The 1912 Tariff Debate
The passage and political cartoons provide information about the 1912 tariff debate.
1 The election of 1912, Eke many elections, was a contest of ideas. The four candidates for president had very different views on the role of government. These differences were clearly evident in the candidates' position on tariffs – taxes charged on imported goods. Democrat Woodrow Wilson argued that the economic role of the federal government should be limited. He supported reducing tariffs to decrease government involvement in the economy. Republican William Taft argued that the federal government had an obligation to protect American businesses and workers. A high tariff would limit competition from foreign companies and would, therefore, benefit American businesses. The Progressive candidate, Theodore Roosevelt, tock a more moderate view. He believed that the government should control and supervise the economy. But he argued against a blanket tariff on all
As president, what power did Woodrow Wilson have to prevent Congress from raising tariffs?
- A. The power to appoint officials
- B. The power to enforce the law
- C. The power to make treaties
- D. The power to veto bills
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Woodrow Wilson's ability to prevent Congress from raising tariffs stemmed from his power to veto bills. This authority allowed him to reject legislation that he deemed unfavorable, including tariff increases. Option A, the power to appoint officials, does not directly influence tariff legislation. Option B, the power to enforce the law, pertains to executing laws rather than preventing their passage. Option C, the power to make treaties, relates to international agreements and has no bearing on domestic tariff policies. Thus, the veto power was the key tool Wilson could use to block tariff increases.
Woodrow Wilson's ability to prevent Congress from raising tariffs stemmed from his power to veto bills. This authority allowed him to reject legislation that he deemed unfavorable, including tariff increases. Option A, the power to appoint officials, does not directly influence tariff legislation. Option B, the power to enforce the law, pertains to executing laws rather than preventing their passage. Option C, the power to make treaties, relates to international agreements and has no bearing on domestic tariff policies. Thus, the veto power was the key tool Wilson could use to block tariff increases.
Other Related Questions
Different states set different minimum age requirements for getting a driver's license. Which amendment allows this?
- A. Amendment 1
- B. Amendment 5
- C. Amendment 6
- D. Amendment 10
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The Tenth Amendment reserves powers not delegated to the federal government for the states. This includes the authority to regulate matters such as driver's licenses, allowing each state to establish its own minimum age requirements. Option A (Amendment 1) protects freedoms like speech and religion, unrelated to state licensing powers. Option B (Amendment 5) addresses rights in criminal cases and due process, not state regulations on driving. Option C (Amendment 6) focuses on the rights of criminal defendants, which does not pertain to licensing authority. Thus, the Tenth Amendment is the foundation for state control over driver's license regulations.
The Tenth Amendment reserves powers not delegated to the federal government for the states. This includes the authority to regulate matters such as driver's licenses, allowing each state to establish its own minimum age requirements. Option A (Amendment 1) protects freedoms like speech and religion, unrelated to state licensing powers. Option B (Amendment 5) addresses rights in criminal cases and due process, not state regulations on driving. Option C (Amendment 6) focuses on the rights of criminal defendants, which does not pertain to licensing authority. Thus, the Tenth Amendment is the foundation for state control over driver's license regulations.
Which point on this PPF graph represents a currently unobtainable output level for this economy?
- A. V
- B. X
- C. Y
- D. Z
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Point D represents a currently unobtainable output level for this economy because it lies outside the production possibilities frontier (PPF). The PPF illustrates the maximum efficient production of two goods, given the available resources and technology. Point A (V), Point B (X), and Point C (Y) are all located on or within the PPF, indicating feasible production levels that the economy can achieve. In contrast, Point D (Z) exceeds these capabilities, signifying an output level that cannot be realized with the current resources and technology. Thus, only Point D is unattainable.
Point D represents a currently unobtainable output level for this economy because it lies outside the production possibilities frontier (PPF). The PPF illustrates the maximum efficient production of two goods, given the available resources and technology. Point A (V), Point B (X), and Point C (Y) are all located on or within the PPF, indicating feasible production levels that the economy can achieve. In contrast, Point D (Z) exceeds these capabilities, signifying an output level that cannot be realized with the current resources and technology. Thus, only Point D is unattainable.
Assume that the state of Kansas passed a law limiting the number of hours teenagers could work on farms, and the state's farmers challenged the law. The decision in which of these cases could be cited in support of Kansas's law?
- A. Commonwealth v. Hunt
- B. Muller v. Oregon
- C. Brown v. Board of Education
- D. Engel v. Vitale
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Muller v. Oregon upheld the state's ability to regulate working hours for women, emphasizing the government's role in protecting public welfare. This precedent supports Kansas's law limiting teenage work hours on farms, as it aligns with the principle of safeguarding minors' health and well-being. Commonwealth v. Hunt dealt with labor unions and the right to organize, which does not pertain to youth labor regulations. Brown v. Board of Education focused on desegregation in schools, irrelevant to labor laws. Engel v. Vitale addressed school prayer, having no connection to employment issues. Thus, only Muller v. Oregon directly supports the rationale for Kansas's law.
Muller v. Oregon upheld the state's ability to regulate working hours for women, emphasizing the government's role in protecting public welfare. This precedent supports Kansas's law limiting teenage work hours on farms, as it aligns with the principle of safeguarding minors' health and well-being. Commonwealth v. Hunt dealt with labor unions and the right to organize, which does not pertain to youth labor regulations. Brown v. Board of Education focused on desegregation in schools, irrelevant to labor laws. Engel v. Vitale addressed school prayer, having no connection to employment issues. Thus, only Muller v. Oregon directly supports the rationale for Kansas's law.
Most governmental power under the Articles of Confederation belonged to
- A. the states.
- B. the king.
- C. the president.
- D. the judiciary.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Under the Articles of Confederation, most governmental power resided with the states, reflecting the desire for local governance and autonomy after independence. This decentralization limited the federal government's authority, making option A the most accurate choice. Option B, the king, is incorrect as the Articles were established to break away from monarchical rule. Option C, the president, is misleading since the Articles did not create a strong executive branch; the role of president was largely ceremonial. Option D, the judiciary, is also wrong as the Articles provided minimal judicial power, leaving most authority with state courts.
Under the Articles of Confederation, most governmental power resided with the states, reflecting the desire for local governance and autonomy after independence. This decentralization limited the federal government's authority, making option A the most accurate choice. Option B, the king, is incorrect as the Articles were established to break away from monarchical rule. Option C, the president, is misleading since the Articles did not create a strong executive branch; the role of president was largely ceremonial. Option D, the judiciary, is also wrong as the Articles provided minimal judicial power, leaving most authority with state courts.