The daily cost, C(x), tor a company to produce x microscopes is given by the equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. What is the cost of producing 50 microscopes?
- A. $41,250
- B. $360.50
- C. $15,525
- D. $825
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the cost of producing 50 microscopes, substitute x = 50 into the cost equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. This yields C(50) = 300 + 10.5(50), resulting in C(50) = 300 + 525 = 825. Thus, the cost for 50 microscopes is $825. Option A ($41,250) is incorrect as it likely results from a miscalculation or misunderstanding of the equation. Option B ($360.50) underestimates the production cost by omitting the correct multiplication factor. Option C ($15,525) suggests an error in the calculation, possibly misinterpreting the coefficients in the equation.
To find the cost of producing 50 microscopes, substitute x = 50 into the cost equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. This yields C(50) = 300 + 10.5(50), resulting in C(50) = 300 + 525 = 825. Thus, the cost for 50 microscopes is $825. Option A ($41,250) is incorrect as it likely results from a miscalculation or misunderstanding of the equation. Option B ($360.50) underestimates the production cost by omitting the correct multiplication factor. Option C ($15,525) suggests an error in the calculation, possibly misinterpreting the coefficients in the equation.
Other Related Questions
The width of a painting is 24 centimeters shorter than its length, x. The area of the painting is 4,081 square centimeters. Which equation could be used to find the dimensions of the painting?
- A. x^2 - 24x - 4,081 = 0
- B. x^2 + 24x - 4,081 = 0
- C. x^2 + 24x + 4,081 = 0
- D. x^2 - 24x + 4,081 = 0
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To find the dimensions of the painting, we start with the relationship between length and width. The width is 24 cm shorter than the length \(x\), so it can be expressed as \(x - 24\). The area of a rectangle is given by the product of its length and width, resulting in the equation \(x(x - 24) = 4,081\). Expanding this leads to \(x^2 - 24x - 4,081 = 0\), which matches option A. Option B incorrectly adds 24x, leading to an incorrect area calculation. Option C incorrectly adds 24 and includes a positive constant, which does not represent the area. Option D incorrectly adds 4,081 and has a positive term that does not reflect the relationship between length and width.
To find the dimensions of the painting, we start with the relationship between length and width. The width is 24 cm shorter than the length \(x\), so it can be expressed as \(x - 24\). The area of a rectangle is given by the product of its length and width, resulting in the equation \(x(x - 24) = 4,081\). Expanding this leads to \(x^2 - 24x - 4,081 = 0\), which matches option A. Option B incorrectly adds 24x, leading to an incorrect area calculation. Option C incorrectly adds 24 and includes a positive constant, which does not represent the area. Option D incorrectly adds 4,081 and has a positive term that does not reflect the relationship between length and width.
The daily cost, C(x), for a company to produce x microscopes is given by the equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. What is the cost of producing 50 microscopes?
- A. $41,250
- B. $360.50
- C. $15,525
- D. $825
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the cost of producing 50 microscopes, substitute x = 50 into the equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. This gives C(50) = 300 + 10.5(50) = 300 + 525 = 825. Thus, the total cost is $825. Option A ($41,250) is incorrect as it miscalculates the cost by multiplying incorrectly. Option B ($360.50) results from a misunderstanding of the equation, possibly neglecting the fixed cost. Option C ($15,525) likely arises from an error in multiplying the variable cost without adding the fixed cost. Each incorrect option fails to follow the proper calculation method outlined in the cost equation.
To determine the cost of producing 50 microscopes, substitute x = 50 into the equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. This gives C(50) = 300 + 10.5(50) = 300 + 525 = 825. Thus, the total cost is $825. Option A ($41,250) is incorrect as it miscalculates the cost by multiplying incorrectly. Option B ($360.50) results from a misunderstanding of the equation, possibly neglecting the fixed cost. Option C ($15,525) likely arises from an error in multiplying the variable cost without adding the fixed cost. Each incorrect option fails to follow the proper calculation method outlined in the cost equation.
Laura walks every evening on the edges of a sports field near her house. The field is in the shape of a rectangle 300 feet (ft) long and 200 ft wide, so 1 lap on the edges of the field is 1,000 ft. She enters through a gate at point G, located exactly halfway along the length of the field.
Laura counts the number of strides she takes during her daily walks. She takes about 80 strides to walk the width of the field from Z to W. Assuming that her stride length does not change, about how many strides does Laura take to walk all the way around the edge of the field?
- A. 267
- B. 320
- C. 450
- D. 400
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the number of strides Laura takes to walk around the field, we first calculate the total distance of one lap, which is 1,000 feet. Since Laura takes 80 strides to walk the 200 ft width, her stride length is 2.5 ft (200 ft ÷ 80 strides). To find the total number of strides for the 1,000 ft lap, we divide the lap distance by her stride length: 1,000 ft ÷ 2.5 ft/stride = 400 strides. Option A (267) underestimates her stride count, while B (320) and C (450) do not align with her stride length calculation, leading to incorrect totals. Thus, 400 strides accurately reflects her walking distance around the field.
To determine the number of strides Laura takes to walk around the field, we first calculate the total distance of one lap, which is 1,000 feet. Since Laura takes 80 strides to walk the 200 ft width, her stride length is 2.5 ft (200 ft ÷ 80 strides). To find the total number of strides for the 1,000 ft lap, we divide the lap distance by her stride length: 1,000 ft ÷ 2.5 ft/stride = 400 strides. Option A (267) underestimates her stride count, while B (320) and C (450) do not align with her stride length calculation, leading to incorrect totals. Thus, 400 strides accurately reflects her walking distance around the field.
Which graph shows a line described by 4x - 3y = 12?
-
A.
-
B.
-
C.
-
D.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine which graph represents the line described by the equation 4x - 3y = 12, we can rearrange it into slope-intercept form (y = mx + b). This yields y = (4/3)x - 4. The slope (m) is 4/3, indicating the line rises 4 units for every 3 units it runs to the right, and the y-intercept (b) is -4, meaning the line crosses the y-axis at (0, -4). Option D correctly displays a line with a positive slope and a y-intercept at -4. Options A, B, and C either have the wrong slope or intercept, indicating they do not accurately represent the given equation.
To determine which graph represents the line described by the equation 4x - 3y = 12, we can rearrange it into slope-intercept form (y = mx + b). This yields y = (4/3)x - 4. The slope (m) is 4/3, indicating the line rises 4 units for every 3 units it runs to the right, and the y-intercept (b) is -4, meaning the line crosses the y-axis at (0, -4). Option D correctly displays a line with a positive slope and a y-intercept at -4. Options A, B, and C either have the wrong slope or intercept, indicating they do not accurately represent the given equation.