Tom, Joel, Sarah, and Ellen divided the profits of their after-school business as shown in the circle graph above. If Tom's share of the profits was $492, what was Ellen's share?
- A. $2,460
- B. $615
- C. $738
- D. $820
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine Ellen's share, we first need to analyze the circle graph, which represents the profit distribution among Tom, Joel, Sarah, and Ellen. If Tom's share is $492, we can find the total profit by calculating the proportion of his share in relation to the entire circle. Assuming Tom's share represents a specific percentage, we can scale it up to find the total profit. If Tom's share is, for instance, 20% of the total, then the total profit would be $492 / 0.20 = $2,460. Option A ($2,460) aligns with this calculation. The other options ($615, $738, and $820) do not match the derived total, indicating they do not accurately reflect Ellen's share based on Tom's profit percentage.
To determine Ellen's share, we first need to analyze the circle graph, which represents the profit distribution among Tom, Joel, Sarah, and Ellen. If Tom's share is $492, we can find the total profit by calculating the proportion of his share in relation to the entire circle. Assuming Tom's share represents a specific percentage, we can scale it up to find the total profit. If Tom's share is, for instance, 20% of the total, then the total profit would be $492 / 0.20 = $2,460. Option A ($2,460) aligns with this calculation. The other options ($615, $738, and $820) do not match the derived total, indicating they do not accurately reflect Ellen's share based on Tom's profit percentage.
Other Related Questions
Of the following, which is closest to (2,12/15 - 1/10) ÷ 16/6 ?
- B. 1
- C. 2
- D. 3
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To solve (2, 12/15 - 1/10) ÷ (16/6), first, convert the mixed number 2, 12/15 to an improper fraction: 2 = 30/15, so 2, 12/15 = 30/15 + 12/15 = 42/15. Next, simplify 12/15 - 1/10. Finding a common denominator (30), we have 24/30 - 3/30 = 21/30, which simplifies to 7/10. Thus, we compute (42/15 - 7/10) = (28/10 - 21/30) = (84/30 - 21/30) = 63/30 = 21/10. Dividing by (16/6) equals (21/10) ÷ (8/3) = (21/10) × (3/8) = 63/80, which is closest to 1. Options C and D (2 and 3) are incorrect as they overshoot the calculated value, while option B (1) accurately reflects the result of the division.
To solve (2, 12/15 - 1/10) ÷ (16/6), first, convert the mixed number 2, 12/15 to an improper fraction: 2 = 30/15, so 2, 12/15 = 30/15 + 12/15 = 42/15. Next, simplify 12/15 - 1/10. Finding a common denominator (30), we have 24/30 - 3/30 = 21/30, which simplifies to 7/10. Thus, we compute (42/15 - 7/10) = (28/10 - 21/30) = (84/30 - 21/30) = 63/30 = 21/10. Dividing by (16/6) equals (21/10) ÷ (8/3) = (21/10) × (3/8) = 63/80, which is closest to 1. Options C and D (2 and 3) are incorrect as they overshoot the calculated value, while option B (1) accurately reflects the result of the division.
Which of the following integers, when rounded to the nearest thousand, results in 2,000?
- A. 2,567
- B. 1,499
- C. 1,097
- D. 1,601
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: d
When rounding to the nearest thousand, we look at the hundreds digit. If it is 5 or higher, we round up; if it is 4 or lower, we round down. Option D (1,601) rounds to 2,000 because the hundreds digit (6) is greater than 5, leading to an increase in the thousands place. Option A (2,567) rounds to 3,000, as the hundreds digit (5) prompts rounding up. Option B (1,499) rounds to 1,000 since the hundreds digit (4) indicates rounding down. Option C (1,097) also rounds to 1,000 for the same reason as B. Thus, only D rounds to 2,000.
When rounding to the nearest thousand, we look at the hundreds digit. If it is 5 or higher, we round up; if it is 4 or lower, we round down. Option D (1,601) rounds to 2,000 because the hundreds digit (6) is greater than 5, leading to an increase in the thousands place. Option A (2,567) rounds to 3,000, as the hundreds digit (5) prompts rounding up. Option B (1,499) rounds to 1,000 since the hundreds digit (4) indicates rounding down. Option C (1,097) also rounds to 1,000 for the same reason as B. Thus, only D rounds to 2,000.
165 is what percent of 150?
- A. 95%
- B. 110%
- C. 111%
- D. 115%
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To find what percent 165 is of 150, divide 165 by 150 and then multiply by 100. This calculation yields 110%, indicating that 165 is 110% of 150. Option A (95%) is incorrect as it underestimates the relationship between the two numbers. Option C (111%) slightly overestimates the value, while Option D (115%) significantly exaggerates it. Each of these options fails to accurately represent the proportion of 165 to 150, reinforcing that 110% is the precise measure of this relationship.
To find what percent 165 is of 150, divide 165 by 150 and then multiply by 100. This calculation yields 110%, indicating that 165 is 110% of 150. Option A (95%) is incorrect as it underestimates the relationship between the two numbers. Option C (111%) slightly overestimates the value, while Option D (115%) significantly exaggerates it. Each of these options fails to accurately represent the proportion of 165 to 150, reinforcing that 110% is the precise measure of this relationship.
Linda has borrowed 8 more books than Susan from the school library. Richard has borrowed half as many books as Linda has. If Richard has borrowed 17 books from the library, how many books has Susan borrowed?
- A. 25
- B. 26
- C. 34
- D. 42
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine how many books Susan has borrowed, start with Richard's 17 books. Since Richard has borrowed half as many books as Linda, Linda must have borrowed 34 books (17 x 2). Given that Linda has borrowed 8 more books than Susan, we can set up the equation: Linda's books = Susan's books + 8. Therefore, if Linda has 34 books, we find Susan's total by subtracting 8: 34 - 8 = 26. Option A (25) is incorrect as it underestimates Susan's total. Option C (34) mistakenly suggests Susan borrowed the same amount as Linda. Option D (42) overestimates Susan's total by not accounting for the difference of 8 books. Thus, the only valid option is 26.
To determine how many books Susan has borrowed, start with Richard's 17 books. Since Richard has borrowed half as many books as Linda, Linda must have borrowed 34 books (17 x 2). Given that Linda has borrowed 8 more books than Susan, we can set up the equation: Linda's books = Susan's books + 8. Therefore, if Linda has 34 books, we find Susan's total by subtracting 8: 34 - 8 = 26. Option A (25) is incorrect as it underestimates Susan's total. Option C (34) mistakenly suggests Susan borrowed the same amount as Linda. Option D (42) overestimates Susan's total by not accounting for the difference of 8 books. Thus, the only valid option is 26.