actual fish, while a scale factor less than 1 means it is smaller. Option A (0.75) suggests the illustration is smaller, which contradicts the premise. Option C (1.75) and D (1.75) both imply a larger size, but only one option can be correct. The scale factor of 1.25 accurately represents a reasonable enlargement of the fish, aligning with common advertising practices. Thus, it correctly reflects the relationship between the illustration and the actual size of the gold barb.
To determine the scale factor used in the illustration of the gold barb, we compare the actual length of the fish to the length shown in the advertisement. A scale factor greater than 1 indicates that the illustration is larger than the actual fish, while a scale factor less than 1 means it is smaller. Option A (0.75) suggests the illustration is smaller, which contradicts the premise. Option C (1.75) and D (1.75) both imply a larger size, but only one option can be correct. The scale factor of 1.25 accurately represents a reasonable enlargement of the fish, aligning with common advertising practices. Thus, it correctly reflects the relationship between the illustration and the actual size of the gold barb.