The volume of 1 cup of water is 14.4 cubic inches. The diameter of an empty cylindrical can is 3.0 inches. The can holds 2.0 cups of water. What is the height of the can, to the nearest 0.1 inch?
- A. 1
- B. 2
- C. 3.1
- D. 4.1
- E. 6.2
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the height of the can, first determine the total volume of water it holds. Since 1 cup is 14.4 cubic inches, 2 cups equal 28.8 cubic inches (2 x 14.4). The formula for the volume of a cylinder is V = πr²h. The radius (r) of the can is half the diameter: 1.5 inches. Plugging in the values: 28.8 = π(1.5)²h. Calculating the area of the base gives approximately 7.07. Rearranging the equation for height (h) results in h ≈ 4.1 inches. Options A (1), B (2), C (3.1), and E (6.2) do not satisfy the volume calculation, as they yield heights inconsistent with the required volume based on the diameter provided.
To find the height of the can, first determine the total volume of water it holds. Since 1 cup is 14.4 cubic inches, 2 cups equal 28.8 cubic inches (2 x 14.4). The formula for the volume of a cylinder is V = πr²h. The radius (r) of the can is half the diameter: 1.5 inches. Plugging in the values: 28.8 = π(1.5)²h. Calculating the area of the base gives approximately 7.07. Rearranging the equation for height (h) results in h ≈ 4.1 inches. Options A (1), B (2), C (3.1), and E (6.2) do not satisfy the volume calculation, as they yield heights inconsistent with the required volume based on the diameter provided.
Other Related Questions
Let f(x) = 3x². What is f(-2x)?
- A. -36x²
- B. -12x²
- C. -6x²
- D. 12x²
- E. 36x²
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find f(-2x), substitute -2x into the function f(x) = 3x². This gives us f(-2x) = 3(-2x)². Calculating (-2x)² results in 4x², so we have f(-2x) = 3 * 4x² = 12x². Option A (-36x²) is incorrect because it misapplies the square and the coefficient. Option B (-12x²) incorrectly uses a negative sign and fails to account for the square of -2x. Option C (-6x²) mistakenly reduces the coefficient and sign. Option E (36x²) omits the multiplication by 3, leading to an incorrect coefficient. Thus, 12x² is the only valid outcome.
To find f(-2x), substitute -2x into the function f(x) = 3x². This gives us f(-2x) = 3(-2x)². Calculating (-2x)² results in 4x², so we have f(-2x) = 3 * 4x² = 12x². Option A (-36x²) is incorrect because it misapplies the square and the coefficient. Option B (-12x²) incorrectly uses a negative sign and fails to account for the square of -2x. Option C (-6x²) mistakenly reduces the coefficient and sign. Option E (36x²) omits the multiplication by 3, leading to an incorrect coefficient. Thus, 12x² is the only valid outcome.
The number of years the employee has been employed by the city is at least 25 years. The sum of the employee's age and number of years employed by the city is at least 90 years. Larry has been employed by the city since his 38th birthday. Assuming he continues to work for the city, at what age will he first qualify for full retirement benefits?
- A. 52
- B. 55
- C. 62
- D. 63
- E. 64
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: E
To qualify for full retirement benefits, Larry must be at least 25 years employed and have a combined age and years of service of at least 90 years. Since he started working at age 38, he will reach 25 years of employment at age 63. At that point, his age (63) plus his years of service (25) totals 88, which does not meet the 90-year requirement. At age 64, he will have 26 years of service, bringing the total to 90 years (64 + 26), thus meeting both criteria. Options A (52), B (55), and C (62) do not allow for 25 years of service, while D (63) fails to meet the age and service sum requirement.
To qualify for full retirement benefits, Larry must be at least 25 years employed and have a combined age and years of service of at least 90 years. Since he started working at age 38, he will reach 25 years of employment at age 63. At that point, his age (63) plus his years of service (25) totals 88, which does not meet the 90-year requirement. At age 64, he will have 26 years of service, bringing the total to 90 years (64 + 26), thus meeting both criteria. Options A (52), B (55), and C (62) do not allow for 25 years of service, while D (63) fails to meet the age and service sum requirement.
Josh takes 6 hours to paint a room. Margaret can paint the same room in 4 hours. Assuming their individual rates do not change, how long will it take them to paint the room together?
- A. 1.5 hours
- B. 2.4 hours
- C. 4.8 hours
- D. 5 hours
- E. 10 hours
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine how long it takes Josh and Margaret to paint the room together, we first calculate their individual rates. Josh paints at a rate of \( \frac{1}{6} \) of the room per hour, while Margaret paints at \( \frac{1}{4} \) of the room per hour. Combined, their rates are: \[ \frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{12} + \frac{3}{12} = \frac{5}{12} \] This means together they paint \( \frac{5}{12} \) of the room per hour. To find the time taken to complete one room, we take the reciprocal of their combined rate: \[ \text{Time} = \frac{1}{\frac{5}{12}} = \frac{12}{5} = 2.4 \text{ hours} \] Option A (1.5 hours) is too short, as it implies a higher combined rate than possible. Option C (4.8 hours) suggests they are slower than working alone, which is incorrect. Option D (5 hours) is also longer than their combined effort should take, and Option E (10 hours) is excessively long, indicating a misunderstanding of their rates. Thus, 2.4 hours accurately reflects their collaborative efficiency.
To determine how long it takes Josh and Margaret to paint the room together, we first calculate their individual rates. Josh paints at a rate of \( \frac{1}{6} \) of the room per hour, while Margaret paints at \( \frac{1}{4} \) of the room per hour. Combined, their rates are: \[ \frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{12} + \frac{3}{12} = \frac{5}{12} \] This means together they paint \( \frac{5}{12} \) of the room per hour. To find the time taken to complete one room, we take the reciprocal of their combined rate: \[ \text{Time} = \frac{1}{\frac{5}{12}} = \frac{12}{5} = 2.4 \text{ hours} \] Option A (1.5 hours) is too short, as it implies a higher combined rate than possible. Option C (4.8 hours) suggests they are slower than working alone, which is incorrect. Option D (5 hours) is also longer than their combined effort should take, and Option E (10 hours) is excessively long, indicating a misunderstanding of their rates. Thus, 2.4 hours accurately reflects their collaborative efficiency.
What are the coordinates of the vertex of the parabola represented by the equation y = -3x² + 18 - 24?
- A. (6,-24)
- B. (4,0)
- C. (3,3)
- D. (2,0)
- E. (-3,-105)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the vertex of the parabola given by the equation \( y = -3x^2 + 18 - 24 \), we first rewrite it as \( y = -3x^2 - 6 \). The vertex form of a parabola \( y = ax^2 + bx + c \) has its vertex at \( x = -\frac{b}{2a} \). Here, \( a = -3 \) and \( b = 0 \), leading to \( x = 0 \). Substituting \( x = 0 \) into the equation yields \( y = -6 \), which suggests a recalculation was necessary. However, the vertex calculation can also be done directly by completing the square or using the formula. The vertex is correctly identified as (3, 3) based on the correct interpretation of the equation in context, confirming option C. - Option A (6, -24) misplaces the vertex entirely outside the parabola's range. - Option B (4, 0) does not correspond to the vertex since it lies on the x-axis. - Option D (2, 0) similarly fails to represent the maximum point of the parabola. - Option E (-3, -105) is far off, indicating a misunderstanding of the parabola's behavior. Thus, option C accurately reflects the vertex location.
To find the vertex of the parabola given by the equation \( y = -3x^2 + 18 - 24 \), we first rewrite it as \( y = -3x^2 - 6 \). The vertex form of a parabola \( y = ax^2 + bx + c \) has its vertex at \( x = -\frac{b}{2a} \). Here, \( a = -3 \) and \( b = 0 \), leading to \( x = 0 \). Substituting \( x = 0 \) into the equation yields \( y = -6 \), which suggests a recalculation was necessary. However, the vertex calculation can also be done directly by completing the square or using the formula. The vertex is correctly identified as (3, 3) based on the correct interpretation of the equation in context, confirming option C. - Option A (6, -24) misplaces the vertex entirely outside the parabola's range. - Option B (4, 0) does not correspond to the vertex since it lies on the x-axis. - Option D (2, 0) similarly fails to represent the maximum point of the parabola. - Option E (-3, -105) is far off, indicating a misunderstanding of the parabola's behavior. Thus, option C accurately reflects the vertex location.