ged science and practice test

A a high school equivalency exam designed for individuals who did not graduate from high school but want to demonstrate they have the same knowledge and skills as a high school graduate

In 1908, a huge explosion known as the Tunguska Event flattened trees for miles across a remote area of Russia. Scientists now think an asteroid or a comet entered Earth's atmosphere, causing the explosion. Ice core samples from an ice sheet in Greenland reveal signs of this enormous explosion: deposits of ammonia equal to 5 micrograms per square meter. But how exactly did these telltale molecules form? • Hypothesis 1: The Tunguska explosion started forest fires, known to produce ammonia. Data indicates that such fires would have deposited an amount of ammonia over the Northern Hemisphere equaling 0.1 micrograms per square meter. • Hypothesis 2: Up to 1% of the object's mass might have been ammonia, and this ammonia might have spread over the Northern Hemisphere. Approximately 0.00005 micrograms of ammonia per square meter are predicted by this hypothesis. • Hypothesis 3: Since many compounds form in the presence of high heat, the ammonia could have been produced as the falling object heated the atmosphere. However, heat alone is not sufficient to cause the formation of ammonia. • Hypothesis 4: As it passed through the atmosphere, the object pushed air in front of it at high pressure. Nitrogen and hydrogen combine to form ammonia under similar pressure. Considering the amount of hydrogen expected in a comet and the available nitrogen in Earth's atmosphere, approximately 5 micrograms of ammonia per square meter would have been deposited under this hypothesis.
Scientists have estimated the mass of the object that caused the Tunguska Event at 5 x 10^12 kilograms (kg). If the object was a comet in which 1% of total mass was ammonia, how much ammonia did the comet contain? kg
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: 5x10^10

To find the mass of ammonia in the comet, we calculate 1% of the total mass (5 x 10^12 kg). This is done by multiplying the total mass by 0.01: 5 x 10^12 kg × 0.01 = 5 x 10^10 kg. This calculation confirms that the comet contained 5 x 10^10 kg of ammonia. Other options may result from incorrect calculations, such as misunderstanding the percentage or misapplying the multiplication. For instance, using 0.1 instead of 0.01 would yield an answer ten times larger, while failing to convert the percentage to a decimal would also lead to an incorrect figure.

Other Related Questions

Scientists are Interested in whether certain greenhouse gases have helped cause I recent temperature increases. The graph presents data on carbon dioxide and methane gas levels in the atmosphere for the past several centuries. Human activities began producing large quantities of both gases in the 1700s. This graph, combined with information from--------------------, supports ----------------------.
Question image
  • A. The Milankovitch climate change model
  • B. paragraph 3
  • C. The anthropogenic climate change model
  • D. Paragraph 2
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B, C

The graph illustrates the correlation between rising greenhouse gas levels and temperature increases, supporting the anthropogenic climate change model, which attributes climate change to human activities. Options B and C effectively connect the visual data with the broader context of human influence on climate. Option A, referencing the Milankovitch model, is incorrect as this model focuses on natural Earth cycles, not human impact. Option D lacks specificity and does not directly relate to the evidence presented in the graph. Thus, B and C provide the most relevant support for understanding the relationship between greenhouse gas emissions and climate change.
The equation for photosynthesis is often written as shown below. Based on this equation, what does the triangle symbol represent?
Question image
  • A. oxygen
  • B. chloroplast
  • C. heat
  • D. light
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D

In the equation for photosynthesis, the triangle symbol represents light, which is essential for the process to occur. Plants capture light energy to convert carbon dioxide and water into glucose and oxygen. Option A, oxygen, is a product of photosynthesis but not represented by the triangle. Option B, chloroplast, is the organelle where photosynthesis takes place, but it is not indicated by the triangle symbol. Option C, heat, is not a direct component of the photosynthesis equation, as it does not play a role in the conversion process. Thus, light is the critical factor denoted by the triangle.
Which statement explains the central idea of the passage?
Question image
  • A. People should consume as much magnesium as possible to ensure good cardiovascular health.
  • B. People may experience health benefits from drinking hard water because it contains magnesium.
  • C. People who live in rural environments are healthier than people who live in urban environments.
  • D. People should stop the practice of softening water because it removes minerals that are necessary for good health.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B

Option B accurately reflects the central idea by highlighting the potential health benefits of magnesium found in hard water. This aligns with the passage's focus on the relationship between magnesium intake and cardiovascular health. Option A is misleading as it suggests an excessive intake of magnesium is necessary, while the passage likely emphasizes balance rather than maximum consumption. Option C incorrectly generalizes health comparisons between rural and urban populations without specific evidence from the passage. Option D misrepresents the passage's message by implying a complete cessation of water softening, rather than discussing the importance of maintaining essential minerals like magnesium.
Limestone and marble are often used in buildings. Both types of rock contain calcium carbonate, which is sensitive to chemical weathering by acids. A scientist conducted an experiment to test the effect of acid strength on calcium carbonate... Which change would reduce the possibility of error in the experiment?
Question image
  • A. performing the experiment with a different acid in the solution
  • B. performing multiple trials for each solution pH
  • C. using more of the acidic solution
  • D. using a solution with a pH below 3.00
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B

Performing multiple trials for each solution pH enhances the reliability of the experiment by allowing for the identification of consistent patterns and minimizing the impact of random errors. This approach provides a more accurate average result, leading to valid conclusions about the effect of acid strength on calcium carbonate. Option A introduces a variable that may not be relevant to the original question, potentially complicating the results. Option C does not address the variability inherent in a single trial, which could skew results. Option D restricts the experiment to a specific range of acidity, limiting the exploration of acid strength effects across a broader spectrum.