The number line below shows the solution set of an inequality: Which two inequalities represent the graph shown?
- A. -2x>4 and 4x<-8
- B. 3x>-6 and x-4>6
- C. 4x<-8 and x≥6
- D. 4x<-8 and x≥6
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
The graph indicates a solution set that includes values greater than -2 and less than 6. Option B, with inequalities 3x > -6 and x - 4 > 6, accurately reflects this range. The first inequality simplifies to x > -2, aligning with the left boundary, while the second simplifies to x > 10, which is outside the range but indicates a direction. Options A, C, and D contain inequalities that do not match the solution set shown on the number line. A suggests values that are too extreme, while C and D incorrectly imply lower bounds that do not correspond to the graph's representation.
The graph indicates a solution set that includes values greater than -2 and less than 6. Option B, with inequalities 3x > -6 and x - 4 > 6, accurately reflects this range. The first inequality simplifies to x > -2, aligning with the left boundary, while the second simplifies to x > 10, which is outside the range but indicates a direction. Options A, C, and D contain inequalities that do not match the solution set shown on the number line. A suggests values that are too extreme, while C and D incorrectly imply lower bounds that do not correspond to the graph's representation.
Other Related Questions
A landscape worker is building a rock wall around a triangular flower garden. He has completed the rock wall on two sides of the garden.
The perimeter of the garden is 239 feet. What is the length, in feet, of the rock wall that the worker still needs to complete?
- A. 101
- B. 185
- C. 54
- D. 138
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the length of the rock wall still needed, first, the total perimeter of the triangular garden is 239 feet. The worker has already completed two sides, leaving one side to be built. To find the length of the remaining side, we subtract the lengths of the two completed sides from the total perimeter. The answer of 138 feet indicates that the lengths of the two sides combined equal 101 feet (239 - 138 = 101). Option A (101) represents the combined length of the two completed sides, not the remaining side. Option B (185) exceeds the total perimeter, which is impossible. Option C (54) does not fit the calculations based on the perimeter. Thus, only option D accurately reflects the length of the remaining side to complete the wall.
To determine the length of the rock wall still needed, first, the total perimeter of the triangular garden is 239 feet. The worker has already completed two sides, leaving one side to be built. To find the length of the remaining side, we subtract the lengths of the two completed sides from the total perimeter. The answer of 138 feet indicates that the lengths of the two sides combined equal 101 feet (239 - 138 = 101). Option A (101) represents the combined length of the two completed sides, not the remaining side. Option B (185) exceeds the total perimeter, which is impossible. Option C (54) does not fit the calculations based on the perimeter. Thus, only option D accurately reflects the length of the remaining side to complete the wall.
The daily cost, C(x), tor a company to produce x microscopes is given by the equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. What is the cost of producing 50 microscopes?
- A. $41,250
- B. $360.50
- C. $15,525
- D. $825
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the cost of producing 50 microscopes, substitute x = 50 into the cost equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. This yields C(50) = 300 + 10.5(50), resulting in C(50) = 300 + 525 = 825. Thus, the cost for 50 microscopes is $825. Option A ($41,250) is incorrect as it likely results from a miscalculation or misunderstanding of the equation. Option B ($360.50) underestimates the production cost by omitting the correct multiplication factor. Option C ($15,525) suggests an error in the calculation, possibly misinterpreting the coefficients in the equation.
To find the cost of producing 50 microscopes, substitute x = 50 into the cost equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. This yields C(50) = 300 + 10.5(50), resulting in C(50) = 300 + 525 = 825. Thus, the cost for 50 microscopes is $825. Option A ($41,250) is incorrect as it likely results from a miscalculation or misunderstanding of the equation. Option B ($360.50) underestimates the production cost by omitting the correct multiplication factor. Option C ($15,525) suggests an error in the calculation, possibly misinterpreting the coefficients in the equation.
The weight of a red blood cell is about 4.5 × 10*11 grams. A blood sample has 1.6 × 10 red blood cells. What is the total weight, in grams, of red blood cells in the sample the answer with the correct scientific notation.
- A. 2.9 × 10^18
- B. 7.2 × 10^(-4)
- C. 7.2 × 10^(-77)
- D. 6.1 × 10^(-4)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To find the total weight of the red blood cells, multiply the weight of one red blood cell (4.5 × 10^-11 grams) by the total number of cells (1.6 × 10^6). This calculation yields 7.2 × 10^-5 grams, which can be expressed in scientific notation as 7.2 × 10^(-4) grams. Option A (2.9 × 10^18) is incorrect because it suggests an unrealistically high total weight, indicating a misunderstanding of scientific notation. Options C (7.2 × 10^(-77)) and D (6.1 × 10^(-4)) also fail to represent the correct multiplication, with C being far too small and D lacking accuracy in the calculated value.
To find the total weight of the red blood cells, multiply the weight of one red blood cell (4.5 × 10^-11 grams) by the total number of cells (1.6 × 10^6). This calculation yields 7.2 × 10^-5 grams, which can be expressed in scientific notation as 7.2 × 10^(-4) grams. Option A (2.9 × 10^18) is incorrect because it suggests an unrealistically high total weight, indicating a misunderstanding of scientific notation. Options C (7.2 × 10^(-77)) and D (6.1 × 10^(-4)) also fail to represent the correct multiplication, with C being far too small and D lacking accuracy in the calculated value.
A scientist uses the expression 5/9(F - 32) to convert temperatures from degrees Fahrenheit (°F), F, to degrees Celsius (°C). To the nearest degree, what is the temperature, in °F, of a substance at -25°C?
- A. 13
- B. -32
- C. -13
- D. 18
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the Fahrenheit equivalent of -25°C, use the formula \( F = \frac{9}{5}C + 32 \). Substituting -25 for C gives \( F = \frac{9}{5}(-25) + 32 = -45 + 32 = -13 \). Thus, the temperature in Fahrenheit is -13°F. Option A (13°F) is incorrect as it does not reflect the negative temperature conversion. Option B (-32°F) is too low and does not correspond to the calculated value. Option D (18°F) is also incorrect as it is significantly higher than the expected result for -25°C.
To find the Fahrenheit equivalent of -25°C, use the formula \( F = \frac{9}{5}C + 32 \). Substituting -25 for C gives \( F = \frac{9}{5}(-25) + 32 = -45 + 32 = -13 \). Thus, the temperature in Fahrenheit is -13°F. Option A (13°F) is incorrect as it does not reflect the negative temperature conversion. Option B (-32°F) is too low and does not correspond to the calculated value. Option D (18°F) is also incorrect as it is significantly higher than the expected result for -25°C.