((5^3 * 2^4)^2)(5^(-2) * 2^5)
- A. 5^3 * 2^11
- B. 5^(-12) * 2^40
- C. 5^4 * 2^13
- D. (-5)^8 * 2^13
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To simplify the expression \(((5^3 * 2^4)^2)(5^{-2} * 2^5)\), first apply the power of a product rule. This gives \(5^{6} * 2^{8}\) from the first part. Next, combine this with the second part, \(5^{-2} * 2^{5}\). Adding the exponents for the base 5: \(6 + (-2) = 4\). For base 2: \(8 + 5 = 13\). Thus, the final expression simplifies to \(5^4 * 2^{13}\). Option A is incorrect as it miscalculates the exponents. Option B has incorrect exponents and signs. Option D introduces an unnecessary negative sign and does not match the simplified expression.
To simplify the expression \(((5^3 * 2^4)^2)(5^{-2} * 2^5)\), first apply the power of a product rule. This gives \(5^{6} * 2^{8}\) from the first part. Next, combine this with the second part, \(5^{-2} * 2^{5}\). Adding the exponents for the base 5: \(6 + (-2) = 4\). For base 2: \(8 + 5 = 13\). Thus, the final expression simplifies to \(5^4 * 2^{13}\). Option A is incorrect as it miscalculates the exponents. Option B has incorrect exponents and signs. Option D introduces an unnecessary negative sign and does not match the simplified expression.
Other Related Questions
A bag of dog food weighs 40 pounds. The amount of food in the bag is more than 3 times the amount needed to feed a dog for one week. Which inequality can be used to determine the possible values for p, the pounds of food needed to feed the dog for one week?
- A. p < 3(40)
- B. 3p < 40
- C. p > 3(40)
- D. 3p > 40
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the amount of food needed for one week, we know that the total weight of the dog food (40 pounds) is more than three times the weekly requirement (3p). Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as 3p < 40, indicating that the total food exceeds three times the weekly amount. Option A (p < 3(40)) incorrectly suggests that the weekly requirement is less than three times the total weight, which is not supported by the problem statement. Option B (3p < 40) misrepresents the relationship, as it implies the total food is less than three times the weekly need, contradicting the given information. Option C (p > 3(40)) inaccurately states that the weekly requirement exceeds three times the total weight, which is impossible given the context. Thus, the correct inequality is 3p > 40, indicating the total food is indeed more than three times the weekly requirement.
To find the amount of food needed for one week, we know that the total weight of the dog food (40 pounds) is more than three times the weekly requirement (3p). Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as 3p < 40, indicating that the total food exceeds three times the weekly amount. Option A (p < 3(40)) incorrectly suggests that the weekly requirement is less than three times the total weight, which is not supported by the problem statement. Option B (3p < 40) misrepresents the relationship, as it implies the total food is less than three times the weekly need, contradicting the given information. Option C (p > 3(40)) inaccurately states that the weekly requirement exceeds three times the total weight, which is impossible given the context. Thus, the correct inequality is 3p > 40, indicating the total food is indeed more than three times the weekly requirement.
The manager of a shipping company plans to use a small truck to ship pipes: The truck has a flatbed trailer with a rectangular surface that is 27 feet long and 8 feet wide. The truck will travel from Atherton to Bakersfield, where some pipes will be delivered, and then on to Castlewood to deliver the remaining pipes. The map shows the roads that connect Atherton. Bakersfield. and Castlewood.
The manager is planning to buy a new truck with better gas mileage. He collected data bout the gas mileage of one of the company's trucks. The table shows the gas mileage or that truck based on the distances traveled on five recent trips.
How many different ways can the truck travel from Atherton to Bakersfield a to Castlewood, using the roads on the map?
- A. 6
- B. 8
- C. 9
- D. 5
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine the number of different routes from Atherton to Bakersfield and then to Castlewood, we analyze the connections between these locations. If there are 3 distinct paths from Atherton to Bakersfield and 2 distinct paths from Bakersfield to Castlewood, the total number of combinations is found by multiplying the number of options: 3 paths (Atherton to Bakersfield) × 2 paths (Bakersfield to Castlewood) = 6 routes. Options B (8), C (9), and D (5) miscalculate the available paths or overlook the combinations of routes, leading to incorrect totals. Thus, the correct answer accurately reflects the possible travel routes.
To determine the number of different routes from Atherton to Bakersfield and then to Castlewood, we analyze the connections between these locations. If there are 3 distinct paths from Atherton to Bakersfield and 2 distinct paths from Bakersfield to Castlewood, the total number of combinations is found by multiplying the number of options: 3 paths (Atherton to Bakersfield) × 2 paths (Bakersfield to Castlewood) = 6 routes. Options B (8), C (9), and D (5) miscalculate the available paths or overlook the combinations of routes, leading to incorrect totals. Thus, the correct answer accurately reflects the possible travel routes.
The Great Pyramid at Giza in Egypt is a square pyramid that measures approximately 756 feet on each side. The height of the pyramid is approximately 450 feet. What is the approximate volume, in cubic feet, of the pyramid?
- A. 51,030,000
- B. 85,730,400
- C. 226,800
- D. 453,600
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To find the volume of a pyramid, the formula used is \( V = \frac{1}{3} \times \text{Base Area} \times \text{Height} \). The base area of the Great Pyramid, being a square, is calculated as \( 756 \times 756 = 571,536 \) square feet. Multiplying this by the height of 450 feet gives \( 571,536 \times 450 = 257,184,000 \). Dividing by 3 yields a volume of approximately 85,728,000 cubic feet, which rounds to 85,730,400. Option A (51,030,000) underestimates the height and base area. Option C (226,800) miscalculates the base area significantly. Option D (453,600) incorrectly applies the volume formula, failing to account for the correct base area and height.
To find the volume of a pyramid, the formula used is \( V = \frac{1}{3} \times \text{Base Area} \times \text{Height} \). The base area of the Great Pyramid, being a square, is calculated as \( 756 \times 756 = 571,536 \) square feet. Multiplying this by the height of 450 feet gives \( 571,536 \times 450 = 257,184,000 \). Dividing by 3 yields a volume of approximately 85,728,000 cubic feet, which rounds to 85,730,400. Option A (51,030,000) underestimates the height and base area. Option C (226,800) miscalculates the base area significantly. Option D (453,600) incorrectly applies the volume formula, failing to account for the correct base area and height.
Two men are employed at a local supermarket. The table shows James's earnings, and the graph shows Eric's earnings.
Based on the information above, who earns the greater amount per hour, and how much does he earn for a 7-hour shift?
- A. James earns the greater amount per hour and earns $73.50 for a 7-hour shift.
- B. James earns the greater amount per hour and earns $70.00 for a 7-hour shift.
- C. Eric earns the greater amount per hour and earns $70.00 for a 7-hour shift.
- D. Eric earns the greater amount per hour and earns $73.50 for a 7-hour shift.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine who earns more per hour, one must compare the hourly rates of James and Eric. If Eric's hourly rate is higher, he earns more for a 7-hour shift, calculated as his hourly rate multiplied by 7. Option A incorrectly states James earns more and miscalculates his earnings. Option B also claims James earns more but provides the wrong total for a 7-hour shift. Option C correctly identifies Eric as the higher earner but misstates his total earnings for a 7-hour shift. Option D accurately identifies Eric as the higher earner and correctly calculates his earnings for a 7-hour shift at $73.50.
To determine who earns more per hour, one must compare the hourly rates of James and Eric. If Eric's hourly rate is higher, he earns more for a 7-hour shift, calculated as his hourly rate multiplied by 7. Option A incorrectly states James earns more and miscalculates his earnings. Option B also claims James earns more but provides the wrong total for a 7-hour shift. Option C correctly identifies Eric as the higher earner but misstates his total earnings for a 7-hour shift. Option D accurately identifies Eric as the higher earner and correctly calculates his earnings for a 7-hour shift at $73.50.