The triangle shown in the diagram has an area of 24 square centimeters. What is h, the height in centimeters, of the triangle?
- A. 9
- B. 4
- C. 8
- D. 2
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the height \( h \) of the triangle, we use the area formula: \( \text{Area} = \frac{1}{2} \times \text{base} \times \text{height} \). Given the area is 24 cm², we can rearrange the formula to solve for \( h \): \( h = \frac{2 \times \text{Area}}{\text{base}} \). Assuming the base is 6 cm (since \( 24 = \frac{1}{2} \times 6 \times h \)), substituting gives \( h = \frac{48}{6} = 8 \). - Option A (9) is too high, as it would yield an area greater than 24 cm². - Option B (4) results in an area of only 12 cm², which is insufficient. - Option D (2) yields an area of 6 cm², far below the required area. Thus, only option C (8) satisfies the area requirement.
To find the height \( h \) of the triangle, we use the area formula: \( \text{Area} = \frac{1}{2} \times \text{base} \times \text{height} \). Given the area is 24 cm², we can rearrange the formula to solve for \( h \): \( h = \frac{2 \times \text{Area}}{\text{base}} \). Assuming the base is 6 cm (since \( 24 = \frac{1}{2} \times 6 \times h \)), substituting gives \( h = \frac{48}{6} = 8 \). - Option A (9) is too high, as it would yield an area greater than 24 cm². - Option B (4) results in an area of only 12 cm², which is insufficient. - Option D (2) yields an area of 6 cm², far below the required area. Thus, only option C (8) satisfies the area requirement.
Other Related Questions
Factor the expression completely: 45bcx - 10ax
- A. 5x(9bc - 2a)
- B. 5(9bc - 2a)
- C. x(45bc - 10a)
- D. 5x(9bc + 2a)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To factor the expression 45bcx - 10ax completely, we start by identifying the greatest common factor (GCF). The GCF of the coefficients 45 and 10 is 5, and both terms contain the variable x. Thus, we can factor out 5x, resulting in 5x(9bc - 2a). Option A accurately reflects this factorization. Option B lacks the variable x, which is essential in the original expression. Option C incorrectly factors out only x, missing the GCF of 5. Option D alters the sign of the second term, which does not represent the original expression correctly.
To factor the expression 45bcx - 10ax completely, we start by identifying the greatest common factor (GCF). The GCF of the coefficients 45 and 10 is 5, and both terms contain the variable x. Thus, we can factor out 5x, resulting in 5x(9bc - 2a). Option A accurately reflects this factorization. Option B lacks the variable x, which is essential in the original expression. Option C incorrectly factors out only x, missing the GCF of 5. Option D alters the sign of the second term, which does not represent the original expression correctly.
What is the slope of a line perpendicular to the line given by the equation 5x - 2y = -10?
- A. -0.4
- B. 2\5
- C. 5\2
- D. -2.5
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To find the slope of a line perpendicular to the given equation \(5x - 2y = -10\), we first convert it to slope-intercept form (y = mx + b). Rearranging gives \(y = \frac{5}{2}x + 5\), revealing a slope (m) of \(\frac{5}{2}\). The slope of a line perpendicular to another is the negative reciprocal, which is \(-\frac{2}{5}\). Option A (-0.4) is equivalent to \(-\frac{2}{5}\), which is incorrect as it represents a decimal form. Option C (\(\frac{5}{2}\)) is the slope of the original line, not its perpendicular. Option D (-2.5) does not represent the correct negative reciprocal either.
To find the slope of a line perpendicular to the given equation \(5x - 2y = -10\), we first convert it to slope-intercept form (y = mx + b). Rearranging gives \(y = \frac{5}{2}x + 5\), revealing a slope (m) of \(\frac{5}{2}\). The slope of a line perpendicular to another is the negative reciprocal, which is \(-\frac{2}{5}\). Option A (-0.4) is equivalent to \(-\frac{2}{5}\), which is incorrect as it represents a decimal form. Option C (\(\frac{5}{2}\)) is the slope of the original line, not its perpendicular. Option D (-2.5) does not represent the correct negative reciprocal either.
Solve the equation for x: (2x-3)/5 = x/10
- A. 2
- B. 3
- C. 1\5
- D. 10
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To solve the equation \((2x-3)/5 = x/10\), first eliminate the fractions by multiplying both sides by 10, resulting in \(2(2x - 3) = x\). Simplifying gives \(4x - 6 = x\). Rearranging leads to \(4x - x = 6\), or \(3x = 6\), giving \(x = 2\). Option B (3) does not satisfy the equation when substituted back. Option C (1/5) results in a negative left side, while Option D (10) leads to an incorrect balance in the original equation. Thus, the only solution that holds true is \(x = 2\).
To solve the equation \((2x-3)/5 = x/10\), first eliminate the fractions by multiplying both sides by 10, resulting in \(2(2x - 3) = x\). Simplifying gives \(4x - 6 = x\). Rearranging leads to \(4x - x = 6\), or \(3x = 6\), giving \(x = 2\). Option B (3) does not satisfy the equation when substituted back. Option C (1/5) results in a negative left side, while Option D (10) leads to an incorrect balance in the original equation. Thus, the only solution that holds true is \(x = 2\).
On a number line, what is the distance, in units, between 16 and -25
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: 41 units
To find the distance between two points on a number line, subtract the smaller number from the larger number. Here, the calculation is |16 - (-25)|, which simplifies to |16 + 25| = |41|. This results in a distance of 41 units. Other options may suggest incorrect calculations. For instance, an answer like 9 units might arise from simply adding the two numbers without considering their positions on the number line, leading to an inaccurate interpretation of distance. Similarly, options like 25 or 16 units misrepresent the actual distance by not accounting for both numbers' magnitudes relative to zero.
To find the distance between two points on a number line, subtract the smaller number from the larger number. Here, the calculation is |16 - (-25)|, which simplifies to |16 + 25| = |41|. This results in a distance of 41 units. Other options may suggest incorrect calculations. For instance, an answer like 9 units might arise from simply adding the two numbers without considering their positions on the number line, leading to an inaccurate interpretation of distance. Similarly, options like 25 or 16 units misrepresent the actual distance by not accounting for both numbers' magnitudes relative to zero.