The class is divided into four groups of five students, and each student in the group is assigned a number from one through five. All the "ones" are given a topic of research, the "twos" another topic, and so on. Students work with peers who are assigned the same topic to take notes. After a period of researching with their peers, the original groups come together and students take turns teaching other members of their group about their assigned topic.
The collaboration activity is known as
- A. think-pair-share
- B. literature circles
- C. fishbowl discussion
- D. jigsaw strategy
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The jigsaw strategy effectively promotes collaboration by dividing a topic into sections, allowing each student to become an "expert" on their part and then share their knowledge with peers. This method encourages active participation and fosters a sense of responsibility among students. Think-pair-share (A) involves individual reflection followed by partner discussion, but lacks the comprehensive teamwork aspect. Literature circles (B) focus on reading comprehension in small groups, while fishbowl discussions (C) emphasize observation and participation but do not require the same level of collaborative learning as jigsaw. Each of these methods has its merits, but none match the collaborative depth of the jigsaw strategy.
The jigsaw strategy effectively promotes collaboration by dividing a topic into sections, allowing each student to become an "expert" on their part and then share their knowledge with peers. This method encourages active participation and fosters a sense of responsibility among students. Think-pair-share (A) involves individual reflection followed by partner discussion, but lacks the comprehensive teamwork aspect. Literature circles (B) focus on reading comprehension in small groups, while fishbowl discussions (C) emphasize observation and participation but do not require the same level of collaborative learning as jigsaw. Each of these methods has its merits, but none match the collaborative depth of the jigsaw strategy.
Other Related Questions
Active listening skills are best demonstrated by
- A. offering thoughtful feedback on someone's idea
- B. maintaining a neutral facial expression
- C. adding to a point by eagerly interjecting
- D. thinking of what to say next while in a discussion
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Active listening skills are best demonstrated by offering thoughtful feedback on someone's idea. This shows engagement and understanding, as it indicates that the listener has processed the information and is contributing meaningfully to the conversation. Maintaining a neutral facial expression (B) does not demonstrate engagement; it may signal disinterest or detachment. Adding to a point by eagerly interjecting (C) disrupts the flow of conversation and indicates a lack of patience for the speaker's full expression. Thinking of what to say next while in a discussion (D) distracts from truly listening, as it shifts focus away from the speaker. Effective active listening requires full attention and interaction.
Active listening skills are best demonstrated by offering thoughtful feedback on someone's idea. This shows engagement and understanding, as it indicates that the listener has processed the information and is contributing meaningfully to the conversation. Maintaining a neutral facial expression (B) does not demonstrate engagement; it may signal disinterest or detachment. Adding to a point by eagerly interjecting (C) disrupts the flow of conversation and indicates a lack of patience for the speaker's full expression. Thinking of what to say next while in a discussion (D) distracts from truly listening, as it shifts focus away from the speaker. Effective active listening requires full attention and interaction.
The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and to raise twice the amount of money as they did last year. Which of the following revisions successfully corrects the sentence?
- A. The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and that they would raise twice the amount of money as they did last year.
- B. The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and raising twice the amount of money as they did last year.
- C. The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and, consequently, to raise twice the amount of money as they did last year.
- D. The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend; that the keynote speaker would be well received; and to raise twice the amount of money as they did last year.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Option A effectively maintains parallel structure by ensuring all elements in the list follow the same grammatical form: "that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and that they would raise twice the amount of money." This consistency enhances clarity and coherence. Option B disrupts parallelism by changing "to raise" to "raising," which creates a grammatical inconsistency in the series. Option C introduces "consequently," which unnecessarily complicates the sentence and breaks the parallel structure. Option D uses semicolons incorrectly, as they should separate independent clauses, not items in a list, leading to confusion.
Option A effectively maintains parallel structure by ensuring all elements in the list follow the same grammatical form: "that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and that they would raise twice the amount of money." This consistency enhances clarity and coherence. Option B disrupts parallelism by changing "to raise" to "raising," which creates a grammatical inconsistency in the series. Option C introduces "consequently," which unnecessarily complicates the sentence and breaks the parallel structure. Option D uses semicolons incorrectly, as they should separate independent clauses, not items in a list, leading to confusion.
Which of the following statements is true?
- A. In sentence 1, the word "knew" is functioning as an adverb.
- B. In sentence 1, the word "knew" is functioning as a verb.
- C. In sentence 3, the word "really" is functioning as an adjective.
- D. In sentence 3, the word "really" is functioning as a noun.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
In sentence 1, "knew" serves as a verb, indicating an action or state of being related to knowledge. This aligns with its grammatical role as a past tense verb, which expresses what someone understood or was aware of. Option A is incorrect as "knew" cannot function as an adverb; adverbs modify verbs, adjectives, or other adverbs, not serve as the main verb in a sentence. Option C misinterprets "really," which typically acts as an adverb to modify verbs or adjectives, not as an adjective itself. Option D is also incorrect since "really" does not function as a noun; it does not represent a person, place, thing, or idea.
In sentence 1, "knew" serves as a verb, indicating an action or state of being related to knowledge. This aligns with its grammatical role as a past tense verb, which expresses what someone understood or was aware of. Option A is incorrect as "knew" cannot function as an adverb; adverbs modify verbs, adjectives, or other adverbs, not serve as the main verb in a sentence. Option C misinterprets "really," which typically acts as an adverb to modify verbs or adjectives, not as an adjective itself. Option D is also incorrect since "really" does not function as a noun; it does not represent a person, place, thing, or idea.
How does the author organize information in the second paragraph?
- A. By explaining the difference between two approaches to satellites
- B. By explaining the process of how a satellite stops working
- C. By discussing a problem with satellites and a solution
- D. By discussing a series of events involving satellites
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
The author organizes information in the second paragraph by explaining the difference between two approaches to satellites, highlighting the contrasting methods and their implications. This structure allows readers to understand the nuances between the approaches clearly. Option B is incorrect as it focuses on the process of satellite failure, which is not the main theme. Option C misinterprets the content; while problems and solutions may be mentioned, the primary organization is not centered around this framework. Option D suggests a chronological sequence, but the paragraph does not follow a series of events; rather, it emphasizes comparative analysis.
The author organizes information in the second paragraph by explaining the difference between two approaches to satellites, highlighting the contrasting methods and their implications. This structure allows readers to understand the nuances between the approaches clearly. Option B is incorrect as it focuses on the process of satellite failure, which is not the main theme. Option C misinterprets the content; while problems and solutions may be mentioned, the primary organization is not centered around this framework. Option D suggests a chronological sequence, but the paragraph does not follow a series of events; rather, it emphasizes comparative analysis.