The 1912 Tariff Debate
The passage and political cartoons provide information about the 1912 tariff debate.
1 The election of 1912, Eke many elections, was a contest of ideas. The four candidates for president had very different views on the role of government. These differences were clearly evident in the candidates' position on tariffs – taxes charged on imported goods. Democrat Woodrow Wilson argued that the economic role of the federal government should be limited. He supported reducing tariffs to decrease government involvement in the economy. Republican William Taft argued that the federal government had an obligation to protect American businesses and workers. A high tariff would limit competition from foreign companies and would, therefore, benefit American businesses. The Progressive candidate, Theodore Roosevelt, tock a more moderate view. He believed that the government should control and supervise the economy. But he argued against a blanket tariff on all
According to Cartoon 2, how were American laborers affected by foreign laborers?
- A. A larger supply of labor tends to drive down wages.
- B. A growing population tends to raise the cost of living.
- C. A growing demand for jobs tends to increase productivity.
- D. A larger labor market tends to provide better job opportunities.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
American laborers faced wage reductions due to the influx of foreign laborers, as indicated in Cartoon 2. A larger supply of labor typically leads to increased competition for jobs, resulting in lower wages for workers. Option B incorrectly suggests that a growing population raises living costs; while this can be true, it does not directly address the impact of foreign labor on American workers' wages. Option C focuses on job demand increasing productivity, which is unrelated to the effects of foreign labor on wages. Option D claims a larger labor market provides better job opportunities, but this overlooks the wage suppression effect highlighted in the cartoon.
American laborers faced wage reductions due to the influx of foreign laborers, as indicated in Cartoon 2. A larger supply of labor typically leads to increased competition for jobs, resulting in lower wages for workers. Option B incorrectly suggests that a growing population raises living costs; while this can be true, it does not directly address the impact of foreign labor on American workers' wages. Option C focuses on job demand increasing productivity, which is unrelated to the effects of foreign labor on wages. Option D claims a larger labor market provides better job opportunities, but this overlooks the wage suppression effect highlighted in the cartoon.
Other Related Questions
Which point on this PPF graph indicates an inefficient use of the country's resources?
- A. V
- B. X
- C. Y
- D. Z
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Point A on the PPF graph indicates an inefficient use of the country's resources because it lies inside the production possibilities frontier (PPF). This suggests that the economy is not utilizing all available resources effectively, resulting in lower production levels than possible. Point B (X), C (Y), and D (Z) all lie on the PPF, indicating efficient resource use where maximum production is achieved. These points represent combinations of goods that utilize resources fully, reflecting optimal economic performance. Thus, only point A signifies inefficiency.
Point A on the PPF graph indicates an inefficient use of the country's resources because it lies inside the production possibilities frontier (PPF). This suggests that the economy is not utilizing all available resources effectively, resulting in lower production levels than possible. Point B (X), C (Y), and D (Z) all lie on the PPF, indicating efficient resource use where maximum production is achieved. These points represent combinations of goods that utilize resources fully, reflecting optimal economic performance. Thus, only point A signifies inefficiency.
A drought strikes Toland and decreases the amount of fish caught from 8 units to 2 units. How will this change affect trade negotiations for the following year?
- A. The countries should maintain the existing agreement.
- B. Both countries should produce both goods.
- C. Toland should specialize in the production of timber.
- D. Toland should specialize in the production of fish.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
A decrease in fish catch due to drought shifts Toland's production capabilities. Specializing in timber (Option C) allows Toland to focus on a resource that can still be produced effectively, potentially increasing trade value. Maintaining the existing agreement (Option A) ignores the new realities of reduced fish availability, which could lead to imbalances. Producing both goods (Option B) may spread resources too thin, hindering efficiency. Specializing in fish (Option D) is unwise, as the drought has drastically reduced fish availability, making it impractical to rely on this sector.
A decrease in fish catch due to drought shifts Toland's production capabilities. Specializing in timber (Option C) allows Toland to focus on a resource that can still be produced effectively, potentially increasing trade value. Maintaining the existing agreement (Option A) ignores the new realities of reduced fish availability, which could lead to imbalances. Producing both goods (Option B) may spread resources too thin, hindering efficiency. Specializing in fish (Option D) is unwise, as the drought has drastically reduced fish availability, making it impractical to rely on this sector.
After the Revolutionary War, the western border of the United States was the
- A. Mississippi River.
- B. Gulf of Mexico.
- C. Rocky Mountains.
- D. Great Lakes.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
The western border of the United States after the Revolutionary War was defined by the Mississippi River, which served as a natural boundary facilitating westward expansion. Option B, the Gulf of Mexico, is incorrect as it is located to the south, not marking the western border. Option C, the Rocky Mountains, is also inaccurate; while they are a significant geographical feature, they were not recognized as a border at that time. Option D, the Great Lakes, pertains to the northern boundary and does not represent the western limit. Thus, the Mississippi River accurately reflects the western boundary post-war.
The western border of the United States after the Revolutionary War was defined by the Mississippi River, which served as a natural boundary facilitating westward expansion. Option B, the Gulf of Mexico, is incorrect as it is located to the south, not marking the western border. Option C, the Rocky Mountains, is also inaccurate; while they are a significant geographical feature, they were not recognized as a border at that time. Option D, the Great Lakes, pertains to the northern boundary and does not represent the western limit. Thus, the Mississippi River accurately reflects the western boundary post-war.
What was the impact of the Brandenburg v. Ohio ruling on an individual's right to freedom of speech?
- A. It allowed for more freedom.
- B. It created further restrictions.
- C. It had no effect on free speech issues.
- D. It created a special class of speech regarding racial issues.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
The Brandenburg v. Ohio ruling significantly expanded individual rights to freedom of speech by establishing the "imminent lawless action" standard. This meant that speech could only be restricted if it incited immediate illegal activity, thereby allowing for more robust expression of ideas, even controversial ones. Option B is incorrect as the ruling lessened restrictions on speech rather than increasing them. Option C misrepresents the ruling's significance; it directly influenced free speech protections. Option D is also inaccurate, as the ruling did not create a special class of speech but rather reinforced protections for all forms of expression.
The Brandenburg v. Ohio ruling significantly expanded individual rights to freedom of speech by establishing the "imminent lawless action" standard. This meant that speech could only be restricted if it incited immediate illegal activity, thereby allowing for more robust expression of ideas, even controversial ones. Option B is incorrect as the ruling lessened restrictions on speech rather than increasing them. Option C misrepresents the ruling's significance; it directly influenced free speech protections. Option D is also inaccurate, as the ruling did not create a special class of speech but rather reinforced protections for all forms of expression.