According to scientists, the seven separate continents of the world in the far distant past, one vast land mass
- A. the world, in the far distant past
- B. the world, being in the far distant past
- C. the world were, in the far distant past
- D. the world was, in the far distant past
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
In this sentence, clarity and grammatical accuracy are essential. Option D accurately uses "was" to indicate that the continents once existed as a single land mass in the past, aligning with standard subject-verb agreement. Option A is incomplete, lacking a verb that connects the subject to the predicate. Option B incorrectly uses "being," which does not convey the past tense needed for this context. Option C uses "were," which is incorrect as it implies a plural subject, while "the world" is singular. Thus, D is the only option that correctly reflects the historical context and grammatical structure.
In this sentence, clarity and grammatical accuracy are essential. Option D accurately uses "was" to indicate that the continents once existed as a single land mass in the past, aligning with standard subject-verb agreement. Option A is incomplete, lacking a verb that connects the subject to the predicate. Option B incorrectly uses "being," which does not convey the past tense needed for this context. Option C uses "were," which is incorrect as it implies a plural subject, while "the world" is singular. Thus, D is the only option that correctly reflects the historical context and grammatical structure.
Other Related Questions
In context, which of the following would best be inserted after sentence 6 (reproduced below) as an appropriate example? Such problems are expensive for a government to solve, and often a 'solution' that helps one group hurts another.
- A. The creation of new watering holes for elephants provides temporary jobs for local residents.
- B. Declaring certain areas off limits to agricultural development can dangerously limit people's food supply.
- C. Wild animals that prey on domestic livestock are active mostly at night.
- D. Legislation attempting to transfer responsibility for wildlife to a country's citizens has failed in other parts of Africa.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Option B effectively illustrates how a government solution, such as restricting agricultural development, can inadvertently harm local communities by jeopardizing their food supply. This aligns with the notion that a solution benefiting one group can negatively impact another. Option A, while relevant, focuses on temporary job creation without addressing the broader implications of resource allocation. Option C provides factual information about wildlife behavior but lacks a direct connection to the theme of conflicting interests among groups. Option D discusses legislative failures but does not exemplify the immediate consequences of a specific government action, missing the focus on direct harm to a group.
Option B effectively illustrates how a government solution, such as restricting agricultural development, can inadvertently harm local communities by jeopardizing their food supply. This aligns with the notion that a solution benefiting one group can negatively impact another. Option A, while relevant, focuses on temporary job creation without addressing the broader implications of resource allocation. Option C provides factual information about wildlife behavior but lacks a direct connection to the theme of conflicting interests among groups. Option D discusses legislative failures but does not exemplify the immediate consequences of a specific government action, missing the focus on direct harm to a group.
Which of the following is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 6 (reproduced below)? Some researchers have cited this evidence as it made an argument that MSA hunters were less skilled than LSA hunters.
- A. (as it is now)
- B. evidence and were making
- C. evidence, having made
- D. evidence to make
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Option D clarifies the relationship between the evidence and the argument, indicating that the evidence was used to support the claim about MSA hunters. This creates a clear and logical connection. Option A retains the original phrasing, which is vague and awkward, failing to effectively convey the intended meaning. Option B uses "and were making," which introduces unnecessary complexity and shifts the focus away from the evidence itself. Option C's "having made" implies a completed action that does not align with the ongoing nature of the argument being presented.
Option D clarifies the relationship between the evidence and the argument, indicating that the evidence was used to support the claim about MSA hunters. This creates a clear and logical connection. Option A retains the original phrasing, which is vague and awkward, failing to effectively convey the intended meaning. Option B uses "and were making," which introduces unnecessary complexity and shifts the focus away from the evidence itself. Option C's "having made" implies a completed action that does not align with the ongoing nature of the argument being presented.
In context, which of the following is best to do with sentence 11 (reproduced below)? They say that successful continuation of conservancies will benefit future generations, attracting more and more tourists from around the globe.
- A. Replace 'will' with 'is likely to'
- B. Replace 'attracting' with 'to attract'
- C. Replace 'They say' with 'Supporters claim'
- D. Delete 'more and more'
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Replacing "They say" with "Supporters claim" enhances clarity by specifying the source of the assertion, making the statement more authoritative. This change helps readers understand that the viewpoint is held by a specific group, which adds credibility to the claim. Option A, "is likely to," weakens the certainty of the statement, diminishing its impact. Option B, changing "attracting" to "to attract," disrupts the sentence's flow and alters its grammatical structure unnecessarily. Option D, deleting "more and more," removes emphasis on the increasing nature of tourism, which is central to the message about future benefits.
Replacing "They say" with "Supporters claim" enhances clarity by specifying the source of the assertion, making the statement more authoritative. This change helps readers understand that the viewpoint is held by a specific group, which adds credibility to the claim. Option A, "is likely to," weakens the certainty of the statement, diminishing its impact. Option B, changing "attracting" to "to attract," disrupts the sentence's flow and alters its grammatical structure unnecessarily. Option D, deleting "more and more," removes emphasis on the increasing nature of tourism, which is central to the message about future benefits.
Which of the following sentences contains information irrelevant to the passage as a whole and should be deleted?
- A. Sentence 4
- B. Sentence 5
- C. Sentence 7
- D. Sentence 9
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Sentence 7 introduces an anecdote that, while interesting, does not contribute to the main argument of the passage. Its narrative focus distracts from the central theme, making it less relevant. Sentence 4 provides essential context that supports the overall message, while Sentence 5 summarizes key points, reinforcing the passage’s purpose. Sentence 9 offers a concluding thought that ties back to the main argument, enhancing the reader's understanding. Thus, only Sentence 7 diverges from the primary focus, warranting its removal for clarity and coherence.
Sentence 7 introduces an anecdote that, while interesting, does not contribute to the main argument of the passage. Its narrative focus distracts from the central theme, making it less relevant. Sentence 4 provides essential context that supports the overall message, while Sentence 5 summarizes key points, reinforcing the passage’s purpose. Sentence 9 offers a concluding thought that ties back to the main argument, enhancing the reader's understanding. Thus, only Sentence 7 diverges from the primary focus, warranting its removal for clarity and coherence.