(1) New York City has a long history with bicycle lanes, which are either painted on a street or constructed alongside a street and are used by bicycles rather than cars. (2) Its first bike lane — and the country's first — was built in 1894, along Brooklyn's Ocean Parkway. (3) Interest in bicycle lanes reappeared in the 1970s, and by 1980, Mayor Ed Koch saw to the construction of them on Sixth and Seventh Avenues in Midtown. (4) However, those lanes faced such fierce opposition that they were immediately removed. (5) Things have recently changed: since 2006, the city has taken bike lanes to a whole new level. (6) It installed more than 250 miles around the city's five boroughs. (7) Many New Yorkers complained the new bike lanes slowed car traffic and reduced the number of parking spaces. (8) Others complained bicyclists were not following traffic rules in the lanes. (9) In Williamsburg, Brooklyn, religious leaders convinced the city to remove a new strip of freshly painted bike lane in their neighborhood. (10) Elected officials and perturbed residents of Staten Island also pressured the city into removing its own 2.35-mile dedicated lane. (11) Most New Yorkers have gotten used to the idea: a recent poll of New York City residents shows that two-thirds of them support the bike lanes. (12) They cite environmental reasons for their support, as well as the health and safety benefits the lanes provide bike riders. (13) Ultimately, the city can be happy knowing that statistics have shown its new bike lanes have already made the streets of New York safer for bikers and pedestrians.
Where in the passage should the following sentence be inserted? Other New Yorkers say they are in favor of the bike lanes just for keeping bicyclists off the sidewalks.
- A. After sentence 1
- B. After sentence 3
- C. After sentence 9
- D. After sentence 12
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Inserting the sentence after sentence 12 effectively captures the contrasting viewpoints on bike lanes, highlighting public support while addressing concerns about sidewalk safety. This placement enhances the flow of the passage by concluding the discussion on community opinions regarding bike lanes. Option A, after sentence 1, disrupts the introduction of the topic, as it introduces a specific opinion too early. Option B, after sentence 3, fails to provide context for the differing opinions, leading to confusion. Option C, after sentence 9, does not align with the passage's progression, as it occurs before a more comprehensive discussion of the implications of bike lanes.
Inserting the sentence after sentence 12 effectively captures the contrasting viewpoints on bike lanes, highlighting public support while addressing concerns about sidewalk safety. This placement enhances the flow of the passage by concluding the discussion on community opinions regarding bike lanes. Option A, after sentence 1, disrupts the introduction of the topic, as it introduces a specific opinion too early. Option B, after sentence 3, fails to provide context for the differing opinions, leading to confusion. Option C, after sentence 9, does not align with the passage's progression, as it occurs before a more comprehensive discussion of the implications of bike lanes.
Other Related Questions
In context, which sentence would be best to insert at the beginning of the second paragraph (sentences 7–10)?
- A. Acceptance of the city's new bike lanes did not come immediately.
- B. The new bike lanes served numerous purposes for New Yorkers.
- C. In 2006, the majority of New York City residents did not own bicycles.
- D. Many pedestrians and motorists supported bicycle riding on city streets.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Option A effectively sets the stage for the discussion in the second paragraph by highlighting the initial resistance to the bike lanes, which is crucial for understanding the subsequent developments and changes in public perception. Option B, while relevant, lacks a specific focus on the acceptance timeline, making it less suitable for a smooth transition. Option C introduces a fact that, although interesting, does not directly relate to the acceptance of the bike lanes and could distract from the main narrative. Option D mentions support for bicycle riding but does not address the acceptance of the bike lanes specifically, making it less relevant to the context.
Option A effectively sets the stage for the discussion in the second paragraph by highlighting the initial resistance to the bike lanes, which is crucial for understanding the subsequent developments and changes in public perception. Option B, while relevant, lacks a specific focus on the acceptance timeline, making it less suitable for a smooth transition. Option C introduces a fact that, although interesting, does not directly relate to the acceptance of the bike lanes and could distract from the main narrative. Option D mentions support for bicycle riding but does not address the acceptance of the bike lanes specifically, making it less relevant to the context.
Unlike Passage 2, Passage 1 makes use of:
- A. Scientific observation
- B. Historical allusion
- C. Personal anecdote
- D. Logical reasoning
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Passage 1 effectively employs personal anecdotes, allowing readers to connect emotionally with the author's experiences, which enhances engagement and relatability. In contrast, Passage 2 lacks this personal touch. Option A, scientific observation, is not present in either passage, as both focus on narrative rather than empirical data. Option B, historical allusion, may be found in Passage 2, but it is absent in Passage 1. Option D, logical reasoning, is utilized in both passages, but Passage 1 stands out for its personal storytelling approach, making it distinct in its method of conveying ideas.
Passage 1 effectively employs personal anecdotes, allowing readers to connect emotionally with the author's experiences, which enhances engagement and relatability. In contrast, Passage 2 lacks this personal touch. Option A, scientific observation, is not present in either passage, as both focus on narrative rather than empirical data. Option B, historical allusion, may be found in Passage 2, but it is absent in Passage 1. Option D, logical reasoning, is utilized in both passages, but Passage 1 stands out for its personal storytelling approach, making it distinct in its method of conveying ideas.
The passage is an example of which rhetorical strategy?
- A. Claim–evidence
- B. Compare–contrast
- C. Quotation–analysis
- D. Definition–example
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The passage employs a definition followed by an example, illustrating concepts clearly. This strategy effectively clarifies ideas by providing context through real-world applications, enhancing understanding. Option A, claim-evidence, focuses on supporting assertions with data, which is not the primary approach here. Option B, compare-contrast, would involve analyzing similarities and differences, which is absent in the text. Option C, quotation-analysis, centers on interpreting cited material, whereas the passage defines terms directly rather than quoting sources. Thus, the use of definition and example stands out as the dominant rhetorical strategy.
The passage employs a definition followed by an example, illustrating concepts clearly. This strategy effectively clarifies ideas by providing context through real-world applications, enhancing understanding. Option A, claim-evidence, focuses on supporting assertions with data, which is not the primary approach here. Option B, compare-contrast, would involve analyzing similarities and differences, which is absent in the text. Option C, quotation-analysis, centers on interpreting cited material, whereas the passage defines terms directly rather than quoting sources. Thus, the use of definition and example stands out as the dominant rhetorical strategy.
Which choice most effectively combines sentences 7 and 8 (reproduced below) at the underlined portion? Another panel depicted icicles forming on the breath of a mule and a man with a sack of frozen meal. The unusual weather on February 10, 1895, when temperatures fell below zero in Georgia.
- A. meal, highlighting the unusual weather
- B. meal, by the weather that was unusual
- C. meal, that the weather was unusual
- D. meal, when the unusual weather
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Option A effectively combines the sentences by using "highlighting," which clearly indicates that the icicles and frozen meal illustrate the unusual weather conditions. This maintains a strong connection between the imagery and the context of the weather event. Option B introduces "by the weather that was unusual," which is awkward and less direct, weakening the connection between the two ideas. Option C's phrasing, "that the weather was unusual," is vague and does not create a clear link between the images and the weather conditions. Option D, while somewhat effective, lacks the clarity of A, as "when the unusual weather" does not emphasize how the images relate to the weather event.
Option A effectively combines the sentences by using "highlighting," which clearly indicates that the icicles and frozen meal illustrate the unusual weather conditions. This maintains a strong connection between the imagery and the context of the weather event. Option B introduces "by the weather that was unusual," which is awkward and less direct, weakening the connection between the two ideas. Option C's phrasing, "that the weather was unusual," is vague and does not create a clear link between the images and the weather conditions. Option D, while somewhat effective, lacks the clarity of A, as "when the unusual weather" does not emphasize how the images relate to the weather event.