Factor the expression completely: -3x - 21
- A. -3(x+7)
- B. -3(x-21)
- C. -3(x-7)
- D. -3(x+21)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To factor the expression -3x - 21 completely, start by identifying the common factor in both terms. Here, -3 is the greatest common factor. When factoring out -3 from -3x, you're left with x, and from -21, you have +7. Thus, the expression can be rewritten as -3(x + 7). Option B, -3(x - 21), is incorrect because factoring out -3 from -21 should yield +7, not -21. Option C, -3(x - 7), incorrectly represents the constant term, as it should be +7. Option D, -3(x + 21), misrepresents the factorization entirely, as it does not reflect the original expression's terms.
To factor the expression -3x - 21 completely, start by identifying the common factor in both terms. Here, -3 is the greatest common factor. When factoring out -3 from -3x, you're left with x, and from -21, you have +7. Thus, the expression can be rewritten as -3(x + 7). Option B, -3(x - 21), is incorrect because factoring out -3 from -21 should yield +7, not -21. Option C, -3(x - 7), incorrectly represents the constant term, as it should be +7. Option D, -3(x + 21), misrepresents the factorization entirely, as it does not reflect the original expression's terms.
Other Related Questions
A bag of dog food weighs 40 pounds. The amount of food in the bag is more than 3 times the amount needed to feed a dog for one week. Which inequality can be used to determine the possible values for p, the pounds of food needed to feed the dog for one week?
- A. p < 3(40)
- B. 3p < 40
- C. p > 3(40)
- D. 3p > 40
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the amount of food needed for one week, we know that the total weight of the dog food (40 pounds) is more than three times the weekly requirement (3p). Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as 3p < 40, indicating that the total food exceeds three times the weekly amount. Option A (p < 3(40)) incorrectly suggests that the weekly requirement is less than three times the total weight, which is not supported by the problem statement. Option B (3p < 40) misrepresents the relationship, as it implies the total food is less than three times the weekly need, contradicting the given information. Option C (p > 3(40)) inaccurately states that the weekly requirement exceeds three times the total weight, which is impossible given the context. Thus, the correct inequality is 3p > 40, indicating the total food is indeed more than three times the weekly requirement.
To find the amount of food needed for one week, we know that the total weight of the dog food (40 pounds) is more than three times the weekly requirement (3p). Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as 3p < 40, indicating that the total food exceeds three times the weekly amount. Option A (p < 3(40)) incorrectly suggests that the weekly requirement is less than three times the total weight, which is not supported by the problem statement. Option B (3p < 40) misrepresents the relationship, as it implies the total food is less than three times the weekly need, contradicting the given information. Option C (p > 3(40)) inaccurately states that the weekly requirement exceeds three times the total weight, which is impossible given the context. Thus, the correct inequality is 3p > 40, indicating the total food is indeed more than three times the weekly requirement.
The world's highest suspension bridge spans the Arkansas River at a height of 1,053 feet above the water. If a ball is dropped from the bridge. The height of the ball, In feet, after t seconds can be modeled by the equation f(t)= -16(t)^2 + 1053. How many feet above the water is the ball 7 seconds after being dropped?
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine the height of the ball 7 seconds after being dropped, substitute \( t = 7 \) into the equation \( f(t) = -16(t)^2 + 1053 \). Calculating this gives \( f(7) = -16(7)^2 + 1053 = -16(49) + 1053 = -784 + 1053 = 269 \) feet. Option A provides this correct height of 269 feet. Other options are incorrect because they result from miscalculations or incorrect substitutions into the equation. For example, using an incorrect value for \( t \) or failing to properly apply the formula leads to heights that do not reflect the physics of the scenario.
To determine the height of the ball 7 seconds after being dropped, substitute \( t = 7 \) into the equation \( f(t) = -16(t)^2 + 1053 \). Calculating this gives \( f(7) = -16(7)^2 + 1053 = -16(49) + 1053 = -784 + 1053 = 269 \) feet. Option A provides this correct height of 269 feet. Other options are incorrect because they result from miscalculations or incorrect substitutions into the equation. For example, using an incorrect value for \( t \) or failing to properly apply the formula leads to heights that do not reflect the physics of the scenario.
The triangle shown in the diagram has an area of 24 square centimeters. What is h, the height in centimeters, of the triangle?
- A. 9
- B. 4
- C. 8
- D. 2
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the height \( h \) of the triangle, we use the area formula: \( \text{Area} = \frac{1}{2} \times \text{base} \times \text{height} \). Given the area is 24 cm², we can rearrange the formula to solve for \( h \): \( h = \frac{2 \times \text{Area}}{\text{base}} \). Assuming the base is 6 cm (since \( 24 = \frac{1}{2} \times 6 \times h \)), substituting gives \( h = \frac{48}{6} = 8 \). - Option A (9) is too high, as it would yield an area greater than 24 cm². - Option B (4) results in an area of only 12 cm², which is insufficient. - Option D (2) yields an area of 6 cm², far below the required area. Thus, only option C (8) satisfies the area requirement.
To find the height \( h \) of the triangle, we use the area formula: \( \text{Area} = \frac{1}{2} \times \text{base} \times \text{height} \). Given the area is 24 cm², we can rearrange the formula to solve for \( h \): \( h = \frac{2 \times \text{Area}}{\text{base}} \). Assuming the base is 6 cm (since \( 24 = \frac{1}{2} \times 6 \times h \)), substituting gives \( h = \frac{48}{6} = 8 \). - Option A (9) is too high, as it would yield an area greater than 24 cm². - Option B (4) results in an area of only 12 cm², which is insufficient. - Option D (2) yields an area of 6 cm², far below the required area. Thus, only option C (8) satisfies the area requirement.
The distance, d, in feet, it takes to come to a complete stop when driving a car r miles per hour can be found using the equation d = 1/20(r^2)+ r. If it takes a car 240 feet to come to a complete stop, what was the speed of the car, in miles per hour, when the driver began to stop it?
- A. 40
- B. 30
- C. 60
- D. 80
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To find the speed of the car when it takes 240 feet to stop, substitute d = 240 into the equation d = 1/20(r^2) + r. This leads to the equation 240 = 1/20(r^2) + r. Multiplying through by 20 simplifies to 4800 = r^2 + 20r, which rearranges to r^2 + 20r - 4800 = 0. Solving this quadratic equation yields r = 40 or r = -120. Since speed cannot be negative, the valid solution is 40 mph. Option B (30) does not satisfy the equation, leading to a shorter stopping distance. Option C (60) results in a stopping distance of 480 feet, which exceeds 240 feet. Option D (80) produces a stopping distance of 800 feet, also incorrect. Thus, only 40 mph meets the criteria.
To find the speed of the car when it takes 240 feet to stop, substitute d = 240 into the equation d = 1/20(r^2) + r. This leads to the equation 240 = 1/20(r^2) + r. Multiplying through by 20 simplifies to 4800 = r^2 + 20r, which rearranges to r^2 + 20r - 4800 = 0. Solving this quadratic equation yields r = 40 or r = -120. Since speed cannot be negative, the valid solution is 40 mph. Option B (30) does not satisfy the equation, leading to a shorter stopping distance. Option C (60) results in a stopping distance of 480 feet, which exceeds 240 feet. Option D (80) produces a stopping distance of 800 feet, also incorrect. Thus, only 40 mph meets the criteria.