This excerpt is from a speech given by President Lyndon Johnson before a joint session of Congress in 1965.
1 I speak tonight for the dignity of man and the destiny of democracy....
2 At times history and fate meet at a single time in a single place to shape a turning point in man's unending search for freedom.... So it was a century ago at Appomattox. So it was last week in Selma, Alabama.
3 There, long-suffering men and women peacefully protested the denial of their rights as Americans. Many were brutally assaulted....
4 There is no constitutional issue here. The command of the Constitution is plain.
5 There is no moral issue. It is wrong, deadly wrong, to deny any of your fellow Americans the right to vote in this country.
6 There is no issue of States' rights or national rights. There is only the struggle for human rights....
7 We cannot... refuse to protect the right of every American to vote in every election that he may desire to participate in..Ù Ù
8 But even if we pass this bill, the battle will not be over.
9 Their cause must be our cause too. Because it is not just Negroes, but really it is all of us, who must overcome the crippling legacy of bigotry and injustice.
10 And we shall overcome..
11 This great, rich, restless country can offer opportunity and education and hope to all: black and white, North and South, sharecropper and city dweller. These are the enemies: poverty, Ignorance, disease. They are the enemies and not our fellow man, not our neighbor. And these enemies too, poverty, disease and ignorance, we shall overcome.
This excerpt is from a telegram Senator Richard Russell of Georgia sent to President Dwight Eisenhower in 1957.
12... As a citizen, as a senator of the United States, and as Chairman of the Senate Committee on Armed Services, I must vigorously protest the highhanded and illegal methods being
How did the position expressed by President Johnson differ from the position expressed by Senator Russell?
- A. Only Senator Russell said that state governments were sufficiently protecting the rights of citizens.
- B. Only Senator Russell supported the federal government's intervention.
- C. Only President Johnson supported the state governments' rights to manage their own affairs.
- D. Only President Johnson believed that the federal government was authorized to intervene.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
President Johnson emphasized the need for federal intervention to protect citizens' rights, believing that state governments were often inadequate. In contrast, Senator Russell argued that state governments were effectively safeguarding those rights, reflecting a stance of local governance. Option B is incorrect because Senator Russell did not support federal intervention. Option C misrepresents Johnson’s position; he favored federal oversight rather than state autonomy. Option D inaccurately attributes the belief in federal authority solely to Johnson, as Russell did not share this view. Thus, the distinction lies in Russell's confidence in state governments versus Johnson's call for federal action.
President Johnson emphasized the need for federal intervention to protect citizens' rights, believing that state governments were often inadequate. In contrast, Senator Russell argued that state governments were effectively safeguarding those rights, reflecting a stance of local governance. Option B is incorrect because Senator Russell did not support federal intervention. Option C misrepresents Johnson’s position; he favored federal oversight rather than state autonomy. Option D inaccurately attributes the belief in federal authority solely to Johnson, as Russell did not share this view. Thus, the distinction lies in Russell's confidence in state governments versus Johnson's call for federal action.
Other Related Questions
Which statement is correct about the change in racial and ethnic populations between 2000 and 2010?
- A. The Black or African American population had the greatest percentage of growth.
- B. The Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander population grew by a greater proportion than the Asian population.
- C. The White population experienced the slowest growth of all groups.
- D. The American Indian and Alaska Native population experienced almost no change.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Option B accurately reflects demographic trends, as the Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander population indeed saw a higher percentage increase compared to the Asian population during this period. Option A is incorrect; while the Black or African American population grew, it was not the greatest percentage increase among all racial groups. Option C misrepresents the data; although the White population's growth was slower compared to previous decades, it was not the slowest overall. Option D is misleading as well; the American Indian and Alaska Native population did experience some growth, albeit modest, rather than remaining unchanged.
Option B accurately reflects demographic trends, as the Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander population indeed saw a higher percentage increase compared to the Asian population during this period. Option A is incorrect; while the Black or African American population grew, it was not the greatest percentage increase among all racial groups. Option C misrepresents the data; although the White population's growth was slower compared to previous decades, it was not the slowest overall. Option D is misleading as well; the American Indian and Alaska Native population did experience some growth, albeit modest, rather than remaining unchanged.
Assuming that the majority of senators and representatives voted along party lines, which conclusion about the U.S. government in 2011 does the table support?
- A. The party that passed more legislation could be anticipated.
- B. The party that would win the next presidential election could be predicted.
- C. Party divisions were a challenge to the legislative process.
- D. Party affiliations are a requirement for congressional membership.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The data suggests that party divisions significantly impacted the legislative process in 2011, indicating that partisan alignment often hindered bipartisan cooperation. Option A incorrectly implies that the quantity of legislation passed directly correlates with party strength, which is not supported by the information. Option B assumes a direct link between legislative success and electoral outcomes, which cannot be inferred from party voting patterns alone. Option D misrepresents the nature of congressional membership, as party affiliation is not a formal requirement but rather a common practice among members.
The data suggests that party divisions significantly impacted the legislative process in 2011, indicating that partisan alignment often hindered bipartisan cooperation. Option A incorrectly implies that the quantity of legislation passed directly correlates with party strength, which is not supported by the information. Option B assumes a direct link between legislative success and electoral outcomes, which cannot be inferred from party voting patterns alone. Option D misrepresents the nature of congressional membership, as party affiliation is not a formal requirement but rather a common practice among members.
Which statement about the ratification of the 19th Amendment is based on the passage?
- A. Ratification was the result of the Seneca Falls Convention.
- B. Ratification occurred in return for the military service of women during World War I.
- C. Ratification occurred prior to the granting of voting rights to freed slaves.
- D. Ratification was the result of the accumulated efforts of women for decades.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The ratification of the 19th Amendment was the culmination of decades of advocacy and activism by women who fought tirelessly for their voting rights, making option D the most accurate statement. Option A incorrectly attributes the ratification solely to the Seneca Falls Convention, which was just one of many events in the long struggle for women's suffrage. Option B suggests a direct exchange of military service for voting rights, which oversimplifies the complex social and political factors involved. Option C misrepresents the timeline, as the 19th Amendment was ratified after the Civil War, but the fight for voting rights for freed slaves and women evolved concurrently, not sequentially.
The ratification of the 19th Amendment was the culmination of decades of advocacy and activism by women who fought tirelessly for their voting rights, making option D the most accurate statement. Option A incorrectly attributes the ratification solely to the Seneca Falls Convention, which was just one of many events in the long struggle for women's suffrage. Option B suggests a direct exchange of military service for voting rights, which oversimplifies the complex social and political factors involved. Option C misrepresents the timeline, as the 19th Amendment was ratified after the Civil War, but the fight for voting rights for freed slaves and women evolved concurrently, not sequentially.
Which statement from the excerpts provides evidence for the Inference that minority rights were not protected by the U.S. government as originally founded?
- A. "To the contrary, the government they devised was defective from the start, requiring several amendments, a civil war, and momentous social transformation to attain the system of constitutional government, and its respect for the individual freedoms and human rights, we hold as fundamental today."
- B. "In a very real sense, it was then, in 1787, that the Revolution truly began."
- C. "I do not believe that the meaning of the Constitution was forever 'fixed' at the Philadelphia Convention."
- D. "For it was with the writing of our Constitution, setting down the architecture of democratic government, that the noble sentiments and brave rhetoric of 1776 took on substance......"
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Option A highlights the inherent flaws in the original government structure, indicating that it required significant amendments and a civil war to address fundamental issues, including the protection of minority rights. This suggests that, from its inception, the government did not adequately safeguard these rights. Options B, C, and D, while relevant to the historical context, do not specifically address the inadequacies of minority rights protection. B focuses on the ongoing nature of the Revolution, C discusses the evolving interpretation of the Constitution, and D emphasizes the establishment of democratic principles without mentioning the lack of protections for minority rights.
Option A highlights the inherent flaws in the original government structure, indicating that it required significant amendments and a civil war to address fundamental issues, including the protection of minority rights. This suggests that, from its inception, the government did not adequately safeguard these rights. Options B, C, and D, while relevant to the historical context, do not specifically address the inadequacies of minority rights protection. B focuses on the ongoing nature of the Revolution, C discusses the evolving interpretation of the Constitution, and D emphasizes the establishment of democratic principles without mentioning the lack of protections for minority rights.