Of the following, which is closest to 17/6 + 6/17 ?
- A. 1
- B. 2
- C. 3
- D. 23
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To solve 17/6 + 6/17, we first find a common denominator, which is 102. Rewriting the fractions gives us (17*17)/(6*17) + (6*6)/(17*6) = 289/102 + 36/102 = 325/102. Dividing 325 by 102 yields approximately 3.19, which is closest to 3. Option A (1) is too low, as it does not account for the combined value of the fractions. Option B (2) is still below the calculated sum. Option D (23) is excessively high and not feasible given the values involved. Thus, option C (3) is the most accurate approximation.
To solve 17/6 + 6/17, we first find a common denominator, which is 102. Rewriting the fractions gives us (17*17)/(6*17) + (6*6)/(17*6) = 289/102 + 36/102 = 325/102. Dividing 325 by 102 yields approximately 3.19, which is closest to 3. Option A (1) is too low, as it does not account for the combined value of the fractions. Option B (2) is still below the calculated sum. Option D (23) is excessively high and not feasible given the values involved. Thus, option C (3) is the most accurate approximation.
Other Related Questions
Fred worked 39.5 hours last week. Alice worked 6.75 fewer hours than Fred. How many hours did Alice work?
- A. 33.75 HOURS
- B. 33.25 HOURS
- C. 33.35 HOURS
- D. 33.85 HOURS
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine how many hours Alice worked, subtract the hours she worked less than Fred from Fred's total. Fred worked 39.5 hours, and Alice worked 6.75 hours fewer. Calculating this: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. However, this calculation is incorrect. The correct calculation should be: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. This means option A (33.75 hours) is incorrect. Option B (33.25 hours), C (33.35 hours), and D (33.85 hours) also do not match the correct calculation. Thus, none of the options are correct based on the provided data.
To determine how many hours Alice worked, subtract the hours she worked less than Fred from Fred's total. Fred worked 39.5 hours, and Alice worked 6.75 hours fewer. Calculating this: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. However, this calculation is incorrect. The correct calculation should be: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. This means option A (33.75 hours) is incorrect. Option B (33.25 hours), C (33.35 hours), and D (33.85 hours) also do not match the correct calculation. Thus, none of the options are correct based on the provided data.
If 22,1/3% of a number n is 938, then n must be?
- A. 281,400
- B. 42,000
- C. 4,960
- D. 4,200
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the number \( n \), we start by converting \( 22 \frac{1}{3} \% \) to a decimal. This percentage equals \( \frac{67}{3} \% \), or \( \frac{67}{300} \) in decimal form. Setting up the equation \( \frac{67}{300} n = 938 \) allows us to solve for \( n \). Multiplying both sides by \( \frac{300}{67} \) gives \( n = 938 \times \frac{300}{67} = 4,200 \). Option A (281,400) is too high, as it would imply a much larger percentage. Option B (42,000) miscalculates the percentage relation. Option C (4,960) is incorrect, as it does not satisfy the equation derived from the percentage calculation.
To find the number \( n \), we start by converting \( 22 \frac{1}{3} \% \) to a decimal. This percentage equals \( \frac{67}{3} \% \), or \( \frac{67}{300} \) in decimal form. Setting up the equation \( \frac{67}{300} n = 938 \) allows us to solve for \( n \). Multiplying both sides by \( \frac{300}{67} \) gives \( n = 938 \times \frac{300}{67} = 4,200 \). Option A (281,400) is too high, as it would imply a much larger percentage. Option B (42,000) miscalculates the percentage relation. Option C (4,960) is incorrect, as it does not satisfy the equation derived from the percentage calculation.
2 + (2 × 2) + 2 =
- A. 8
- B. 10
- C. 12
- D. 16
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To solve the expression 2 + (2 × 2) + 2, it’s essential to follow the order of operations, often remembered by the acronym PEMDAS (Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, Addition and Subtraction). First, calculate the value inside the parentheses: 2 × 2 equals 4. Next, substitute this back into the expression: 2 + 4 + 2. Then, perform the addition from left to right: 2 + 4 equals 6, and then 6 + 2 equals 8. Options B (10), C (12), and D (16) are incorrect because they do not adhere to the proper order of operations or miscalculate the addition steps.
To solve the expression 2 + (2 × 2) + 2, it’s essential to follow the order of operations, often remembered by the acronym PEMDAS (Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, Addition and Subtraction). First, calculate the value inside the parentheses: 2 × 2 equals 4. Next, substitute this back into the expression: 2 + 4 + 2. Then, perform the addition from left to right: 2 + 4 equals 6, and then 6 + 2 equals 8. Options B (10), C (12), and D (16) are incorrect because they do not adhere to the proper order of operations or miscalculate the addition steps.
If a number rounded to the nearest hundredth is 9.99, which of the following could be the number?
- A. 9.845
- B. 9.983
- C. 9.992
- D. 9.998
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Rounding to the nearest hundredth means looking at the third decimal place to determine if the second decimal place should round up or stay the same. For a number rounded to 9.99, the possible range is 9.985 to 9.995. Option A (9.845) rounds to 9.84, which is outside the range. Option B (9.983) rounds to 9.98, also outside the range. Option D (9.998) rounds to 10.00, exceeding the upper limit. Option C (9.992) falls within the range and correctly rounds to 9.99, making it the only viable option.
Rounding to the nearest hundredth means looking at the third decimal place to determine if the second decimal place should round up or stay the same. For a number rounded to 9.99, the possible range is 9.985 to 9.995. Option A (9.845) rounds to 9.84, which is outside the range. Option B (9.983) rounds to 9.98, also outside the range. Option D (9.998) rounds to 10.00, exceeding the upper limit. Option C (9.992) falls within the range and correctly rounds to 9.99, making it the only viable option.