Kelly has a home business making jewellery. It takes 2 hours for her to make each bracelet and 3.5 hours to make each necklace. Next month she plans to spend 140 hours to make jewellery. If she fills a special order for 22 bracelets at the beginning of the mouth and spends the rest of the month making necklaces, how many necklaces can Kelly make in the month
- A. 52
- B. 27
- C. 40
- D. 31
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine how many necklaces Kelly can make, first calculate the time spent on bracelets. Making 22 bracelets takes 22 x 2 = 44 hours. Subtracting this from her total available time of 140 hours leaves her with 140 - 44 = 96 hours for necklaces. Each necklace takes 3.5 hours, so she can make 96 ÷ 3.5 = 27.43, which rounds down to 27 necklaces since she cannot make a fraction of a necklace. Options A (52), C (40), and D (31) are incorrect because they exceed the available time after accounting for the hours spent on bracelets, indicating miscalculations in time management or misunderstanding of the problem constraints.
To determine how many necklaces Kelly can make, first calculate the time spent on bracelets. Making 22 bracelets takes 22 x 2 = 44 hours. Subtracting this from her total available time of 140 hours leaves her with 140 - 44 = 96 hours for necklaces. Each necklace takes 3.5 hours, so she can make 96 ÷ 3.5 = 27.43, which rounds down to 27 necklaces since she cannot make a fraction of a necklace. Options A (52), C (40), and D (31) are incorrect because they exceed the available time after accounting for the hours spent on bracelets, indicating miscalculations in time management or misunderstanding of the problem constraints.
Other Related Questions
Solve the equation for x: ½ x + 9 = -2/3 x
- A. x=-9/7
- B. x=-54/7
- C. x=-6
- D. x=-54
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To solve the equation \( \frac{1}{2}x + 9 = -\frac{2}{3}x \), start by eliminating the fractions. Multiply the entire equation by 6 (the least common multiple of 2 and 3) to obtain \( 3x + 54 = -4x \). Next, combine like terms: adding \( 4x \) to both sides gives \( 7x + 54 = 0 \), leading to \( 7x = -54 \) and thus \( x = -\frac{54}{7} \). Option A is incorrect as it simplifies to a different value. Option C, \( x = -6 \), does not satisfy the original equation. Option D, \( x = -54 \), is also incorrect as it does not balance the equation. Therefore, the only viable solution is \( x = -\frac{54}{7} \).
To solve the equation \( \frac{1}{2}x + 9 = -\frac{2}{3}x \), start by eliminating the fractions. Multiply the entire equation by 6 (the least common multiple of 2 and 3) to obtain \( 3x + 54 = -4x \). Next, combine like terms: adding \( 4x \) to both sides gives \( 7x + 54 = 0 \), leading to \( 7x = -54 \) and thus \( x = -\frac{54}{7} \). Option A is incorrect as it simplifies to a different value. Option C, \( x = -6 \), does not satisfy the original equation. Option D, \( x = -54 \), is also incorrect as it does not balance the equation. Therefore, the only viable solution is \( x = -\frac{54}{7} \).
Laura walks every evening on the edges of a sports field near her house. The field is in the shape of a rectangle 300 feet (ft) long and 200 ft wide, so 1 lap on the edges of the field is 1,000 ft. She enters through a gate at point G, located exactly halfway along the length of the field.
Laura counts the number of strides she takes during her daily walks. She takes about 80 strides to walk the width of the field from Z to W. Assuming that her stride length does not change, about how many strides does Laura take to walk all the way around the edge of the field?
- A. 267
- B. 320
- C. 450
- D. 400
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the number of strides Laura takes to walk around the field, we first calculate the total distance of one lap, which is 1,000 feet. Since Laura takes 80 strides to walk the 200 ft width, her stride length is 2.5 ft (200 ft ÷ 80 strides). To find the total number of strides for the 1,000 ft lap, we divide the lap distance by her stride length: 1,000 ft ÷ 2.5 ft/stride = 400 strides. Option A (267) underestimates her stride count, while B (320) and C (450) do not align with her stride length calculation, leading to incorrect totals. Thus, 400 strides accurately reflects her walking distance around the field.
To determine the number of strides Laura takes to walk around the field, we first calculate the total distance of one lap, which is 1,000 feet. Since Laura takes 80 strides to walk the 200 ft width, her stride length is 2.5 ft (200 ft ÷ 80 strides). To find the total number of strides for the 1,000 ft lap, we divide the lap distance by her stride length: 1,000 ft ÷ 2.5 ft/stride = 400 strides. Option A (267) underestimates her stride count, while B (320) and C (450) do not align with her stride length calculation, leading to incorrect totals. Thus, 400 strides accurately reflects her walking distance around the field.
Which expression is undefined over the real numbers?
- A. (-3)^0
- B. 0/4
- C. |-2|
- D. (-7)^(1/2)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The expression (-7)^(1/2) is undefined over the real numbers because it represents the square root of a negative number, which does not yield a real result. Option A, (-3)^0, equals 1, as any non-zero number raised to the power of 0 is defined. Option B, 0/4, simplifies to 0, which is a defined real number. Option C, |-2|, equals 2, as the absolute value of any number is always defined and non-negative. Thus, only (-7)^(1/2) fails to produce a real number, making it the only undefined expression in this context.
The expression (-7)^(1/2) is undefined over the real numbers because it represents the square root of a negative number, which does not yield a real result. Option A, (-3)^0, equals 1, as any non-zero number raised to the power of 0 is defined. Option B, 0/4, simplifies to 0, which is a defined real number. Option C, |-2|, equals 2, as the absolute value of any number is always defined and non-negative. Thus, only (-7)^(1/2) fails to produce a real number, making it the only undefined expression in this context.
Which list shows the numbers arranged from least to greatest?
- A. -(2/9), -0.21, -0.2, -(2/11), -1
- B. -1, -(2/9), -0.21, -0.2, -(2/11)
- C. -1, -(2/11), -0.21, -0.2, -(2/9)
- D. -(2/11), -0.2, -0.21, -(2/9), -1
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the correct order, it's essential to convert fractions and decimals to comparable values. In option C, the numbers arranged from least to greatest are: -1, approximately -0.1818 (for -(2/11)), -0.21, -0.2, and approximately -0.2222 (for -(2/9)). This sequence accurately reflects their values. Option A incorrectly places -1 at the end, misordering the fractions and decimals. Option B also misplaces -1, and the order of the decimals is incorrect. Option D incorrectly ranks -1 as the least value and misplaces the fraction values, leading to an inaccurate arrangement.
To determine the correct order, it's essential to convert fractions and decimals to comparable values. In option C, the numbers arranged from least to greatest are: -1, approximately -0.1818 (for -(2/11)), -0.21, -0.2, and approximately -0.2222 (for -(2/9)). This sequence accurately reflects their values. Option A incorrectly places -1 at the end, misordering the fractions and decimals. Option B also misplaces -1, and the order of the decimals is incorrect. Option D incorrectly ranks -1 as the least value and misplaces the fraction values, leading to an inaccurate arrangement.