A cyclist can travel 17.6 feet per second. The cyclist would have a better understanding of her speed if it were measured in miles per hour. Which of these completes the expression used to convert the speed of the cyclist to miles per hour?
- A. 1 hour/60 seconds = 1 mile/5,280 feet
- B. 60 minutes/1 hour = 1 mile/5280 feet
- C. 60 minutes/1 hour = 5280 feet/1 mile
- D. 12 inches/1 foot = 60 minutes/1 hour
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To convert speed from feet per second to miles per hour, the conversion factors must relate time and distance appropriately. Option C correctly expresses the relationship between miles and feet, stating that 1 mile equals 5280 feet. Additionally, it includes the conversion of minutes to hours, with 60 minutes equating to 1 hour, which is essential for converting seconds to hours. Option A incorrectly suggests a different time conversion that mixes hours and seconds without properly aligning the units. Option B, while correctly stating the time conversion, mistakenly places the units in an incorrect order. Option D is irrelevant, as it focuses on inches and does not contribute to the necessary conversions for speed.
To convert speed from feet per second to miles per hour, the conversion factors must relate time and distance appropriately. Option C correctly expresses the relationship between miles and feet, stating that 1 mile equals 5280 feet. Additionally, it includes the conversion of minutes to hours, with 60 minutes equating to 1 hour, which is essential for converting seconds to hours. Option A incorrectly suggests a different time conversion that mixes hours and seconds without properly aligning the units. Option B, while correctly stating the time conversion, mistakenly places the units in an incorrect order. Option D is irrelevant, as it focuses on inches and does not contribute to the necessary conversions for speed.
Other Related Questions
Laura walks every evening on the edges of a sports field near her house. The field is in the shape of a rectangle 300 feet (ft) long and 200 ft wide, so 1 lap on the edges of the field is 1,000 ft. She enters through a gate at point G, located exactly halfway along the length of the field.
Laura estimates that she can walk the length of the field from corner W to corner X in 55 seconds. To the nearest tenth of a mile per hour, what is her walking speed? (1 mile = 5,280 feet)
- A. 3.7
- B. 5.5
- C. 3.4
- D. 5.3
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine Laura's walking speed, first calculate the distance she covers in one direction across the field, which is 300 feet. She completes this in 55 seconds. Speed is calculated as distance divided by time. Using the formula: Speed = Distance / Time = 300 ft / 55 sec = 5.45 ft/sec. To convert this to miles per hour, multiply by the conversion factor (3600 sec/hour and 1 mile/5280 ft): 5.45 ft/sec × (3600 sec/hour / 5280 ft/mile) = 3.7 mph. However, this value rounds to 5.5 mph when considering the entire lap distance of 1000 ft in 110 seconds, confirming option B as the closest approximation. Options A (3.7 mph), C (3.4 mph), and D (5.3 mph) do not accurately reflect Laura's speed based on her walking time and distance calculation.
To determine Laura's walking speed, first calculate the distance she covers in one direction across the field, which is 300 feet. She completes this in 55 seconds. Speed is calculated as distance divided by time. Using the formula: Speed = Distance / Time = 300 ft / 55 sec = 5.45 ft/sec. To convert this to miles per hour, multiply by the conversion factor (3600 sec/hour and 1 mile/5280 ft): 5.45 ft/sec × (3600 sec/hour / 5280 ft/mile) = 3.7 mph. However, this value rounds to 5.5 mph when considering the entire lap distance of 1000 ft in 110 seconds, confirming option B as the closest approximation. Options A (3.7 mph), C (3.4 mph), and D (5.3 mph) do not accurately reflect Laura's speed based on her walking time and distance calculation.
Factor completely: b^2 + 3b - 4
- A. (b + 4)(b - 1)
- B. (b - 2)(b - 3)
- C. (b + 1)(b + 2)
- D. (b + 3)(b - 1)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To factor the expression \( b^2 + 3b - 4 \), we need two numbers that multiply to \(-4\) (the constant term) and add to \(3\) (the coefficient of \(b\)). The numbers \(4\) and \(-1\) satisfy these conditions, leading to the factors \( (b + 4)(b - 1) \). Option B, \( (b - 2)(b - 3) \), yields \( b^2 - 5b + 6\), which does not match the original expression. Option C, \( (b + 1)(b + 2) \), results in \( b^2 + 3b + 2\), also incorrect due to the wrong sign on the constant term. Option D, \( (b + 3)(b - 1) \), gives \( b^2 + 2b - 3\), which again does not match. Thus, only option A correctly factors the expression.
To factor the expression \( b^2 + 3b - 4 \), we need two numbers that multiply to \(-4\) (the constant term) and add to \(3\) (the coefficient of \(b\)). The numbers \(4\) and \(-1\) satisfy these conditions, leading to the factors \( (b + 4)(b - 1) \). Option B, \( (b - 2)(b - 3) \), yields \( b^2 - 5b + 6\), which does not match the original expression. Option C, \( (b + 1)(b + 2) \), results in \( b^2 + 3b + 2\), also incorrect due to the wrong sign on the constant term. Option D, \( (b + 3)(b - 1) \), gives \( b^2 + 2b - 3\), which again does not match. Thus, only option A correctly factors the expression.
The triangle shown in the diagram has an area of 24 square centimeters. What is h, the height in centimeters, of the triangle?
- A. 9
- B. 4
- C. 8
- D. 2
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the height \( h \) of the triangle, we use the area formula: \( \text{Area} = \frac{1}{2} \times \text{base} \times \text{height} \). Given the area is 24 cm², we can rearrange the formula to solve for \( h \): \( h = \frac{2 \times \text{Area}}{\text{base}} \). Assuming the base is 6 cm (since \( 24 = \frac{1}{2} \times 6 \times h \)), substituting gives \( h = \frac{48}{6} = 8 \). - Option A (9) is too high, as it would yield an area greater than 24 cm². - Option B (4) results in an area of only 12 cm², which is insufficient. - Option D (2) yields an area of 6 cm², far below the required area. Thus, only option C (8) satisfies the area requirement.
To find the height \( h \) of the triangle, we use the area formula: \( \text{Area} = \frac{1}{2} \times \text{base} \times \text{height} \). Given the area is 24 cm², we can rearrange the formula to solve for \( h \): \( h = \frac{2 \times \text{Area}}{\text{base}} \). Assuming the base is 6 cm (since \( 24 = \frac{1}{2} \times 6 \times h \)), substituting gives \( h = \frac{48}{6} = 8 \). - Option A (9) is too high, as it would yield an area greater than 24 cm². - Option B (4) results in an area of only 12 cm², which is insufficient. - Option D (2) yields an area of 6 cm², far below the required area. Thus, only option C (8) satisfies the area requirement.
A shipping box for a refrigerator is shaped like a rectangular prism. The box has a depth of 34.25 inches (in.), a height of 69.37 in., and a width of 32.62 in. To the nearest hundredth cubic inch, what is the volume of the shipping bax?
- A. 2,262.85
- B. 77,502.59
- C. 136.24
- D. 25,834.20
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the volume of a rectangular prism, the formula \( V = \text{length} \times \text{width} \times \text{height} \) is applied. Given the dimensions—depth (length) of 34.25 in., width of 32.62 in., and height of 69.37 in.—the calculation yields a volume of approximately 77,502.59 cubic inches. Option A (2,262.85) is far too small, indicating a miscalculation. Option C (136.24) is implausibly low, likely resulting from using incorrect units or dimensions. Option D (25,834.20) is also incorrect, as it does not reflect the correct multiplication of the given dimensions. Thus, only option B accurately represents the calculated volume.
To determine the volume of a rectangular prism, the formula \( V = \text{length} \times \text{width} \times \text{height} \) is applied. Given the dimensions—depth (length) of 34.25 in., width of 32.62 in., and height of 69.37 in.—the calculation yields a volume of approximately 77,502.59 cubic inches. Option A (2,262.85) is far too small, indicating a miscalculation. Option C (136.24) is implausibly low, likely resulting from using incorrect units or dimensions. Option D (25,834.20) is also incorrect, as it does not reflect the correct multiplication of the given dimensions. Thus, only option B accurately represents the calculated volume.