Frederick Winslow Taylor
The following is an obituary from March 21, 1915, announcing the death of Frederick Winslow Taylor.
1 PHILADELPHIA, March 21: Frederick Winslow Tayler, originator of the modem scientific management movement, died here today from pneumonia. He was 59 years old, and was a former President of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Among his numerous inventions and discoveries was the Taylor-White process of treating modem high-speed took. He was the author of articles on scientific efficiency. and installed his system in many large industrial establishments.
2 The writings and lectures of Frederic Winslow Taylor formed the basis of the recent reorganization of methods of handing labor in many of the largest industries in the country. The articles of Mr. Taylor on "Scientific Management" in 1911 had a good deal to do with giving its new, special meaning to the word "efficiency" and making it the watchword which it has become since that time.
3 One of his leading doctrines which has made a deep impression on business and industry in this country since that time is that a man who proves incompetent at one jab should be fitted in where he can give good service, instead of being discharged. His life work was chiefly devoted to the simplification of industrial processes to reduce costs and increase Outputs.
4 Mr. Taylor was born at Germantown, Philadelphia, on March 20, 1856, and was graduated from Stevens Institute of Technology in 1883. He won the doubles championship of the United States at tennis at Newport in 1881. He entered the employ of the Midvale Steel Company at Philadelphia in 1878 and was successively gang boss, assistant foreman, foreman of the machine shop, master mechanic, chief draughtsman, and chief engineer.
5 In 1889 he began his special work of re-organizing the management of
What did Taylor believe should be done if an employee was not good at doing an assigned job?
- A. The employee should be fired.
- B. That job's duties should be reorganized.
- C. A job better suited to the employee should be found.
- D. The employee should be made to read Taylor's books and articles.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Taylor advocated for scientific management, emphasizing the importance of matching employees to jobs that fit their skills and abilities. Finding a job better suited to an employee (Option C) aligns with his belief in optimizing workforce efficiency and productivity. Option A, firing the employee, disregards the potential for growth and development. Option B, reorganizing job duties, may not address the root issue of skill mismatches. Option D, making the employee read Taylor's works, lacks practical application and does not directly resolve the employee's performance issues. Thus, aligning roles with individual strengths is key to achieving success.
Taylor advocated for scientific management, emphasizing the importance of matching employees to jobs that fit their skills and abilities. Finding a job better suited to an employee (Option C) aligns with his belief in optimizing workforce efficiency and productivity. Option A, firing the employee, disregards the potential for growth and development. Option B, reorganizing job duties, may not address the root issue of skill mismatches. Option D, making the employee read Taylor's works, lacks practical application and does not directly resolve the employee's performance issues. Thus, aligning roles with individual strengths is key to achieving success.
Other Related Questions
Assume that the state of Kansas passed a law limiting the number of hours teenagers could work on farms, and the state's farmers challenged the law. The decision in which of these cases could be cited in support of Kansas's law?
- A. Commonwealth v. Hunt
- B. Muller v. Oregon
- C. Brown v. Board of Education
- D. Engel v. Vitale
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Muller v. Oregon upheld the state's ability to regulate working hours for women, emphasizing the government's role in protecting public welfare. This precedent supports Kansas's law limiting teenage work hours on farms, as it aligns with the principle of safeguarding minors' health and well-being. Commonwealth v. Hunt dealt with labor unions and the right to organize, which does not pertain to youth labor regulations. Brown v. Board of Education focused on desegregation in schools, irrelevant to labor laws. Engel v. Vitale addressed school prayer, having no connection to employment issues. Thus, only Muller v. Oregon directly supports the rationale for Kansas's law.
Muller v. Oregon upheld the state's ability to regulate working hours for women, emphasizing the government's role in protecting public welfare. This precedent supports Kansas's law limiting teenage work hours on farms, as it aligns with the principle of safeguarding minors' health and well-being. Commonwealth v. Hunt dealt with labor unions and the right to organize, which does not pertain to youth labor regulations. Brown v. Board of Education focused on desegregation in schools, irrelevant to labor laws. Engel v. Vitale addressed school prayer, having no connection to employment issues. Thus, only Muller v. Oregon directly supports the rationale for Kansas's law.
The purpose of antitrust legislation is to
- A. remove obstacles creating a trade imbalance.
- B. ensure fair competition in an open-market economy.
- C. prevent a nation's currency from losing too much value.
- D. improve consumer access to corporate financial information
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Antitrust legislation is designed to promote fair competition within an open-market economy, preventing monopolistic practices that can harm consumers and stifle innovation. Option A focuses on trade imbalances, which relate more to trade policies than to antitrust laws. Option C addresses currency valuation, a topic more relevant to monetary policy than competition laws. Option D concerns financial transparency, which, while important, is not the primary aim of antitrust regulations. Thus, ensuring fair competition is the central goal of antitrust legislation, safeguarding consumer interests and promoting a healthy market environment.
Antitrust legislation is designed to promote fair competition within an open-market economy, preventing monopolistic practices that can harm consumers and stifle innovation. Option A focuses on trade imbalances, which relate more to trade policies than to antitrust laws. Option C addresses currency valuation, a topic more relevant to monetary policy than competition laws. Option D concerns financial transparency, which, while important, is not the primary aim of antitrust regulations. Thus, ensuring fair competition is the central goal of antitrust legislation, safeguarding consumer interests and promoting a healthy market environment.
The U.S. Supreme Court considered a case in which a political activist was jailed for stating publicly that World War I was a rich man's war but a poor man's fight. To which case is this case most similar?
- A. Commonwealth v. Hunt
- B. Muller v. Oregon
- C. Schenck v. United States
- D. Brown v. Board of Education
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The case involving the political activist parallels **Schenck v. United States** due to its focus on free speech during wartime. In Schenck, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of an individual for distributing anti-draft leaflets, emphasizing that speech could be limited if it posed a "clear and present danger." **Commonwealth v. Hunt** pertains to labor unions and the legality of their activities, making it unrelated to free speech issues. **Muller v. Oregon** deals with labor laws and women's rights, not political expression. **Brown v. Board of Education** addresses racial segregation in schools, which diverges from the context of wartime speech and activism.
The case involving the political activist parallels **Schenck v. United States** due to its focus on free speech during wartime. In Schenck, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of an individual for distributing anti-draft leaflets, emphasizing that speech could be limited if it posed a "clear and present danger." **Commonwealth v. Hunt** pertains to labor unions and the legality of their activities, making it unrelated to free speech issues. **Muller v. Oregon** deals with labor laws and women's rights, not political expression. **Brown v. Board of Education** addresses racial segregation in schools, which diverges from the context of wartime speech and activism.
New evidence is discovered for a case in which the person charged with the crime has already been found 'not guilty.' Which amendment prohibits the state from trying that person again on the same charges?
- A. Amendment 4
- B. Amendment 5
- C. Amendment 6
- D. Amendment 10
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
The Fifth Amendment includes the protection against double jeopardy, which prohibits an individual from being tried again for the same crime after a verdict of not guilty. This principle ensures that once a person has been acquitted, they cannot face the same charges again, regardless of new evidence. Option A, the Fourth Amendment, deals with protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, which is unrelated to criminal trials. Option C, the Sixth Amendment, guarantees rights related to criminal prosecutions, such as the right to a speedy trial and an impartial jury, but does not address double jeopardy. Option D, the Tenth Amendment, reserves powers to the states and the people, but does not pertain to criminal prosecution rights.
The Fifth Amendment includes the protection against double jeopardy, which prohibits an individual from being tried again for the same crime after a verdict of not guilty. This principle ensures that once a person has been acquitted, they cannot face the same charges again, regardless of new evidence. Option A, the Fourth Amendment, deals with protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, which is unrelated to criminal trials. Option C, the Sixth Amendment, guarantees rights related to criminal prosecutions, such as the right to a speedy trial and an impartial jury, but does not address double jeopardy. Option D, the Tenth Amendment, reserves powers to the states and the people, but does not pertain to criminal prosecution rights.