The following accounts of a sporting event were written by two different authors. Account 1: On Tuesday, the amazing Wildcats triumphed over the lowly Hawks with a hard-won victory. While the helpless Hawks fought valiantly throughout the game, their offense could not compete with the Wildcats' powerhouse defense, ultimately giving the Wildcats a 37-14 win. Account 2: The Wildcats played unfairly throughout the game, which led to their undeserved victory over the Hawks on Tuesday night. The Wildcats' defense would have incurred many penalties had the referees noticed their tactics. Luck, rather than skill, gave them a lopsided win they did not deserve.
In evaluating the differences between the two accounts, a reader can infer that
- A. the authors share a common point of view
- B. the authors are likely sports journalists for the same newspaper
- C. the authors each supported a different team in the game described
- D. the authors recognized that the referees of the game favored the Hawks
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
In evaluating the differences between the two accounts, it can be inferred that the authors each supported a different team in the game described. This perspective often leads to varying interpretations of key moments and decisions, reflecting their biases. Option A is incorrect because sharing a common point of view would result in similar accounts, which contradicts the premise of differences. Option B assumes a professional relationship that is not supported by the text; different viewpoints suggest they may not be affiliated. Option D implies a shared judgment about the referees, which does not align with the distinct perspectives presented in their accounts.
In evaluating the differences between the two accounts, it can be inferred that the authors each supported a different team in the game described. This perspective often leads to varying interpretations of key moments and decisions, reflecting their biases. Option A is incorrect because sharing a common point of view would result in similar accounts, which contradicts the premise of differences. Option B assumes a professional relationship that is not supported by the text; different viewpoints suggest they may not be affiliated. Option D implies a shared judgment about the referees, which does not align with the distinct perspectives presented in their accounts.
Other Related Questions
Which of the following teacher recommendations will best help the student to strengthen the essay?
- A. Add evidence from the text.
- B. Focus the argument on one topic.
- C. State the argument in the first sentence.
- D. Write a conclusion sentence that restates the main idea.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Focusing the argument on one topic allows for a more coherent and persuasive essay, enhancing clarity and depth. This concentrated approach helps the student develop their ideas thoroughly, making their argument more compelling. Adding evidence from the text (A) is important, but without a clear focus, the evidence may not effectively support the argument. Stating the argument in the first sentence (C) is useful for clarity, but it does not address the overall structure and focus needed for a strong essay. Writing a conclusion that restates the main idea (D) is essential for summarizing, but it does not strengthen the argument itself if the essay lacks focus.
Focusing the argument on one topic allows for a more coherent and persuasive essay, enhancing clarity and depth. This concentrated approach helps the student develop their ideas thoroughly, making their argument more compelling. Adding evidence from the text (A) is important, but without a clear focus, the evidence may not effectively support the argument. Stating the argument in the first sentence (C) is useful for clarity, but it does not address the overall structure and focus needed for a strong essay. Writing a conclusion that restates the main idea (D) is essential for summarizing, but it does not strengthen the argument itself if the essay lacks focus.
The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and to raise twice the amount of money as they did last year. Which of the following revisions successfully corrects the sentence?
- A. The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and that they would raise twice the amount of money as they did last year.
- B. The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and raising twice the amount of money as they did last year.
- C. The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and, consequently, to raise twice the amount of money as they did last year.
- D. The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend; that the keynote speaker would be well received; and to raise twice the amount of money as they did last year.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Option A effectively maintains parallel structure by ensuring all elements in the list follow the same grammatical form: "that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and that they would raise twice the amount of money." This consistency enhances clarity and coherence. Option B disrupts parallelism by changing "to raise" to "raising," which creates a grammatical inconsistency in the series. Option C introduces "consequently," which unnecessarily complicates the sentence and breaks the parallel structure. Option D uses semicolons incorrectly, as they should separate independent clauses, not items in a list, leading to confusion.
Option A effectively maintains parallel structure by ensuring all elements in the list follow the same grammatical form: "that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and that they would raise twice the amount of money." This consistency enhances clarity and coherence. Option B disrupts parallelism by changing "to raise" to "raising," which creates a grammatical inconsistency in the series. Option C introduces "consequently," which unnecessarily complicates the sentence and breaks the parallel structure. Option D uses semicolons incorrectly, as they should separate independent clauses, not items in a list, leading to confusion.
Which THREE of the following questions target phoneme manipulation?
- A. What happens when you take the /f/ off of the word "flap"?
- B. Can you clap each word in the sentence, "I am mad"?
- C. Can you name a word with the same ending sound as the word "cap"?
- D. What word do you get when you add /s/ to the beginning of the word "lap"?
- E. What do you do to change the word "pan" to the word "pin"?
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A,D,E
Phoneme manipulation involves changing, adding, or removing sounds in words. Options A, D, and E effectively target this skill. Option A asks what happens when /f/ is removed from "flap," requiring the student to manipulate sounds by deletion. Option D involves adding /s/ to "lap," which focuses on sound addition. Option E prompts the student to identify how to change "pan" to "pin," emphasizing sound substitution. In contrast, Option B focuses on syllable clapping, which relates to syllable awareness rather than phoneme manipulation. Option C targets rhyme recognition, asking for a word with a similar ending sound, which does not involve altering sounds within a word.
Phoneme manipulation involves changing, adding, or removing sounds in words. Options A, D, and E effectively target this skill. Option A asks what happens when /f/ is removed from "flap," requiring the student to manipulate sounds by deletion. Option D involves adding /s/ to "lap," which focuses on sound addition. Option E prompts the student to identify how to change "pan" to "pin," emphasizing sound substitution. In contrast, Option B focuses on syllable clapping, which relates to syllable awareness rather than phoneme manipulation. Option C targets rhyme recognition, asking for a word with a similar ending sound, which does not involve altering sounds within a word.
Which of the following statements is true?
- A. In sentence 1, the word "knew" is functioning as an adverb.
- B. In sentence 1, the word "knew" is functioning as a verb.
- C. In sentence 3, the word "really" is functioning as an adjective.
- D. In sentence 3, the word "really" is functioning as a noun.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
In sentence 1, "knew" serves as a verb, indicating an action or state of being related to knowledge. This aligns with its grammatical role as a past tense verb, which expresses what someone understood or was aware of. Option A is incorrect as "knew" cannot function as an adverb; adverbs modify verbs, adjectives, or other adverbs, not serve as the main verb in a sentence. Option C misinterprets "really," which typically acts as an adverb to modify verbs or adjectives, not as an adjective itself. Option D is also incorrect since "really" does not function as a noun; it does not represent a person, place, thing, or idea.
In sentence 1, "knew" serves as a verb, indicating an action or state of being related to knowledge. This aligns with its grammatical role as a past tense verb, which expresses what someone understood or was aware of. Option A is incorrect as "knew" cannot function as an adverb; adverbs modify verbs, adjectives, or other adverbs, not serve as the main verb in a sentence. Option C misinterprets "really," which typically acts as an adverb to modify verbs or adjectives, not as an adjective itself. Option D is also incorrect since "really" does not function as a noun; it does not represent a person, place, thing, or idea.