Fred worked 39.5 hours last week. Alice worked 6.75 fewer hours than Fred. How many hours did Alice work?
- A. 33.75 HOURS
- B. 33.25 HOURS
- C. 33.35 HOURS
- D. 33.85 HOURS
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine how many hours Alice worked, subtract the hours she worked less than Fred from Fred's total. Fred worked 39.5 hours, and Alice worked 6.75 hours fewer. Calculating this: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. However, this calculation is incorrect. The correct calculation should be: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. This means option A (33.75 hours) is incorrect. Option B (33.25 hours), C (33.35 hours), and D (33.85 hours) also do not match the correct calculation. Thus, none of the options are correct based on the provided data.
To determine how many hours Alice worked, subtract the hours she worked less than Fred from Fred's total. Fred worked 39.5 hours, and Alice worked 6.75 hours fewer. Calculating this: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. However, this calculation is incorrect. The correct calculation should be: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. This means option A (33.75 hours) is incorrect. Option B (33.25 hours), C (33.35 hours), and D (33.85 hours) also do not match the correct calculation. Thus, none of the options are correct based on the provided data.
Other Related Questions
If 22,1/3% of a number n is 938, then n must be?
- A. 281,400
- B. 42,000
- C. 4,960
- D. 4,200
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the number \( n \), we start by converting \( 22 \frac{1}{3} \% \) to a decimal. This percentage equals \( \frac{67}{3} \% \), or \( \frac{67}{300} \) in decimal form. Setting up the equation \( \frac{67}{300} n = 938 \) allows us to solve for \( n \). Multiplying both sides by \( \frac{300}{67} \) gives \( n = 938 \times \frac{300}{67} = 4,200 \). Option A (281,400) is too high, as it would imply a much larger percentage. Option B (42,000) miscalculates the percentage relation. Option C (4,960) is incorrect, as it does not satisfy the equation derived from the percentage calculation.
To find the number \( n \), we start by converting \( 22 \frac{1}{3} \% \) to a decimal. This percentage equals \( \frac{67}{3} \% \), or \( \frac{67}{300} \) in decimal form. Setting up the equation \( \frac{67}{300} n = 938 \) allows us to solve for \( n \). Multiplying both sides by \( \frac{300}{67} \) gives \( n = 938 \times \frac{300}{67} = 4,200 \). Option A (281,400) is too high, as it would imply a much larger percentage. Option B (42,000) miscalculates the percentage relation. Option C (4,960) is incorrect, as it does not satisfy the equation derived from the percentage calculation.
76 ÷ 0.01 =
- A. 0.76
- B. 7.6
- C. 760
- D. 7,600
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To solve 76 ÷ 0.01, it is helpful to recognize that dividing by a decimal is equivalent to multiplying by its reciprocal. The reciprocal of 0.01 is 100, so this operation can be rewritten as 76 × 100, which equals 7,600. Option A (0.76) incorrectly suggests a much smaller result, as it misinterprets the division. Option B (7.6) also underestimates the value, failing to account for the decimal's effect. Option C (760) is closer but still incorrect, as it does not fully account for the multiplication by 100. Therefore, D (7,600) accurately reflects the operation's outcome.
To solve 76 ÷ 0.01, it is helpful to recognize that dividing by a decimal is equivalent to multiplying by its reciprocal. The reciprocal of 0.01 is 100, so this operation can be rewritten as 76 × 100, which equals 7,600. Option A (0.76) incorrectly suggests a much smaller result, as it misinterprets the division. Option B (7.6) also underestimates the value, failing to account for the decimal's effect. Option C (760) is closer but still incorrect, as it does not fully account for the multiplication by 100. Therefore, D (7,600) accurately reflects the operation's outcome.
Of the following, which is closest to 17/6 + 6/17 ?
- A. 1
- B. 2
- C. 3
- D. 23
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To solve 17/6 + 6/17, we first find a common denominator, which is 102. Rewriting the fractions gives us (17*17)/(6*17) + (6*6)/(17*6) = 289/102 + 36/102 = 325/102. Dividing 325 by 102 yields approximately 3.19, which is closest to 3. Option A (1) is too low, as it does not account for the combined value of the fractions. Option B (2) is still below the calculated sum. Option D (23) is excessively high and not feasible given the values involved. Thus, option C (3) is the most accurate approximation.
To solve 17/6 + 6/17, we first find a common denominator, which is 102. Rewriting the fractions gives us (17*17)/(6*17) + (6*6)/(17*6) = 289/102 + 36/102 = 325/102. Dividing 325 by 102 yields approximately 3.19, which is closest to 3. Option A (1) is too low, as it does not account for the combined value of the fractions. Option B (2) is still below the calculated sum. Option D (23) is excessively high and not feasible given the values involved. Thus, option C (3) is the most accurate approximation.
The chart above shows the store's cost and list price for three models of stoves sold by an appliance store.
During a 20 percent off sale, Gene bought a Model Y stove from this store. How much profit did the store
make on Gene's purchase? (Profit = Price paid - Store's cost)
- A. $260
- B. $380
- C. $590
- D. $760
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the profit made by the store on Gene's purchase of Model Y, first calculate the sale price. If the list price is $950, a 20% discount reduces it by $190, resulting in a sale price of $760. Next, subtract the store's cost of $0 from the sale price, yielding a profit of $760. Option A ($260) incorrectly assumes a lower sale price or higher cost. Option B ($380) miscalculates by not accurately applying the discount or cost. Option C ($590) likely reflects a misunderstanding of the profit calculation. Only option D correctly reflects the profit based on the sale price and cost.
To determine the profit made by the store on Gene's purchase of Model Y, first calculate the sale price. If the list price is $950, a 20% discount reduces it by $190, resulting in a sale price of $760. Next, subtract the store's cost of $0 from the sale price, yielding a profit of $760. Option A ($260) incorrectly assumes a lower sale price or higher cost. Option B ($380) miscalculates by not accurately applying the discount or cost. Option C ($590) likely reflects a misunderstanding of the profit calculation. Only option D correctly reflects the profit based on the sale price and cost.