Fred worked 39.5 hours last week. Alice worked 6.75 fewer hours than Fred. How many hours did Alice work?
- A. 33.75 HOURS
- B. 33.25 HOURS
- C. 33.35 HOURS
- D. 33.85 HOURS
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine how many hours Alice worked, subtract the hours she worked less than Fred from Fred's total. Fred worked 39.5 hours, and Alice worked 6.75 hours fewer. Calculating this: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. However, this calculation is incorrect. The correct calculation should be: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. This means option A (33.75 hours) is incorrect. Option B (33.25 hours), C (33.35 hours), and D (33.85 hours) also do not match the correct calculation. Thus, none of the options are correct based on the provided data.
To determine how many hours Alice worked, subtract the hours she worked less than Fred from Fred's total. Fred worked 39.5 hours, and Alice worked 6.75 hours fewer. Calculating this: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. However, this calculation is incorrect. The correct calculation should be: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. This means option A (33.75 hours) is incorrect. Option B (33.25 hours), C (33.35 hours), and D (33.85 hours) also do not match the correct calculation. Thus, none of the options are correct based on the provided data.
Other Related Questions
If 4 is x percent of 16, what is x?
- A. 1/4
- B. 4
- C. 16
- D. 25
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find x, we start with the equation \(4 = \frac{x}{100} \times 16\). Rearranging this gives \(x = \frac{4 \times 100}{16}\), which simplifies to \(x = 25\). Option A (1/4) is incorrect as it does not represent a percentage of 16. Option B (4) misinterprets the relationship, as it does not reflect the percentage context. Option C (16) suggests that 4 is 16% of itself, which is also incorrect. Only option D (25) accurately represents that 4 is 25% of 16, confirming the correct calculation.
To find x, we start with the equation \(4 = \frac{x}{100} \times 16\). Rearranging this gives \(x = \frac{4 \times 100}{16}\), which simplifies to \(x = 25\). Option A (1/4) is incorrect as it does not represent a percentage of 16. Option B (4) misinterprets the relationship, as it does not reflect the percentage context. Option C (16) suggests that 4 is 16% of itself, which is also incorrect. Only option D (25) accurately represents that 4 is 25% of 16, confirming the correct calculation.
If a number rounded to the nearest hundredth is 9.99, which of the following could be the number?
- A. 9.845
- B. 9.983
- C. 9.992
- D. 9.998
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Rounding to the nearest hundredth means looking at the third decimal place to determine if the second decimal place should round up or stay the same. For a number rounded to 9.99, the possible range is 9.985 to 9.995. Option A (9.845) rounds to 9.84, which is outside the range. Option B (9.983) rounds to 9.98, also outside the range. Option D (9.998) rounds to 10.00, exceeding the upper limit. Option C (9.992) falls within the range and correctly rounds to 9.99, making it the only viable option.
Rounding to the nearest hundredth means looking at the third decimal place to determine if the second decimal place should round up or stay the same. For a number rounded to 9.99, the possible range is 9.985 to 9.995. Option A (9.845) rounds to 9.84, which is outside the range. Option B (9.983) rounds to 9.98, also outside the range. Option D (9.998) rounds to 10.00, exceeding the upper limit. Option C (9.992) falls within the range and correctly rounds to 9.99, making it the only viable option.
If 22,1/3% of a number n is 938, then n must be?
- A. 281,400
- B. 42,000
- C. 4,960
- D. 4,200
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the number \( n \), we start by converting \( 22 \frac{1}{3} \% \) to a decimal. This percentage equals \( \frac{67}{3} \% \), or \( \frac{67}{300} \) in decimal form. Setting up the equation \( \frac{67}{300} n = 938 \) allows us to solve for \( n \). Multiplying both sides by \( \frac{300}{67} \) gives \( n = 938 \times \frac{300}{67} = 4,200 \). Option A (281,400) is too high, as it would imply a much larger percentage. Option B (42,000) miscalculates the percentage relation. Option C (4,960) is incorrect, as it does not satisfy the equation derived from the percentage calculation.
To find the number \( n \), we start by converting \( 22 \frac{1}{3} \% \) to a decimal. This percentage equals \( \frac{67}{3} \% \), or \( \frac{67}{300} \) in decimal form. Setting up the equation \( \frac{67}{300} n = 938 \) allows us to solve for \( n \). Multiplying both sides by \( \frac{300}{67} \) gives \( n = 938 \times \frac{300}{67} = 4,200 \). Option A (281,400) is too high, as it would imply a much larger percentage. Option B (42,000) miscalculates the percentage relation. Option C (4,960) is incorrect, as it does not satisfy the equation derived from the percentage calculation.
If 32% of n is 20.8, what is n?
- A. 64
- B. 65
- C. 66
- D. 154
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To find \( n \), we start with the equation \( 0.32n = 20.8 \). By dividing both sides by 0.32, we calculate \( n = \frac{20.8}{0.32} \), which simplifies to 65. Option A (64) is incorrect; it underestimates \( n \) by miscalculating the percentage. Option C (66) slightly overestimates \( n \), failing to accurately reflect the relationship between the percentage and the total. Option D (154) is far too high, indicating a misunderstanding of the percentage calculation. Thus, 65 is the only value that satisfies the equation.
To find \( n \), we start with the equation \( 0.32n = 20.8 \). By dividing both sides by 0.32, we calculate \( n = \frac{20.8}{0.32} \), which simplifies to 65. Option A (64) is incorrect; it underestimates \( n \) by miscalculating the percentage. Option C (66) slightly overestimates \( n \), failing to accurately reflect the relationship between the percentage and the total. Option D (154) is far too high, indicating a misunderstanding of the percentage calculation. Thus, 65 is the only value that satisfies the equation.