A carpenter is installing shelves in 2 offices. Each office will have 4 shelves. The wood the carpenter wants to use comes in 6-foot-long boards. Each shelf is 2 ¼ feet long and is constructed from a single board. How many boards does the carpenter need to buy to make the shelves?
- A. 2
- B. 8
- C. 3
- D. 4
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine how many boards are needed, first calculate the total length of wood required for the shelves. Each office has 4 shelves, and with 2 offices, that totals 8 shelves. Each shelf is 2 ¼ feet long, which equals 2.25 feet. Therefore, the total length required is 8 shelves x 2.25 feet = 18 feet. Each board is 6 feet long. Dividing the total length (18 feet) by the length of each board (6 feet) gives 3 boards. However, since each board can only be used for one shelf, and we can't cut a board to make multiple shelves, we need to round up to the nearest whole number of boards needed, which is 4. - Option A (2 boards) is insufficient for the total length required. - Option B (8 boards) exceeds the necessary amount. - Option C (3 boards) miscalculates the total need based on the cut requirement. Thus, 4 boards are necessary to accommodate all shelves without waste.
To determine how many boards are needed, first calculate the total length of wood required for the shelves. Each office has 4 shelves, and with 2 offices, that totals 8 shelves. Each shelf is 2 ¼ feet long, which equals 2.25 feet. Therefore, the total length required is 8 shelves x 2.25 feet = 18 feet. Each board is 6 feet long. Dividing the total length (18 feet) by the length of each board (6 feet) gives 3 boards. However, since each board can only be used for one shelf, and we can't cut a board to make multiple shelves, we need to round up to the nearest whole number of boards needed, which is 4. - Option A (2 boards) is insufficient for the total length required. - Option B (8 boards) exceeds the necessary amount. - Option C (3 boards) miscalculates the total need based on the cut requirement. Thus, 4 boards are necessary to accommodate all shelves without waste.
Other Related Questions
Compare the zeros of function P and function Q. Which statement about the zeros of the functions is true?
- A. Function P has the greater zero, which is 9.
- B. Function P has the greater zero, which is 1.
- C. Function Q has the greater zero, which is 5.
- D. Function Q has the greater zero, which is 4.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine which statement is true regarding the zeros of functions P and Q, it's essential to analyze the values given. Option A claims that function P's greater zero is 9; however, this contradicts the provided information, as 9 is not a zero for P. Option B asserts that function P's greater zero is 1, which is also incorrect if 1 is not the highest zero of P. Option D states that function Q's greater zero is 4, but if Q's zeros are higher, this option cannot be true. In contrast, option C correctly identifies that function Q has a greater zero, specifically 5, which aligns with the provided data about the functions' zeros.
To determine which statement is true regarding the zeros of functions P and Q, it's essential to analyze the values given. Option A claims that function P's greater zero is 9; however, this contradicts the provided information, as 9 is not a zero for P. Option B asserts that function P's greater zero is 1, which is also incorrect if 1 is not the highest zero of P. Option D states that function Q's greater zero is 4, but if Q's zeros are higher, this option cannot be true. In contrast, option C correctly identifies that function Q has a greater zero, specifically 5, which aligns with the provided data about the functions' zeros.
Acceleration, a, in meters per second squared (m/5}), is found by the formula a= (V2-V2)/t where V1, is the beginning velocity, V2 is the end velocity, and t is time. What is the acceleration, in m/s^2, of an object with a beginning velocity of 14 m/s and end velocity of 8 m/s over a time of 4 seconds?
- A. 1.5
- B. -1.5
- C. 4.5
- D. -12
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To find acceleration, use the formula \( a = \frac{V2 - V1}{t} \). Here, \( V1 = 14 \, \text{m/s} \) and \( V2 = 8 \, \text{m/s} \). Plugging in the values gives \( a = \frac{8 - 14}{4} = \frac{-6}{4} = -1.5 \, \text{m/s}^2 \). Option A (1.5) is incorrect as it does not account for the decrease in velocity. Option C (4.5) miscalculates the difference between velocities and does not reflect the negative change. Option D (-12) results from incorrect arithmetic, misapplying the formula. Thus, the only accurate calculation shows the object is decelerating at -1.5 m/s².
To find acceleration, use the formula \( a = \frac{V2 - V1}{t} \). Here, \( V1 = 14 \, \text{m/s} \) and \( V2 = 8 \, \text{m/s} \). Plugging in the values gives \( a = \frac{8 - 14}{4} = \frac{-6}{4} = -1.5 \, \text{m/s}^2 \). Option A (1.5) is incorrect as it does not account for the decrease in velocity. Option C (4.5) miscalculates the difference between velocities and does not reflect the negative change. Option D (-12) results from incorrect arithmetic, misapplying the formula. Thus, the only accurate calculation shows the object is decelerating at -1.5 m/s².
John and Mike are participating in a long-distance bicycling event. Mike bicycled 24 miles in the first 2 hours. The distance John has bicycled over the first 11 minutes is shown in the chart. If John and Mike continue at the same rates, which statement will be true about their distances 4 hours into the event?
- A. John will be 6 miles ahead of Mike.
- B. John will be 12 miles ahead of Mike.
- C. Mike will be 6 miles ahead of John.
- D. Mike will be 12 miles ahead of John.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine who is ahead after 4 hours, we first calculate the speeds of both cyclists. Mike's speed is 12 miles per hour (24 miles in 2 hours). In 4 hours, he will cover 48 miles (12 mph x 4 hours). John's distance after 11 minutes (or 0.183 hours) needs to be extrapolated. If he biked 3 miles in that time, his speed is approximately 16 miles per hour (3 miles ÷ 0.183 hours). Over 4 hours, John would cover about 64 miles (16 mph x 4 hours). Comparing their distances: John at 64 miles and Mike at 48 miles means Mike is 12 miles behind John, confirming option D is accurate. Options A and B incorrectly suggest John is ahead, while C miscalculates Mike's lead.
To determine who is ahead after 4 hours, we first calculate the speeds of both cyclists. Mike's speed is 12 miles per hour (24 miles in 2 hours). In 4 hours, he will cover 48 miles (12 mph x 4 hours). John's distance after 11 minutes (or 0.183 hours) needs to be extrapolated. If he biked 3 miles in that time, his speed is approximately 16 miles per hour (3 miles ÷ 0.183 hours). Over 4 hours, John would cover about 64 miles (16 mph x 4 hours). Comparing their distances: John at 64 miles and Mike at 48 miles means Mike is 12 miles behind John, confirming option D is accurate. Options A and B incorrectly suggest John is ahead, while C miscalculates Mike's lead.
Which expression is equivalent to (3a + 4ab - 7b) - (a + 2ab - 4b)?
- A. 2a + 2ab - 11b
- B. 2a + 6ab - 11b
- C. 2a + 2ab - 3b
- D. 2a + 6ab - 35
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To simplify the expression \((3a + 4ab - 7b) - (a + 2ab - 4b)\), start by distributing the negative sign across the second set of parentheses: \[ 3a + 4ab - 7b - a - 2ab + 4b \] Next, combine like terms: - For \(a\): \(3a - a = 2a\) - For \(ab\): \(4ab - 2ab = 2ab\) - For \(b\): \(-7b + 4b = -3b\) This results in the expression \(2a + 2ab - 3b\), matching option C. Option A introduces an incorrect coefficient for \(b\), while option B miscalculates the \(ab\) term. Option D incorrectly combines terms, leading to an erroneous constant. Thus, option C is the only accurate simplification.
To simplify the expression \((3a + 4ab - 7b) - (a + 2ab - 4b)\), start by distributing the negative sign across the second set of parentheses: \[ 3a + 4ab - 7b - a - 2ab + 4b \] Next, combine like terms: - For \(a\): \(3a - a = 2a\) - For \(ab\): \(4ab - 2ab = 2ab\) - For \(b\): \(-7b + 4b = -3b\) This results in the expression \(2a + 2ab - 3b\), matching option C. Option A introduces an incorrect coefficient for \(b\), while option B miscalculates the \(ab\) term. Option D incorrectly combines terms, leading to an erroneous constant. Thus, option C is the only accurate simplification.