A scientist uses the expression 5/9(F - 32) to convert temperatures from degrees Fahrenheit (°F), F, to degrees Celsius (°C). To the nearest degree, what is the temperature, in °F, of a substance at -25°C?
- A. 13
- B. -32
- C. -13
- D. 18
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the Fahrenheit equivalent of -25°C, use the formula \( F = \frac{9}{5}C + 32 \). Substituting -25 for C gives \( F = \frac{9}{5}(-25) + 32 = -45 + 32 = -13 \). Thus, the temperature in Fahrenheit is -13°F. Option A (13°F) is incorrect as it does not reflect the negative temperature conversion. Option B (-32°F) is too low and does not correspond to the calculated value. Option D (18°F) is also incorrect as it is significantly higher than the expected result for -25°C.
To find the Fahrenheit equivalent of -25°C, use the formula \( F = \frac{9}{5}C + 32 \). Substituting -25 for C gives \( F = \frac{9}{5}(-25) + 32 = -45 + 32 = -13 \). Thus, the temperature in Fahrenheit is -13°F. Option A (13°F) is incorrect as it does not reflect the negative temperature conversion. Option B (-32°F) is too low and does not correspond to the calculated value. Option D (18°F) is also incorrect as it is significantly higher than the expected result for -25°C.
Other Related Questions
The daily cost, C(x), for a company to produce x microscopes is given by the equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. What is the cost of producing 50 microscopes?
- A. $41,250
- B. $360.50
- C. $15,525
- D. $825
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the cost of producing 50 microscopes, substitute x = 50 into the equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. This gives C(50) = 300 + 10.5(50) = 300 + 525 = 825. Thus, the total cost is $825. Option A ($41,250) is incorrect as it miscalculates the cost by multiplying incorrectly. Option B ($360.50) results from a misunderstanding of the equation, possibly neglecting the fixed cost. Option C ($15,525) likely arises from an error in multiplying the variable cost without adding the fixed cost. Each incorrect option fails to follow the proper calculation method outlined in the cost equation.
To determine the cost of producing 50 microscopes, substitute x = 50 into the equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. This gives C(50) = 300 + 10.5(50) = 300 + 525 = 825. Thus, the total cost is $825. Option A ($41,250) is incorrect as it miscalculates the cost by multiplying incorrectly. Option B ($360.50) results from a misunderstanding of the equation, possibly neglecting the fixed cost. Option C ($15,525) likely arises from an error in multiplying the variable cost without adding the fixed cost. Each incorrect option fails to follow the proper calculation method outlined in the cost equation.
Read the phrase below.
the quotient of three less than a number and six more than four times a number
Which expression is equivalent to this phrase?
- A. (3-x)/(4x + 6)
- B. (x - 3)(4x + 6)
- C. (x-3)/(4x + 6)
- D. 4x - 3 + 6
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The phrase describes a mathematical expression involving a number, denoted as \( x \). "Three less than a number" translates to \( x - 3 \), while "six more than four times a number" translates to \( 4x + 6 \). Therefore, the entire expression is the quotient of these two parts, resulting in \( \frac{x - 3}{4x + 6} \), which matches option C. Option A incorrectly suggests a subtraction in the numerator, altering the intended expression. Option B implies multiplication instead of division, misrepresenting the relationship. Option D presents a simplified expression rather than a quotient, which does not align with the original phrase.
The phrase describes a mathematical expression involving a number, denoted as \( x \). "Three less than a number" translates to \( x - 3 \), while "six more than four times a number" translates to \( 4x + 6 \). Therefore, the entire expression is the quotient of these two parts, resulting in \( \frac{x - 3}{4x + 6} \), which matches option C. Option A incorrectly suggests a subtraction in the numerator, altering the intended expression. Option B implies multiplication instead of division, misrepresenting the relationship. Option D presents a simplified expression rather than a quotient, which does not align with the original phrase.
Which graph represents the equation x - 2y = 4?
-
A.
-
B.
-
C.
-
D.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine which graph represents the equation \( x - 2y = 4 \), we can rearrange it into slope-intercept form: \( y = \frac{1}{2}x - 2 \). This indicates a slope of \( \frac{1}{2} \) and a y-intercept at \( -2 \). Option A accurately reflects these characteristics, showing a line that rises gradually and crosses the y-axis at \( -2 \). Options B, C, and D do not have the correct slope or y-intercept. B has a steeper slope, C slopes downward, and D does not intersect the y-axis at the correct point. Thus, only Option A is consistent with the equation's graph.
To determine which graph represents the equation \( x - 2y = 4 \), we can rearrange it into slope-intercept form: \( y = \frac{1}{2}x - 2 \). This indicates a slope of \( \frac{1}{2} \) and a y-intercept at \( -2 \). Option A accurately reflects these characteristics, showing a line that rises gradually and crosses the y-axis at \( -2 \). Options B, C, and D do not have the correct slope or y-intercept. B has a steeper slope, C slopes downward, and D does not intersect the y-axis at the correct point. Thus, only Option A is consistent with the equation's graph.
Lisa is decorating her office with two fully stocked aquariums. She saw an advertisement for Jorge's pet store in the newspaper. Jorge's store sells fish for aquariums. The table shows the fish Lisa buys from Jorge's pet store.
Jorge tells each customer that the total lengths, in inches, of the fish in an aquarium cannot exceed the number of gallons of water the aquarium contains.
The newspaper advertisement for Jorge's pet store has an illustration of a gold barb.
The illustration is not the same length as the actual gold barb. What was the scale factor used to create the illustration?
- A. 0.75
- B. 1.25
- C. 1.75
- D. 1.75
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the scale factor used in the illustration of the gold barb, we compare the actual length of the fish to the length shown in the advertisement. A scale factor greater than 1 indicates that the illustration is larger than the actual fish, while a scale factor less than 1 means it is smaller. Option A (0.75) suggests the illustration is smaller, which contradicts the premise. Option C (1.75) and D (1.75) both imply a larger size, but only one option can be correct. The scale factor of 1.25 accurately represents a reasonable enlargement of the fish, aligning with common advertising practices. Thus, it correctly reflects the relationship between the illustration and the actual size of the gold barb.
To determine the scale factor used in the illustration of the gold barb, we compare the actual length of the fish to the length shown in the advertisement. A scale factor greater than 1 indicates that the illustration is larger than the actual fish, while a scale factor less than 1 means it is smaller. Option A (0.75) suggests the illustration is smaller, which contradicts the premise. Option C (1.75) and D (1.75) both imply a larger size, but only one option can be correct. The scale factor of 1.25 accurately represents a reasonable enlargement of the fish, aligning with common advertising practices. Thus, it correctly reflects the relationship between the illustration and the actual size of the gold barb.