Which of the following numbers is closest to 1?
- A. 4/5
- B. 5/4
- C. 5/6
- D. 6/5
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine which number is closest to 1, we can convert each option to decimal form: A: 4/5 = 0.8, which is 0.2 away from 1. B: 5/4 = 1.25, which is 0.25 away from 1. C: 5/6 ≈ 0.833, which is approximately 0.167 away from 1. D: 6/5 = 1.2, which is 0.2 away from 1. Among these, 5/6 is the closest to 1, as it has the smallest difference from 1 compared to the other options. The other fractions either exceed or fall short of 1 by a larger margin.
To determine which number is closest to 1, we can convert each option to decimal form: A: 4/5 = 0.8, which is 0.2 away from 1. B: 5/4 = 1.25, which is 0.25 away from 1. C: 5/6 ≈ 0.833, which is approximately 0.167 away from 1. D: 6/5 = 1.2, which is 0.2 away from 1. Among these, 5/6 is the closest to 1, as it has the smallest difference from 1 compared to the other options. The other fractions either exceed or fall short of 1 by a larger margin.
Other Related Questions
Alexia bought a book that is 252 pages long. She read the book in 3 days. The first day, she read 1/2 of the book's pages, the second day, she read 1/3 of the book's pages, and the third day she read all the remaining pages. How many pages did Alexia read the third day?
- A. 3200%
- B. 3600%
- C. 4000%
- D. 4200%
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine how many pages Alexia read on the third day, we first calculate the pages read on the first two days. On the first day, she read half of 252 pages, which is 126 pages. On the second day, she read one-third, totaling 84 pages. Adding these gives 210 pages read over the first two days. Thus, the remaining pages for the third day are 252 - 210 = 42 pages. Options A, B, and C do not relate to the total pages read, as they present percentages rather than the actual number of pages. The correct choice reflects the accurate calculation of pages read on the final day.
To determine how many pages Alexia read on the third day, we first calculate the pages read on the first two days. On the first day, she read half of 252 pages, which is 126 pages. On the second day, she read one-third, totaling 84 pages. Adding these gives 210 pages read over the first two days. Thus, the remaining pages for the third day are 252 - 210 = 42 pages. Options A, B, and C do not relate to the total pages read, as they present percentages rather than the actual number of pages. The correct choice reflects the accurate calculation of pages read on the final day.
Which of the following inequalities is correct?
- A. 2/3 < 3/5 < 5/7
- B. 2/3 < 5/7 < 3/5
- C. 3/5 < 2/3 < 5/7
- D. 3/5 < 5/7 < 2/3
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the order of the fractions, we can convert them to decimals or find a common denominator. - **Option A (2/3 < 3/5 < 5/7)** is incorrect because 2/3 (approximately 0.67) is greater than 3/5 (0.6), violating the first inequality. - **Option B (2/3 < 5/7 < 3/5)** is also incorrect, as 5/7 (approximately 0.71) is greater than 2/3, making the first inequality false. - **Option D (3/5 < 5/7 < 2/3)** is incorrect because, while 3/5 is less than 5/7, 5/7 is greater than 2/3, contradicting the second inequality. - **Option C (3/5 < 2/3 < 5/7)** is accurate; 3/5 is indeed less than 2/3, and 2/3 is less than 5/7, maintaining the correct order.
To determine the order of the fractions, we can convert them to decimals or find a common denominator. - **Option A (2/3 < 3/5 < 5/7)** is incorrect because 2/3 (approximately 0.67) is greater than 3/5 (0.6), violating the first inequality. - **Option B (2/3 < 5/7 < 3/5)** is also incorrect, as 5/7 (approximately 0.71) is greater than 2/3, making the first inequality false. - **Option D (3/5 < 5/7 < 2/3)** is incorrect because, while 3/5 is less than 5/7, 5/7 is greater than 2/3, contradicting the second inequality. - **Option C (3/5 < 2/3 < 5/7)** is accurate; 3/5 is indeed less than 2/3, and 2/3 is less than 5/7, maintaining the correct order.
Kayla has a stack of photographs that is 20 centimeters high. If each photograph is 0.04 cm thick, how many photos are there in the stack?
- A. 8
- B. 50
- C. 80
- D. 500
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the number of photographs in the stack, divide the total height of the stack by the thickness of each photograph. The stack is 20 cm high and each photograph is 0.04 cm thick. Calculating this gives: 20 cm ÷ 0.04 cm = 500 photographs. Option A (8) is incorrect as it underestimates the total by not accounting for the thickness appropriately. Option B (50) also miscalculates the total, suggesting a much smaller number of photographs. Option C (80) is an overestimation, failing to consider the correct division of height by thickness. Only option D (500) accurately reflects the calculation, confirming the total number of photographs in the stack.
To determine the number of photographs in the stack, divide the total height of the stack by the thickness of each photograph. The stack is 20 cm high and each photograph is 0.04 cm thick. Calculating this gives: 20 cm ÷ 0.04 cm = 500 photographs. Option A (8) is incorrect as it underestimates the total by not accounting for the thickness appropriately. Option B (50) also miscalculates the total, suggesting a much smaller number of photographs. Option C (80) is an overestimation, failing to consider the correct division of height by thickness. Only option D (500) accurately reflects the calculation, confirming the total number of photographs in the stack.
The large square above has sides of length 1. It is divided into smaller squares by dividing each side into 10 equal parts. In the figure, 3 full rows and 4 smaller squares in the next row are shaded. What is the area of the shaded region?
- A. 0.34
- B. 0.37
- C. 0.43
- D. 0.7
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine the area of the shaded region, first note that the large square has a side length of 1, resulting in a total area of 1 square unit. Each side is divided into 10 equal parts, creating a grid of 100 smaller squares, each with an area of 0.01 (1/100). In the figure, 3 full rows of squares are shaded, which accounts for 30 squares (3 rows x 10 squares per row). Additionally, 4 squares are shaded in the fourth row, bringing the total shaded squares to 34. Thus, the area of the shaded region is 34 squares x 0.01 = 0.34. Option B (0.37) incorrectly suggests 37 squares shaded. Option C (0.43) implies 43 squares, which is not possible given the shading described. Option D (0.7) overestimates the shaded area, miscounting the total squares shaded.
To determine the area of the shaded region, first note that the large square has a side length of 1, resulting in a total area of 1 square unit. Each side is divided into 10 equal parts, creating a grid of 100 smaller squares, each with an area of 0.01 (1/100). In the figure, 3 full rows of squares are shaded, which accounts for 30 squares (3 rows x 10 squares per row). Additionally, 4 squares are shaded in the fourth row, bringing the total shaded squares to 34. Thus, the area of the shaded region is 34 squares x 0.01 = 0.34. Option B (0.37) incorrectly suggests 37 squares shaded. Option C (0.43) implies 43 squares, which is not possible given the shading described. Option D (0.7) overestimates the shaded area, miscounting the total squares shaded.